Jump to content

Wayne Shorter, "Adam's Apple"


Guy Berger

Recommended Posts

What do people think of this tune/performance? I read one or two reviews of this tune that were pretty dismissive - I guess the melody/harmony are pretty basic and the rhythm is funky. But as far as son-of-Sidewinder tunes, I think it's damn good.

Anybody else agree with me?

Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the Shorter album I've listened most to over the years. Great tune. I recall that the album gets inexplicably dismissed as a Coltrane imitation in one of the standard books on free jazz (Ekkehard Jost's or Litweiler's? I forget). Can't figure that one out, either.

The one bad thing about the album is that the piano sound is even weirder than usual for a RvG production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam's Apple is my favourite among Shorter's Blue Notes: Each track has a different groove and mood, displaying a wide range of what you can do on the tenor in a quartet setting at the time. My first recommendation for an introduction to his work. Playing a little funky was put down only by the purest of the purists - it was part of his palette. What he does with it, sticking closer to thematic improvisation than simply running licks over the changes or going into Coltrane's direction, or playing funky standard licks - that's what makes it interesting.

Edited by mikeweil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC, this has never been / will never be one of Cook-Morton's (PENGUIN GUIDE) favorites. But it was the album which "allowed me" to understand some pretty basic features of Wayne's music... the obliquity, tonal choices, the way he navigates the Coltrane influence... the title track being my main point of entry. These days, I'm more likely to turn to THE SOOTHSAYER or ETCETERA or Moncur's SOME OTHER STUFF when I want to hear Wayne from this period, but ADAM'S APPLE is the first point on the circle for me.

I wonder how things might have turned out, however, had I been a more savvy listener back then. At the time, I'd not heard THE SIDEWINDER and knew nothing of the BN "formula" (if that is indeed what it was) of the day. Perhaps my not having a sense of that larger context was important to my initial appreciation.

Finally, I've always thought Joe Chambers sounds wonderful on this record, and I actually prefer his work with Wayne to Elvin's. Any other thoughts on what Chambers is doing on this session?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I "feel" about Chambers with Wayne (and with Bobby, et al) is that he's a composer at work. He is inside the composition and he's composing his contribution in a way that someone who is "just" a drummer (that is not also a writer and instrumentalist on other instruments) just wouldn't. Ears wide open, mind in charge. That said, on some of the pieces in this release he's just cooking and rocking his ass off, and always with that sensibility, as if he could turn on a dime if he got the signal.

Chambers . . . what a drummer and musical mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody who would dismiss this record has probably never bothered to play side two or the second half of the CD. Even though the first half is like a Wayne Shorter Greatest Hits Album and I love those tunes its Chief Crazy Horse and The Collector that make this one of his best, what more do you need? Interesting writing, great energy. I also love how those tracks point to where he would go on Etcetera which is a classic.

I don't play my 60's Blue Notes as much as I use to but I never grow tired of this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why some folks want to bitch about all the "boogaloo" pieces. I really don't. I mean, ok, yeah, I do, but it seems too simple and too...unmusically astute to lump them all together, like they're all the same. Because they're not.

Then again, some folks just gotta have something to complain about, don't they. But if a tune like "Adam's Apple" is the low point of your day, I think you probably gotta be living a pretty charmed life in the first place, at least on that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why some folks want to bitch about all the "boogaloo" pieces. I really don't. I mean, ok, yeah, I do, but it seems too simple and too...unmusically astute to lump them all together, like they're all the same. Because they're not.

Then again, some folks just gotta have something to complain about, don't they. But if a tune like "Adam's Apple" is the low point of your day, I think you probably gotta be living a pretty charmed life in the first place, at least on that day.

I agree, and I should have put at least air quotes around <<savvy>> in my initial response... <<jaded>> being the more appropriate descriptor anyway. My main point being I was glad to be able to hear ADAM'S APPLE with fresh ears.

I think some of that lack of appreciation represents a certain anti-BN-adulation sentiment. Silly, and has little to do with the music and everything to do with the mythology of marketing.

There's nothing wrong and much, much right with dance music (and don't the original liner notes to this record reference the "contemporary dance"?) and if you leave our considerations of booty-moving -- to employ the parlance of a slightly later era -- you end up with an incomplete and distorted picture anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that back in the day (which is to say, right after "The Sidewinder" became a surprise hit and for the next five years or so) people were sick of all these funky jazz "Sidewinder" knockoffs that were apparently just trying to jump on a perceived bandwagon. THIS far down that road, however, we have the luxury of just judging these tracks as music, and by that measure, "Adam's Apple" comes up smelling pretty darn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that back in the day (which is to say, right after "The Sidewinder" became a surprise hit and for the next five years or so) people were sick of all these funky jazz "Sidewinder" knockoffs that were apparently just trying to jump on a perceived bandwagon. THIS far down that road, however, we have the luxury of just judging these tracks as music, and by that measure, "Adam's Apple" comes up smelling pretty darn good.

I know what you're saying, and agree, but otoh, judging any music as music, apart from any hype that might be in the air at any given time, including the present, is not so much a luxury as it is a challenge. And if it's a challenge that can cause your friends to look at you like you've lost your mind (or worse!), then it's also a challenge that can get you to hearing all musics, including the generally-acknowledged "classics" with fresh ears.

So go for it, I say, down to and including the pop music of today. Challenge yourself to hear it today as you think you might hear it 25 years or so from now, either as 25 years older than you are today, or as somebody who's your age now, 25 years from now.

Hell, it's just sound. Most of it can mean anything you'll let it mean. But you gotta be honest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...