Jump to content

did AM used to sound better back in the day?


Recommended Posts

As far as pop/rock music, especially in the 60s, it was mastered to sound good on the radio, which was typically a mono, AM setup. It's why something like CCR sounds so great in a crappy old factory car radio. Same thing with mono records; especially with the Beatles, many prefered the mono albums because the most care was put into that particular format due to its popularity. The Beatles themselves were heavily involved in the final mono mix, but the stereo mix was more of an afterthought, handed over to an engineer or even apprentice in some cases because it wasn't deemed that important. Jazz was way ahead of rock in that respect; stereo had caught on a full decade prior to becoming commonplace for rock recordings.

Edited by Frankie Machine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Tubes were only a small part of the equation"

gotta disagree - because what I think you are hearing on those old braodcasts is, very specifically, a warmth that pervades even their lo-fi sound - and this, from my experience, corresponds very directly to the use of tubes in the signal path.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"Tubes were only a small part of the equation"

gotta disagree - because what I think you are hearing on those old braodcasts is, very specifically, a warmth that pervades even their lo-fi sound - and this, from my experience, corresponds very directly to the use of tubes in the signal path.

i cherish memories of one of our local area fm stations that kept its tube transmitter 10 years after most had discarded. that warm glossy sound was something to behold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

"Tubes were only a small part of the equation"

gotta disagree - because what I think you are hearing on those old braodcasts is, very specifically, a warmth that pervades even their lo-fi sound - and this, from my experience, corresponds very directly to the use of tubes in the signal path.

Yes - tubes on both ends of the experience.

As someone who used to power up and power down a 5000w tube AM transmitter as a livelihood, I can attest to that.

The AM chip in radios for many years cost pennies. AM became such an afterthought for so many manufacturers--they were obligated to put it in to maintain parity with other manufacturers. And they did so as cheaply as possible.

When digital compression came to the fore, we had many conversations about the loss of fidelity at radio conferences. IBOC was seen as the holy radio grail. It brought its own set of problems, especially on FM.

AM on HD Radio sounds pretty good. When it works, that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gosh, i loved that satiny glossy sound........

The big speakers on the really old AM radios made a difference too. I have a 1939 Motorola radio (with cool preset buttons for the national clear-channel stations!), and the sound is great. I'm sure the tubes play a big role, but so does that large speaker.

gregmo

some of those speakers were huge. one, hooked up to a long shortwave wire hooked to my atwanter kent, gave me the worst shock i ever got...

Edited by alocispepraluger102
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...