Jump to content

Herbie in Time Magazine's Top 100


Recommended Posts

Any mainstream recognition like this is positive for the music.

Beyond that, I was struck by the byline -- Wayne Shorter and Joni Mitchell (!) I really would have liked to see the unedited prose those two came up with -- I guarantee that it was more in the clouds than the final product, which went through the layers of at least one Time assigning editor and copy editor. There is, for example, this gem that either survived the original drafts or got truncated by an editor: "For a while there, he was really into dotted 16th notes and minor ninths." Um, ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys almost make me sorry that i started this thread. no one has anything worthwhile to say about this honor?!?

Yeah Herbie!

Sure, he got edged out by the venerable veteran Miley Cyrus, but he opened a big ol' can o' whupass on the Coen Bros., Mariah Carey, George Clooney and Bruce MF Springsteen!

Rockit! :party:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any mainstream recognition like this is positive for the music.

Beyond that, I was struck by the byline -- Wayne Shorter and Joni Mitchell (!) I really would have liked to see the unedited prose those two came up with -- I guarantee that it was more in the clouds than the final product, which went through the layers of at least one Time assigning editor and copy editor. There is, for example, this gem that either survived the original drafts or got truncated by an editor: "For a while there, he was really into dotted 16th notes and minor ninths." Um, ok.

i also thought about that and smiled to myself! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice for Herbie, maybe good for the music, very good for his publicist. Don't know it will mean anything for anybody in the future.

Thanks for posting this anyway.

he doesn't usually have a publicist - maybe does though since the Grammy nomination and win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mitchell-Shorter piece is as shallow as anything we might see from a publicist. Hey, it may well have been written by one of those people.

I had to smile when I read this "And he doesn't really have a need to be understood. So when jazz pianists objected to his moving toward pop, he deflected them easily because he's just so warm."

Years ago, in Rock It's red glare, I asked why he diluted his music, Herbie told me that he had noticed people leaving the club "confused." They didn't understand his music, so he decided to make it simpler and more readily acceptable.

That said, and lest the above be misconstrued as criticism of him, I like Herbie, both as a person, a fellow Mac-nut, and a musician.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deserves accolades, yes, but one of the 100 must influential people? What were they thinking?

Well, they weren't thinking; they were reacting to Herbie's Grammy win, which got tons of attention and suddenly thrust him back into the the center of popular culture, at least for 15 minutes. Collectively, the folks who put together a list like this don't really know anything about music, art, theater, literature, etc., so it becomes a barometer of which creative people have managed to sneak onto the radar of the mainstream, and it becomes an outlet for the list makers to prove how "hip" they are. Except they're not.

But that's why I think this kind of stuff (Herbie's Grammy win; Time magazine, etc.) is good for jazz; it gets the music into the discussion. Not that any single moment will change the world. In the end, it may well end up being meaningless, but if enough little moments can coalesce, it might make a difference. Maybe. Reminds me of the marketing strategy that says any single radio ad, billboard, TV commercial, newspaper ad or whatever is unlikely to move somebody into the "buy" column. But the aggregate has an effect on people. Suddenly, the product "clicks" with consumers and lodges in their mind -- it's the 10th contact that does it, not the first. That's another reflection of the shame of jazz disappearing from TV, radio, general interest magazines, newspapers, etc. Out of sight, out of mind.

Another interesting thing about the list by the way, is that Wynton Marsalis is not on it (unless I missed him). Ten years ago, if a jazz musician would have made the list, it would have been him.

Edited by Mark Stryker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deserves accolades, yes, but one of the 100 must influential people? What were they thinking?

Well, they weren't thinking; they were reacting to Herbie's Grammy win, which got tons of attention and suddenly thrust him back into the the center of popular culture, at least for 15 minutes. Collectively, the folks who put together a list like this don't really know anything about music, art, theater, literature, etc., so it becomes a barometer of which creative people have managed to sneak onto the radar of the mainstream, and it becomes an outlet for the list makers to prove how "hip" they are. Except they're not.

But that's why I think this kind of stuff (Herbie's Grammy win; Time magazine, etc.) is good for jazz; it gets the music into the discussion. Not that any single moment will change the world. In the end, it may well end up being meaningless, but if enough little moments can coalesce, it might make a difference. Maybe. Reminds me of the marketing strategy that says any single radio ad, billboard, TV commercial, newspaper ad or whatever is unlikely to move somebody into the "buy" column. But the aggregate has an effect on people. Suddenly, the product "clicks" with consumers and lodges in their mind -- it's the 10th contact that does it, not the first. That's another reflection of the shame of jazz disappearing from TV, radio, general interest magazines, newspapers, etc. Out of sight, out of mind.

Another interesting thing about the list by the way, is that Wynton Marsalis is not on it (unless I missed him). Ten years ago, if a jazz musician would have made the list, it would have been him.

I completely agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years ago, in Rock It's red glare, I asked why he diluted his music, Herbie told me that he had noticed people leaving the club "confused." They didn't understand his music, so he decided to make it simpler and more readily acceptable.

Wasn't "Rockit" immediately following his "Feets Don't Fail Me Now" phase? No wonder they were walking out: they thought they'd accidentally walked into a disco! ;)

I give Herbie Hancock a lot of slack, though: few musicians' music moves me the way Hancock's does, and AFAIC if the only thing he'd done was Maiden Voyage, that would be enough for me to consider him legendary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't really know what to say - he did some great music at one point, but that point is long past. I also don't see him as hugely influential as some of his pianist peers who didn't veer so hard into the mainstream (Tyner, Evans).

I mean, people like Cecil, Braxton, Ornette, Coltrane, Miles, Bird, and of course those whose influence people are still wrapping their brains around (Bill Dixon, George Russell) - those are 100-listers. But not in Time. Nothing ever was, anyway...

Edited by clifford_thornton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...