Forums

  1. About organissimo...

    1. Announcements

      News about the board or organissimo

      801
      posts
    2. organissimo - The Band Discussion

      Discuss the group, organissimo! The group's music, CDs, gigs, the three members, etc.

      5,216
      posts
    3. Forums Discussion

      Suggestions, feedback, comments concerning the organissimo forums.

      26,965
      posts
  2. Music Discussion

    1. Album Of The Week

      A fine, original Organissimo tradition!

      6,506
      posts
    2. Artists

      Discuss your favorite artists.

      144,004
      posts
    3. Audio Talk

      Components, interconnects, recordings, etc...

      18,912
      posts
    4. Blindfold Test

      Another fine Organissimo tradition!

      21,959
      posts
    5. Classical Discussion

      Self-explanatory...

      22,861
      posts
    6. Discography

      Artist discography questions and answers.

      32,387
      posts
    7. 34,569
      posts
    8. Jazz Radio & Podcasts

      Standard or internet, discuss your favorite stations and podcasts!

      12,993
      posts
    9. Live Shows & Festivals

      Hip fellow board members to upcoming concerts...

      28,609
      posts
    10. Mosaic and other box sets...

      All things dealing with box sets.

      65,047
      posts
    11. Miscellaneous Music

      Miscellaneous music discussion area.

      221,798
      posts
    12. Musician's Forum

      A forum for other musicians to share information.

      13,023
      posts
    13. New Releases

      Discuss new releases from various labels.

      36,169
      posts
    14. Offering and Looking For...

      Trade, sell, swap, recordings with fellow members.

      36,833
      posts
    15. Recommendations

      Suggest recordings to your fellow board (bored?) members...

      63,403
      posts
    16. Re-issues

      Discuss the current crop of re-issues hitting the market.

      62,363
      posts
    17. The Vinyl Frontier

      All things related to the long-lived analog marvel!

      62,645
      posts
  3. General Discussion

    1. Hammond Zone

      General discussion about all things Hammond organ!

      4,835
      posts
    2. Miscellaneous - Non-Political

      NO religious or political discussion will be tolerated.

      324,362
      posts
  • Donation Goals

    2020 Fundraiser Copy

    The server cost to keep this forum running is $225 per month. Please consider contributing to the fundraiser. Paypal only at this time.

    If you'd like to send a check, please address to:
    organissimo
    1610 Davis Ave
    Lansing MI 48910



    $1,295.00 of $2,800.00 goal reached.
    Donate Now
  • Latest Donations

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miles Davis & Bill Evans
      Kins of Blue aside, Jimmy Giuffre + Paul Bley = more, more better, more lasting, more inytiguing, less cliche-able music than Miles Davis + Bill Evans.  
    • Miles Davis & Bill Evans
      To quote myself: "Quite articulate about his music, i.n a 1964 interview Evans said this: 'The only way I can work is to have some kind of restraint involved, the challenge of a certain kind craft or form and then to find the freedom in that.... I think that a lot of guys ... want to circumvent that kind of labor.' Then there is this Evans statement: 'I believe that all music is romantic, but if it gets schmaltzy, romanticism is disturbing. On the other hand, romanticism handled with discipline is the most beautiful kind of beauty.' "Plusible words perhaps, but the value that Evans seemingly places on restraint in itself leads one to ask what is being restrained and why? Evans' "challenge of [working within] a certain kind craft or form" Is not merely an account of his own necessary practice; it lends to that practice an air of moral virtue ("I think that a lot of guys ... want to circumvent that kind of labor.') In other words, for Evans certain kinds of musical labor are not only valid but they also validate. And should an aesthetically valid outcome be reached in a seemingly non-laborious manner, that can be disturbing. Thus in 1964, after acknowledging the brilliance.ant, ludic, and completely unpremeditated two-piano improvisation that he and Paul Bley contributed to George Riussell's 1960 album "Jazz in the Space Age.," was "filled to do," Evans says, "[But to do] something that hadn't been rehearsed successfully, just like that, almost shows the lack of challenge involved in that kind of freedom."

      Geez, Louise -- you think it might show something else? Like maybe that certain "just like that" circumstances might lead to results and discoveries that the world of "challenges" and "restraints" (as Evans conceives the meaning of those terms) might not lead to? And why does the absence of successful rehearsals (I assume Evans meant that the Evans-Bley duo piano  improvisation was not rehearsed at all rather than unsuccssfully rehearsed) equal a "lack of challenge"? Doesn't it merely modify the nature of the challenge, if you want to use that term? BTW, in that duo portion of "Jazz in the Space Age," does anyone have the sense that Evans and Bley are "merely "tossing off" what they play rather than paying very close attention to what they're doing/what's happening?   Also,  "romanticism handled with discipline is the most beautiful kind of beauty." What the heck does Evans think romanticism is? It was an epoch of sensibility that fueled much creativity in all the arts for a good portion of the 19th Century and has had an even longer life, especially in music, in terms of audience appeal. That I think would be accurate. But I would guess that that is not quite what Evans means but rather something ike "music that can more or less melt you"  -- say, Chopin or Rachmaninov, which is BTW not to denigrate the music of those composers in any way; Chopin is a giant, and Rachmaninov's popularity should not obscure the substance of his best work. In any case, while much Bach does melt many people,  by no means does Bach's music fall under the umbrella of romanticism in the first and more accurate sense of the term I outlined above.
    • What Classical Music Are You Listening To?
      Sinfonie singuliere (No.3)   and   Sinfonie capricieuse (No.2)