Jump to content

Oscar Peterson Mosaic is available for preorder


Ron S

Recommended Posts

The set has very good sound. I have had this set since Tuesday and played half of the discs several times now. The original vinyl of these sounded really good, and so do these transfers and the mastering by Addey.

As for more of the same. . . no, I don't think so. I find this material to be recorded and performed differently than the later recordings. There is a deliberate Nat King Cole Trio feel to much of it (especially, but not limited to the vocal sides) and I think the swing is more traditionally delivered than in the MPS and Pablo sides. (Or rather the Pablo I've heard, I haven't heard too many, I think I've heard all the MPS).

It is in a sense "a lot of the same" though. . . there are some quartet sides (i.e. with a drummer added) but there's disc after disc of the piano-bass-guitar trio format so popular in the forites and early fifties. . . I like it, others may have a different tolerance level.

Edited by jazzbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks guys for your opinions thus far!

Are there a lot of 'alternate takes'? Do they take up a significant proportion of the 7 CDs?

Don't get me wrong - I'm all for alternate takes as well, but when I found out that my Lester Young/Count Basie set had just under 30 alternate takes for a 83 song set (i.e. >35%), well... there can be too much of a good thing I suppose. <_<

Edited by adhoc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, with the Pres, there's no problem with alternates, and that set was exciting in that there were NEW alternates of material circulated for more than half a century!

As for the OP Trio set, there are about four previously unreleased alternates.

Here's the discography info:

http://www.mosaicrecords.com/discography.a...;copies=7%20CDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Just one (hopefully) last quick question.

After looking through the track listing on the Mosaic website and referencing the 'album index' section on this webpage - http://www.mosaicrecords.com/discography.a...;copies=7%20CDs - I went out and picked up 2 CD sets: 'OP plays the Cole Porter songbook' and 'OP plays the George Gershwin songbook'.

I immediately noticed that these CDs were in stereo. Given that this is a set of OP recordings made between '51 and '53, why are they in stereo? To the best of my knowledge, stereo came out in ~1957. What gives?

Or is it because these CDs are on 'Verve' instead of Mercury/Clef? I guess I am showing my unfamiliarity with the OP catalog here - my 'specialty' would be more 1960s hard bop or soul-jazz type recordings. Help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gershwin will have mono recordings on it as well, the second half of the cd if I remember correctly. The mono tracks were recorded in 1952 and the stereo tracks were recorded in 1959.

The stereo material on the Cole Porter disc were also recorded in 1959. So in both cases the idea of the songbook playing was revisited in 1959 for Verve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gershwin will have mono recordings on it as well, the second half of the cd if I remember correctly. The mono tracks were recorded in 1952 and the stereo tracks were recorded in 1959.

The stereo material on the Cole Porter disc were also recorded in 1959. So in both cases the idea of the songbook playing was revisited in 1959 for Verve.

Thanks for that - I'm actually listening to them right now, and haven't yet reached the second half... :unsure:

So I suppose only the 1952 recordings will be in the Mosaic box? Hopefully this pay-to-preview thing I've done will pay off!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, there are no 1959 recordings in the Mosaic set. That's clearly visible on the discographic pages included in one of my posts aboved.

The 1952 material were titled "Plays Cole Porter" and "Plays George Gerswhin." The Verve 1959 sessions were called "Plays the Cole Porter Songbook" and "Plays the George Gershwin Songbook."

Edited by jazzbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

the lps I see at the Salvation Army (and aren't OP, don't see those here, hardly see ANY jazz here) are in bad shape.

You must shop at a different location.

Specialty labels shouldn't reissue stuff you can find at the A&P checkout. But then again, I don't patronize this jiveass label, being that they don't include the original cover art.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the fact that they don't include original album art is indeed a bit of a letdown sometimes. I guess they'd need to pay more to also license the right to re-print the art, though.

As for second hand vinyl - nothing like that available around here... I just know of one shop, but prizes there are normal, 20-35$ for an album, just like a new CD. So Mosaic in the end will be the cheaper way for some of us non-spoilt non-americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the lps I see at the Salvation Army (and aren't OP, don't see those here, hardly see ANY jazz here) are in bad shape.

You must shop at a different location.

Specialty labels shouldn't reissue stuff you can find at the A&P checkout. But then again, I don't patronize this jiveass label, being that they don't include the original cover art.

In this town there's not that type of salvage lp findings, and I believe for the second time (that I've commented) you're exaggerating about Salvation Army bins and Mosaic is far from a "jive-ass label."

If you're a vinyl only guy and don't want to take advantage of the fact that Mosaic gathered all these 10" and 12" discs and presented them in a wonderful sounding package, fine. But that's no reason to slime Mosaic, who may one day be the only decent reissue program on the planet. Maybe you're being tongue in cheek about it but there's no smiley.

I'm sorry, these posts of yours are just rubbing me the wrong way today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this town there's not that type of salvage lp findings, and I believe for the second time (that I've commented) you're exaggerating about Salvation Army bins and Mosaic is far from a "jive-ass label."

If you're a vinyl only guy and don't want to take advantage of the fact that Mosaic gathered all these 10" and 12" discs and presented them in a wonderful sounding package, fine. But that's no reason to slime Mosaic, who may one day be the only decent reissue program on the planet. Maybe you're being tongue in cheek about it but there's no smiley.

I'm sorry, these posts of yours are just rubbing me the wrong way today.

OK, you're right: there SHOULD have been smiley by that post, because I was certainly kidding when I said "jiveass." I'm not knocking the quality of their product.

However, aesthetics are more important to some of us than others. The thought of a label corralling together an artists' rare releases and NOT including the original cover art comes off as incomplete to me. It would only make me want to find the original albums that much more.

And I simply find Oscar Peterson an odd choice for Mosaic, compared to others they've reissued, simply because there's a huge rack of OP albums in every jazz record store. That's all.

On the bright side, I don't buy these things, so be grateful that you have less competition. I won't buy, though, as long as they don't include the cover art.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have to worry about "competition". . . I have been able to buy every set I've wanted, and one's I didn't want at first, easily; I preorder often.

I guess I can see someone wanting all the original artwork, but it's not a concern of mine, I enjoy the music and I don't enjoy the "object" that much. To raise a point: in the case of most Mosaic releases, the material chosen and compiled to be reissued is NOT sitting in the racks of music stores. (Hell, how much jazz is actually sitting in music store racks these days anyway?) Most of this material in this set for example is NOT out on cd and available for sale at this time. And personally I feel this is among the very best of OP's work . . . .wonderful, heartfelt stuff, great work from all players.

As for the aesthetics. . . and incompletion. . .again I think this comes from a vinyl-only perspective. I grew up on vinyl, moved to cds because unless you live in one of the huge cities the choices on cd are much more comprehensive. And I don't feel that there is anything incomplete about Mosaics; the original art is not a part of the musical experience for me, the original art rarely had anything to do with the musicians and their work, and the Mosaic sets include so much documentation of the sessions and artists that they're a bargain in this sense.

So. . . I feel you're missing out, you feel I'm missing out, whatever. I just want to stand up for this set. I'm really not an OP fan of stature, but the music on this set is music I've really enjoyed and will enjoy in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JiveAss label :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee: :beee:

Tell you what... go buy Collectors choice or the non-licensed stuff from Spain....

I'll take the guys in Stamford, Ct.

But then again, I don't patronize this jiveass label, being that they don't include the original cover art.

We are talking about our Dear and Beloved Mosaic here, right?.. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...