Jump to content

I sure hope they didn't bury the guitar with Django.


Hardbopjazz

Recommended Posts

According to a lot of reports indeed they did ...

In the book "Django Reinhardt - Swing de Paris" they say that a"symbolic guitar" was placed on the coffin to be buried with him.

Is this the "symbolic guitar"?

At any rate, according to gypsy tradition, the belongings of the deceased would be burnt after his death, and so it happened with Django Reinhardt's belongings too. According to history a lot of privately recorded tapes were burnt along with the other objects, so it would have been surprising if his guitar(s?) had been spared. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, who are we to judge about strictly private and personal cases like these that do not affect any third parties or outsiders and do not force anything on these third parties? ;)

Remember how much has been thrown away elsewhere ON PURPOSE for much, much more mundane reasons that have got nothing to at all with cultural traditions (however odd these cultural traditions may appear to be). Particularly in the name of "consumerism" long before such a term was even coined. ;)

A case in point, starting with non-commercially recorded tapes (potentially comparable to those mentioned in my initial post): All those tapes of live music shows (either radio or TV) that used to exist at most major radio/TV organzations for a long time, only to be erased and/or dumped before any collectors or persons truly interested in the musical contents could lay their hand on them and save them for posterity (e.g. at BBC - ask the English around here ...). Now if the (alleged) public purveyors of culture through the (public) media don't see fit to treat those cultural documents with the respect due, why should any individuals be expected to do so?

Edited by Big Beat Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, who are we to judge about strictly private and personal cases like these that do not affect any third parties or outsiders and do not force anything on these third parties? ;)

Remember how much has been thrown away elsewhere ON PURPOSE for much, much more mundane reasons that have got nothing to at all with cultural traditions (however odd these cultural traditions may appear to be). Particularly in the name of "consumerism" long before such a term was even coined. ;)

A case in point, starting with non-commercially recorded tapes (potentially comparable to those mentioned in my initial post): All those tapes of live music shows (either radio or TV) that used to exist at most major radio/TV organzations for a long time, only to be erased and/or dumped before any collectors or persons truly interested in the musical contents could lay their hand on them and save them for posterity (e.g. at BBC - ask the English around here ...). Now if the (alleged) public purveyors of culture through the (public) media don't see fit to treat those cultural documents with the respect due, why should any individuals be expected to do so?

Two stupids don't make a smart Steve!

gregmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was not his only guitar....And yes, one of Django`s guitars was buried with him. The Selmer #503 (aka the 'small mouth') is hanging in the Cité de la Musique in Paris. (Django solely played acoustic

Selmer guitars during his entire career).

I've heard Barney Kessel owned one of Django Reinhardt's guitars, Barney had problems playing chords on it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was not his only guitar....And yes, one of Django`s guitars was buried with him. The Selmer #503 (aka the 'small mouth') is hanging in the Cité de la Musique in Paris. (Django solely played acoustic

Selmer guitars during his entire career).

I've heard Barney Kessel owned one of Django Reinhardt's guitars, Barney had problems playing chords on it....

Barney told me that, too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selmer-Maccaferri, to give the more exact and descriptive name. ;) Not to be confused with other lines that went by the Selmer name.

@Greg M:

I am not normally one to be too lenient with what comes under the general excuse of "cultural" traditions or peculiarities (particularly since this notion is VERY abused today in many areas of everyday life - yes, highly political, I know ... ;)) but in cases like the one described in my initial post I still feel it is not for ANYONE outside the community of those who belong to that community to pass judgment. This is a strictly personal and intra-family thing that was and is ONLY for them to decide.

I regret that loss of documents of art too but I can understand the basic feelings that may have led to that tradition (if a person goes, he goes entirely) - as opposed to what heirs elsewhere (outside that community with its own traditions) throw out for no good reason at all; after all THESE heirs are not bound by any such tradition and beyond what really may be very personal objects that are for no one else to see they act out of a sheer could'nt-care-less attitude. Now would YOU like to see strangers indiscriminately sniff around your belongings when you bow out? Or assuming that - for whatever reasons - you make a will that specific belongings that you have are not to go anywhere else, would you appreciate it if your heirs do the exact opposite? ;)

Edited by Big Beat Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Or assuming that - for whatever reasons - you make a will that specific belongings that you have are not to go anywhere else, would you appreciate it if your heirs do the exact opposite? ;)

I think it depends on the situation. While critics have said that the legend of Kafka wanting everything destroyed and left unpublished is somewhat overblown, most people think that Max Brod did the right thing and didn't carry out Kafka's wishes.

