Jump to content


Photo

nokia patents vibrating tattoo


5 replies to this topic

#1 alocispepraluger102

alocispepraluger102

    Super Bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts

Posted 21 March 2012 - 04:20 PM

My link :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


By Ben Rooney

A magnetic vibrating tattoo has to be one of the strangest patent applications in quite a while, but Finnish phone giant Nokia has filed a U.S. patent for just that.

According to the patent application, Nokia is proposing “a material attachable to skin, the material capable of detecting a magnetic field and transferring a perceivable stimulus to the skin, wherein the perceivable stimulus relates to the magnetic field.”

Or to put it another way, a vibrating tattoo.

That magnetic field would interact with the tattoo, causing it to vibrate in a certain way.

Nokia’s thinking is that in much the same way that you can have different ring tones for different callers, so too a future phone could emit a different magnetic field depending who is calling, or if your battery is running low, or you receive an SMS, for example.

It doesn’t have to be a tattoo; the application does talk about just a badge, but it is clear that some thought has been given to actually embedding this thing. There is a lot of talk about using “ink enriched by ferromagnetic or paramagnetic compounds” and how these would be applied.

Why? The application doesn’t specify, but you could imagine situations were it is either very quiet, or conversely very noisy, so some alternative form of altering system could be used, although quite why just vibrating the phone itself isn’t enough…

Hat tip to Unwired View for spotting this.

#2 Pete C

Pete C

    Funkateer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,759 posts

Posted 21 March 2012 - 04:24 PM

I guess they're trying to make up for all the phone business they've lost over the years.

Edited by Pete C, 21 March 2012 - 04:24 PM.


#3 alocispepraluger102

alocispepraluger102

    Super Bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts

Posted 21 March 2012 - 04:29 PM

I guess they're trying to make up for all the phone business they've lost over the years.

:blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink:

#4 Chuck Nessa

Chuck Nessa

    Groovissimo!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,035 posts
  • Location:Whitehall, MI

Posted 21 March 2012 - 06:03 PM

Really smart. Wait and see.

#5 JSngry

JSngry

    While logic makes its demands, emotion lends its voice

  • Moderator
  • 48,376 posts
  • Location:tx, usa

Posted 21 March 2012 - 06:16 PM

By Ben Rooney


Are you sure his name's not Ben Wa?

#6 alocispepraluger102

alocispepraluger102

    Super Bad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts

Posted 21 March 2012 - 07:15 PM

My link


hopefully, apple won't acquire this technology. we'll be burned alive. :party: :party: :party: :party: :party:

Edited by alocispepraluger102, 21 March 2012 - 07:20 PM.




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users