Jump to content

Dark Classical Reccomendations


md655321

Recommended Posts

I know this have been done a few times, and I read some of the previous threads, but I'll still ask.

I've never really gotten into any classical music, mainly because of the pompousness of much of it (or atleast of the listeners.) For the most part, happy or major classical just isnt doing it for me. So I was wondering if you guys had any reccomendations for dark sounding works by major (but in minor key, if you will) composers. My jazz tastes tend towards the out (not totally free, but stuff like late period trane, sam rivers, ornette etc...) if that helps.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a few recommendations of "not happy" composers, all from the past century actually (one of the less happy, generally speaking).

These have been covered by the Kronos Quartet:

Black Angels by George Crumb

String Quartets 1 and 2 by Henryk Gorecki

Ghost Opera by Tan Dun

This CD is harder to find but definitely on two dark subjects:

Krzysztof Penderecki: Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima / Viola Concerto / Nancy van de Vate: Chernobyl / Concerto No. 1 for Violin & Orchestra

Finally, I really like Quartet for the End of Time by Messaien. I have three versions of it. I find this a bit unusual because 1) I'm not quite as entranced by his other material and 2) I generally don't like music with overt religious significance, such as masses. (Even Ellington's Sacred Music leaves me a bit cold.)But this is fascinating stuff with an ending that is intentionally "celestial." So Messaien may fail on the grounds he is too religious to be truly unhappy, but it's definitely worth one listen.

Here's a review that I'm stealing from Amazon with some of the back story:

Messaien wrote "Quartet for the End of Time" in a Nazi prison camp. This work was first performed by half-starved prisoners on broken instruments, to an audience of arrogant Nazi prison camp guards and officials, and the people they had enslaved in the name of the Third Reich.

The work that Messaien composed in the face of this titanic evil was not a work of anger or bitterness. It was not a work of resignation to an inevitable fate or a hymn to depression. Messaien chose to represent, musically, the end of all things, as described in the Book of Revelations in the Bible ... which he interpreted not in the fashion of modern day "born again" fundamentalists, but in a mystical way, as a spiritual event that had resonance in his time.

Musically, Messaien was forced to write the Quartet for the instruments he had available to him. He also had to take into account that the instruments were half-broken; for example, the piano that was used in the original performance was missing strings and therefore there were notes that it could not play. Messaien wrote with all this in mind, and with his subject matter in mind.

The Quartet is definitely a 20th Century work. Messaien had been writing works outside of the accepted "classical" form for some time, but here he abandons time signatures, uses extreme chromaticism and wide tonal variations, sweeps of dynamic range, and unexpected, perhaps unprecedented, tonalities and atonalities.

But he did all this with focus. So many 20th Century composers made music that seemed an academic exercise. Messaien, here, uses every musical expression in his power, every type of music that he knows how to write, every sound that he hears in his head, to write the Quartet for the End of Time, in the service of God and Man and Freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of the 20th Century fits this bill

Works by Bartok (String quartets might be up your alley) and Stravinsky (Rite of Spring, other major ballets) are the most obvious recommendations.  You might also like Beethoven and Haydn's minor key works.

        Guy

Bartok was the first composer that came to mind for me. The string quartets are astringent, bracing, and essential, in my opinion.

Oh, yeah, and dark too. Think of that Balkan temperament.

Hmmm.

stravinsky4.jpg

Not really dark or brooding, but I think you might really enjoy Satie's piano pieces.  I find them fascinating.

:g:g:g:g

"Not really dark or brooding" in the friggin' extreme.

I love Satie, but he's picnic music compared to Bartok, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, etc.

Damn, Try Bach, Beethoven, etc. Stick to the more austere forms -- solo instruments, string quartets -- and they should at least approximate your cup of tea. Just skip the romantics and you'll be pretty much assured of astringent angst, rectilinear rigor, and depressing dolor.

:tup:tup:tup:tup:ph34r::(:(:(:(:rhappy::rhappy::rhappy::rhappy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalo gave a good description. The reason I brought up Feldman wasn't exactly that I find him dark (though he's hardly bright and bubbly), but because I've spun Music for Rothko Chapel for a couple of different avant-jazz freaks at my place and they both bought it afterwards.

Regardless of what you think of Gorecki, he can certainly be dark and brooding!

Come to think of it, Bach's Mass in B Minor is pretty dark in spots. I have the Klemperer version. I rarely listen to it, but every time I do I'm blown away. But then, I know even less about classical than I do about jazz, so I'm probably not one to be handing out advice...

Edited by J Larsen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalo gave a good description. The reason I brought up Feldman wasn't exactly that I find him dark (though he's hardly bright and bubbly), but because I've spun Music for Rothko Chapel for a couple of different avant-jazz freaks at my place and they both bought it afterwards.

Regardless of what you think of Gorecki, he can certainly be dark and brooding!

Come to think of it, Bach's Mass in B Minor is pretty dark in spots. I have the Klemperer version. I rarely listen to it, but every time I do I'm blown away. But then, I know even less about classical than I do about jazz, so I'm probably not one to be handing out advice...

Anyone who really wants to expand their musical horizons should listen to late Feldman.

His stuff is meditative, but hardly "New Age."

It's thorny, but in slow.... SLOW.... motion.

I class him with the other composers who I consider to have written "etudes for listeners," akin to Charles Ives and Conlon Nancarrow (I'd include John Cage, as well, but he's more interesting to think about than to listen to).

As an aside, I don't think that I understood Ives as well as I do until I heard Conlon Nancarrow's pieces, which taught me how to really hear Ives properly, in all his glory...

I guess what I'm trying to say is, just jump right on in: you'll sort it out eventually. I look forward to reading YOUR take on all of this. The history of this music is still being written and you just may have some input.

Edited by Kalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...