24 Years Later, Believe It or Not, the Who’s Next

[7/4]

October 29, 2006

Music

24 Years Later, Believe It or Not, the Who’s Next

By ALAN LIGHT

SIX years ago, at a press conference to kick off a tour by the Who, the singer Roger Daltrey announced that he was working on songs for the band’s new album. The bass player John Entwistle chimed in that he was doing the same. This news shocked Pete Townshend, the band’s guitarist and primary songwriter, though it was mostly a bluff meant to prod him into action.

After much further cajoling from Mr. Daltrey, Mr. Townshend finally sat down to try writing the music last year. But he had no idea what he wanted the new record to sound like — especially since the results would be the illustrious band’s first album since 1982.

“You come up against such enormous preconceptions about what would constitute material for a new Who album,” he said. “It had to deal with the past and the future and contain that magic ingredient, and I tried to figure out what that was.”

The result is “Endless Wire,” coming out Tuesday on Universal Republic Records. A sprawling work, it ranges from the first songs Mr. Townshend and Mr. Daltrey have ever recorded as an acoustic duo to some that hold their own next to the band’s finest stadium rockers. At its heart is “Wire & Glass,” a 10-song “mini-opera” that is Mr. Townshend’s latest foray into extended musical narrative, an approach he pioneered with the rock operas “Tommy” and “Quadrophenia.”

“The stripped-down acoustic-vocal stuff is what slays me,” Eddie Vedder, Pearl Jam’s lead singer and a longtime champion of the older band, wrote in an e-mail message. “After 20-plus years of not recording new Who material, they didn’t pick up where they left off — it’s where they are now.”

The album announces that one of the greatest rock bands of all time is back in business as something more than a touring heritage act. The release also puts the spotlight back on the notoriously spiky partnership that helped bring it into being.

Mr. Daltrey, 62, and Mr. Townshend, 61, are the two surviving members of the founding lineup, after the deaths of their incendiary drummer, Keith Moon, in 1978 and Mr. Entwistle in 2002. And though they seem lately to have attained an uneasy peace in their relationship, it was clear in separate interviews — Mr. Daltrey in a friend’s apartment high above Central Park and Mr. Townshend over the phone from a tour stop in Vancouver — that this hasn’t stopped them from taking the occasional swipe at each other.

“After John died,” Mr. Townshend said, referring to Mr. Entwistle, “I was left with one very clear relationship and that was with Roger — which was probably the least important to me in the band. We had a lot of discussion that our friendship meant more to us than anything else.”

Mr. Daltrey puts it another way: “He’s like the brother I never had. I love him dearly; I don’t like him sometimes, but I love him dearly. And I’m sure he would say the same about me.”

Mr. Daltrey recalled the day, just before Christmas, when some demo recordings arrived. “He told the press that he’d given me 26 songs,” said Mr. Daltrey, “yet I only received 4! So I was still very skeptical as to whether this was really going to happen, because I’ve been burned so many times before.”

After handing over that first batch, Mr. Townshend set the new songs aside to concentrate on a different kind of writing, which led to the mini-opera. “I’d written a novella as a possible basis for a theatrical play or a two-man show or maybe something in Las Vegas,” he said. “I didn’t know what it was.”

“The Boy Who Heard Music” (posted at www.petetownshend.co.uk/projects/tbwhm) is a tightly knit, hallucinatory tale of the rise and fall of a band made up of three teenagers from different ethnic groups, and an aging rock star observing them from a mental institution. (Mr. Townshend says his online research for the project led to his arrest in 2003 on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children; the charge was dropped, but he remains on a sex-offender watch list.) He reworked the novella into “Wire & Glass” — some songs that “had some teeth," he said. He then “knocked off the rest a bit Jack White style, using stuff from notebooks as far back as 1971,” and after more than two decades, a new Who album was ready to roll.

Still, Mr. Townshend was apprehensive about sending these songs to Mr. Daltrey. “Roger is always difficult to present new music to,” he said. “He operates rather like an editor. When you present him with finished material, he’s a fantastically positive interpreter. But I don’t think he knows enough about being an artist and the vulnerability of the creative process.”

