Jump to content

Where's Clementine?


paul secor

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He had a flurry of post deleting back in early June.  Don't know what that means.  I hope he and his family are doing well.

Yes I noticed that he must have deleted some posts when I read an old thread the other day & it reads like I was having an arguement with myself. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function. With my self-imposed exile from the Politics Forum, he's the sole reason I'd ever consider using that option. I'll probably draw him out of hiding by saying this, but perhaps I won't have to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

Edited by Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

Does anyone remember when Dan went ballistic last August when I posted a picture of a woman in a two piece swimsuit in the babe's thread? He called it pornographic!

:rofl:

Good times, good times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

Does anyone remember when Dan went ballistic last August when I posted a picture of a woman in a two piece swimsuit in the babe's thread? He called it pornographic!

:rofl:

Good times, good times...

Don't want this to be an "insult Dan" thread any more than I want it to be an "insult Clem" thread...

Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

Does anyone remember when Dan went ballistic last August when I posted a picture of a woman in a two piece swimsuit in the babe's thread? He called it pornographic!

:rofl:

Good times, good times...

Don't want this to be an "insult Dan" thread any more than I want it to be an "insult Clem" thread...

Guy

I'm not insulting anybody. They're free to behave any way they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

Actually I believe it was Allen Lowe who welcomed the possibility of an ignore function for ol' Clem. As I say, I haven't used it yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"?  I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

            Guy

It ain't the first time. Probably won't be the last. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.

Shouldn't this be changed to "they had people with sensitivities like Dan Gould's in mind"? I've butted heads with Clem on this board, but these kinds of behind-the-back insults are lame.

Guy

And how exactly is it a behind-the-back insult???

Last time I checked, this was a public forum. If Clem is lurking or ever comes back, it will be right there for him to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they had people like Clem in mind when they designed the "Ignore" function.  With my self-imposed exile from the Politics Forum, he's the sole reason I'd ever consider using that option.  I'll probably draw him out of hiding by saying this, but perhaps I won't have to?

Some might call it an insult and it very well may be.

It's more baiting - that's what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...