Lately there has been a huge kerfuffle over the Barnes Foundation and the eventual complete overturning of the provisions of his will.

I take a different view and that is people that expect others to follow their instructions -- for decades afterwards -- are unrealistic control freaks, trying to exercise control from beyond the grave. Clearly, having something burnt is a lot easier than setting up some perpetual estate, but quite frankly, if you want it done that badly, burn the stuff yourself before you die. Don't burden your heirs with this stuff and your demands. Let them deal with it as they see fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Or assuming that - for whatever reasons - you make a will that specific belongings that you have are not to go anywhere else, would you appreciate it if your heirs do the exact opposite? ;)

Clearly, having something burnt is a lot easier than setting up some perpetual estate, but quite frankly, if you want it done that badly, burn the stuff yourself before you die. Don't burden your heirs with this stuff and your demands. Let them deal with it as they see fit.

Setting up some perpetual estate - yes, that would reek of being a control freak ... but clear instructions that this or that is DEFINITELY to be destroyed after one's' death and is NOT to go anywhere else, regrettable though it may be for others, well, they ought to be respected and fulfilled. Remember you cannot possibly do this in your lifetime because how many are out there who know exactly they have exactly one week or one month to go and then it's definitely going to be over (and in that case you likely will have other, more pressing things to take care of anyway)? So either you will have to start doing it yourself too long before you bow out (which is not what the intention could possibly be) or you will not have enough time (or health/stamina) left to do it yourself.

No, look at it any way you want - us outsiders peeking in on what someone else may have that we would oh so much like to enjoy after they're gone, we have no business peeking in there unless we formally are okayed to do so ...

Besides, let's not forget the context of the times: In that particular case of Django Reinhardt, even if that tradition of letting one's personal belongings go after the person has gone would not have existed and carried out to that extent, remember that we are talking about a period when Django may have won much acclaim from the general public and society, but the "manouches" at large probably very often still were marginalized in the "majority society" so what incentive could they possibly have had of turning over Django's items to non-"manouche" persons (i.e. "them", not "us") who'd probably make money from it that Django's heirs and family would not have seen much of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Or assuming that - for whatever reasons - you make a will that specific belongings that you have are not to go anywhere else, would you appreciate it if your heirs do the exact opposite? ;)

I think it depends on the situation. While critics have said that the legend of Kafka wanting everything destroyed and left unpublished is somewhat overblown, most people think that Max Brod did the right thing and didn't carry out Kafka's wishes.

Well, maybe he did just what Kafka wanted ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a note to add that Django certainly played electric guitars as well and I'm not sure they were all Selmers equipped with pickups. . . .

django-reinhardt_paul-williams.jpg

Of course, I never met Django...

But he played electric once, during his tour with Duke Ellington in the States, but it wasn't a success and he never played amplified again. Django used Selmer guitars, typical gypsy jazz instruments with an oval sound hole and very high action. The 'Modèle Jazz' ( changed to 'Modèle Django Reinhardt' later), made famous by Django Reinhardt. And the Selmer Maccaferri...

Edited by Cyril
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"he never played amplified again"

this clearly contradicts what i have read (and hear)... here is a discography of his final years which differentiates between electric and acoustic guitars and claims that the 1950 Rome broadcasts and all recordings from 1952/53 are on electric guitar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"he never played amplified again"

this clearly contradicts what i have read (and heard)... here is a discography of his final years which differentiates between electric and acoustic guitars and claims that the 1950 Rome broadcasts and all recordings from 1952/53 are on electric guitar

Exactly. Some time ago I listened to his post-war recordings made in Belgium and they do sound quite amplified/electrified to me (and certainly not for the worse ...).

Some French sources even describe him as a "fervent adept of the amplified guitar" following his 1946 stay in the USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a note to add that Django certainly played electric guitars as well and I'm not sure they were all Selmers equipped with pickups. . . .

django-reinhardt_paul-williams.jpg

Of course, I never met Django...

But he played electric once, during his tour with Duke Ellington in the States, but it wasn't a success and he never played amplified again. Django used Selmer guitars, typical gypsy jazz instruments with an oval sound hole and very high action. The 'Modèle Jazz' ( changed to 'Modèle Django Reinhardt' later), made famous by Django Reinhardt. And the Selmer Maccaferri...

I was under the impression that he played electric guitar after that tour with Duke. . . not exclusively, but some,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...