Mr. Daltrey — who called “Wire & Glass” a “quirky, cranky idea” — suggested that Mr. Townshend’s narrative writing had as much to do with marketing as with art. “In the early days we used to call it hype, and it still is hype,” he said. “It was a device to get noticed in the press: ‘Oh, the Who have a new album, just like the Stones and the Beatles.’ But if you said you had a mini-opera, then all of a sudden they were interested.

“Whatever Pete wants to call it as the device that makes him write the songs, I don’t care,” he continued. “There’s still some interesting words on there. So I take all of that with a pinch of salt, and I don’t fight it anymore.”

Forty-two years after their first recording and 24 years after a Who “farewell tour” — a farewell that lasted seven years before the band went back on the road — the volatile chemistry between the singer and the guitarist still yields a powerful stage presence, as a series of recent shows in the New York area proved. (The touring band also includes Mr. Townshend’s brother Simon on guitar, Pino Palladino on bass, Zak Starkey on drums and John Rabbit Bundrick on keyboards. On the album, Pete Townshend plays numerous instruments and Peter Huntington plays drums on many tracks, since Mr. Starkey — Ringo Starr’s son — was touring with the band Oasis when most of the album was recorded.)

The band was the clear highlight of the Concert for New York City after the 9/11 attacks, an intensely emotional show that Mr. Townshend described as an example of “the Who mechanism working in ideal circumstances.” As this tour was starting, however, the band mates’ differing worldviews — which Mr. Townshend attributed to the contrast between his more bohemian art-school background and Mr. Daltrey’s more working-class roots — clashed yet again.

Mr. Townshend, always interested in new technology, announced that the concerts would be Webcast, only to retract those plans a few days later at Mr. Daltrey’s insistence. Eventually, the band made a deal with Sirius Satellite Radio to broadcast the shows as part of an all-Who channel that will continue throughout the tour.

“I don’t particularly like the world technology has created,” Mr. Daltrey said. “Has anything really gotten better with the computer, or are you just doing more and more of less and less? I’m incredibly paranoid about it, especially after what happened to Pete. I think the Internet is just an advertising device of very dubious returns.

“Also, I haven’t got the luxury of throwing the kind of money at it that he can,” he continued, referring to Mr. Townshend’s songwriting revenue. “I haven’t got the publishing, I’m just the singer. So I have to look at it much more hard-nosed as a business and ask if I can put a million dollars into it, and the answer is no.”

Mr. Townshend responded: “Roger likes things that are finished, and with the Internet, everything is a work in progress. I try not to bludgeon him with this stuff, but I can’t help it; it’s my passion.”

For Mr. Daltrey, “Endless Wire” closes a door for the band that was left open after the death of the high-flying Mr. Moon (about whom he is developing a film project, with Mike Myers committed to the role). “We were ill equipped to deal with Keith’s problems at the time,” he said. “If we’d known then what we know now about rehabilitation, we wouldn’t have lost him. So it always felt that if that had really been the end, it wouldn’t have been right. With this album, now there can be an ending. I don’t want it to be, but it can be, and I’m at peace with that.”

Mr. Townshend, characteristically, disagreed with that assessment. “It doesn’t feel like closure; it feels completely new,” he said. “Closure implies that we couldn’t do it again, couldn’t do another album with the same quality and dignity.

“This album isn’t some sort of Who miracle. It’s just two guys who’ve come together to do something creative. It just happens to be under a very powerful brand name.”

[Joe G]

Mike Myers???

[7/4]

Hopefully it's his first serious role.

[Big Al]

The first song off the album (which can be heard on aol music) sounds like "Baba O'Riley" sped up, and Daltrey's voice is huffy at best. I didn't go any further.

[Jazzmoose]

It's only geezer wasteland...

[chewy-chew-chew-bean-benitez]

it is good ive already seen it in concert

[Big Al]

It's only geezer wasteland...

[Ken Dryden]

I saw the band in 1974 and again during the reunion tour (1988 or 1989) and I wasn't really impressed

with the Moon-less version. I can't imagine that they're up to snuff today.

[Adam]

I saw them last night at the Hollywood Bowl, and they were, well, okay. Everything was played fine, but nothing went beyond. There was some tentativeness, accountable to at least 2 things:

1. This was teh first concert of teh second leg of their North American tour - they hadn't played in a few weeks.

2. The keyboard player was a last-minute sub for Rabbit. Townsend event announced that they had had no rehearsals with the new guy.

A woman standing nearby said she has come to see them each of the last few times at the Hollywood Bowl (that is their venue of choice in LA - 4 times in a row) and declared it the worst of the shows.

It was serviceable. The new songs weren't that inspired, although a couple of the slower ones were better.

I saw them last (and only) in 1989 - their first comeback tour - at the Coliseum. Never saw them with Moon. But hey, they had Keith Moon in the band for 10 years, and have been without him for 30 years, so...

[Tom 1960]

Interesting enough, Rolling Stone magaziine gives the new album 4 Stars. I had the opportunity to sample the tracks at Barnes and Noble and it doesn't sound half bad. I might take the plunge.

[Big Al]

After seeing so many glowing reviews of the album, I went back to AOL music and tried to listen again. I couldn't get past the third song, where Townshend does this embarrassing growl. The second song was good, an acoustic rail against religious hypocrisy. But that third song.... ugh!

[Quincy]

After seeing so many glowing reviews of the album, I went back to AOL music and tried to listen again. I couldn't get past the third song, where Townshend does this embarrassing growl. The second song was good, an acoustic rail against religious hypocrisy. But that third song.... ugh!

That might be the worst thing ever by Pete (including Iron Man), at least through 2 listens so far. Though it wasn't quite as bad the 2nd time around. However I had intended not to listen to it again.

I debated on whether to get this or not, but Best Buy had it for $10 and dagnabbit, I was curious. Their edition throws in a short live disc along with a short dvd. Doubt I'll watch the dvd again, but surprisingly the live disc (which is from the same show as the dvd) had a very good version of "The Seeker" on it. It helps that they very rarely did that one live in the glory days so it means you don't have many versions to compare it to. (Actually just an Old Grey Whistle Test version is all I can think of.) Also "The Relay" and Pete Empty Glass era b-side "Greyhound Girl" are on it, so it makes for a pretty nice bonus.

I lowered my expectations but I still couldn't help feeling anxious and a bit queasy listening to it for the first time, so afraid it'd stink. It's actually the 4th song "In The Ether" where Pete growls like Waits. Fortunately there are some better moments! "We've Got A Hit" is one of the catchiest things they've ever done. The regular version is only 1:18 (an extended 3:03 is tacked on) as part of the Wire & Glass mini-opera, so you can probably whistle the whole thing while taking a whiz. It's hard to separate how good or bad the album is right now, as it is a goofy good feeling to have new Who, Who 2 or whatever you want to call it to listen to. Even though I'm a cynical Who snob I still can't help but be a little giddy over this and that feeling surprised me. Imperfect, hell yes. Pete does the drumming on 1 song and programs them for several more. (Zach Starkey was unavailable for all but 1 song as he was touring with Oasis during recording. Pete Huntington drums on 7 tracks.) He also plays bass on some, even a wee bit of mandolin, banjo and violin. So some things do sound more like a Pete solo project, though more often than not something from the Who playbook comes out to make it sound more Who-like. There are some hackneyed lyrics, questionable arrangements and a few songs are duds or filler at best. But there are some pretty good songs too. It is amazing how that Who DNA is still present all these years later.

So if you're a Who fan who kept listening to the band after Moon died and say, still find a few songs on the last 2 albums to be good ("Daily Records"!) or can take a few Pete miscues to get the rest that's tolerable to differing degrees of good, go ahead and give it a shot. If you need the windmills, Thunderfingers & pounding drums you already know this isn't for you.

Edited November 7, 2006 by Quincy

[dave9199]

The new album might make people pine for the good old days...of Face Dances & It's Hard. Actally Cry If You Want, the last song on It's Hard, is a favorite. It sounds like an update from the same person in Won't Get Fooled Again...which it is.