Jump to content

MLB 2016 Season Thread Of Discussions


JSngry

Recommended Posts

Congrats to Cleveland. And it was good to see Toronto lose. Nothing against the rest of that team, but Donaldson and (especially) Bautista are a couple of arrogant poseurs, and it was good to see them leave empty handed.

And it was satisfying to see Andrew Miller have a great ALCS. He's a class act.

Edited by paul secor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 400
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, paul secor said:

Congrats to Cleveland. And it was good to see Toronto lose. Nothing against the rest of that team, but Donaldson and (especially) Bautista are a couple of arrogant poseurs, and it was good to see them leave empty handed.

And it was satisfying to see Andrew Miller have a great ALCS. He's a class act.

I'll loudly second every word of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland has figured out a way to cover up for a severely deficient starting rotation (injuries or not, its still pretty weak after Kluber) and that is scary.

Hopefully the Cubs offense is back, I feel optimistic they can go to Chicago with a 3-2 lead as long as Lester is sharp. But then they have to beat Kershaw or Hill to get thru to Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/rob-bradford/2016/10/20/inside-story-injury-eventually-helped-end-dav

Now we know why Ortiz never entertained the thought of playing beyond this season, and the truth makes the last four seasons even more remarkable.

Pull quote: "he was essentially playing on stumps".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonderful win by the Cubs last night--so happy for all of my long-suffering Cubs fan friends (they have a big following here in Indiana, as you can imagine), and glad that they were able to take the pennant at Wrigley. Paul Secor, we now get to see the Yankees' former closers square off in the WS... ☺️ And btw, who ya gonna call when your baseball franchise is afflicted with a decades-long "curse"? Theo Epstein, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw on the mlb scroll that 24 of the last 30 World Series were won by the team with the home field advantage.

The problem with that statistic is that unless it went seven games, its impossible for the team with four games at home to have had a home field advantage.  When the Sox swept the Cards and later the Rockies, it was two games at Fenway and two games on the road. Any series that goes 6 is a 3/3 split. And if the road team splits the first two games and then sweeps at home to win it all, then technically they had a home field advantage, 3-2, in a series that the "home team" lost.

So to me the whole question is how many times a seventh game has been won by the visitors.

And relatedly, can the Cubs avoid having to play a seventh game? ;)

I was with Mom this weekend so we got to enjoy the clincher together which was very nice. I know how much this means to her and I've told her that if the Cubs can win the first three, I'll make another trip to Naples next Saturday to watch game 4 with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dan Gould said:

Just saw on the mlb scroll that 24 of the last 30 World Series were won by the team with the home field advantage.

The problem with that statistic is that unless it went seven games, its impossible for the team with four games at home to have had a home field advantage.  When the Sox swept the Cards and later the Rockies, it was two games at Fenway and two games on the road. Any series that goes 6 is a 3/3 split. And if the road team splits the first two games and then sweeps at home to win it all, then technically they had a home field advantage, 3-2, in a series that the "home team" lost.

So to me the whole question is how many times a seventh game has been won by the visitors.

And relatedly, can the Cubs avoid having to play a seventh game? ;)

I was with Mom this weekend so we got to enjoy the clincher together which was very nice. I know how much this means to her and I've told her that if the Cubs can win the first three, I'll make another trip to Naples next Saturday to watch game 4 with her.

Ok, I have no idea, really asking for real...how do the stats break down for the series-winning % of the home team that wins Game 1 vs Road Team that wins Game !?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JSngry said:

Ok, I have no idea, really asking for real...how do the stats break down for the series-winning % of the home team that wins Game 1 vs Road Team that wins Game !?

No idea but its surely a good question.

If everyone is over the heartbreak of the infamous f-ed up All-Star game, my proposal going forward would be that team with best record gets home field in the Series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dan Gould said:

No idea but its surely a good question.

If everyone is over the heartbreak of the infamous f-ed up All-Star game, my proposal going forward would be that team with best record gets home field in the Series. 

That might work, but it could give an advantage to a team that plays in a weaker division that year. It might work just as well to alternate AL/NL each year. I can't remember if that's how it used to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, paul secor said:

That might work, but it could give an advantage to a team that plays in a weaker division that year. It might work just as well to alternate AL/NL each year. I can't remember if that's how it used to go.

It is the way it used to be, switching off year by year.

Regarding your first point though, with the rounds of playoffs, I'm not sure how often the team with the best record gets thru to the big dance. It's really a system that would prevent a wild card team (say Toronto if they had played better) got home field advantage just because their league won the ASG.  Doesn't seem right, if it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Cub bats keep it up I don't see how Cleveland wins.  But if Tomlin and Bauer are effective, Kluber, Miller and their closer could easily extend the heartbreak.

But head to head, who would pick Tomlin or Bauer over Arrieta or Hendricks? Of course that's why they play the games.

All I can really say for sure is that I've got the champagne "flute" already picked out:

vintage-fire-king-coffee-mug-1969-chicag

That's a picture I found online but we've owned the three glass-set since 1969 and I took home from Mom's the outfield version with Jim Hickman's autograph. Seems he was my favorite Cub when I was four years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Soulstation1 said:

30 Years Ago 

Buckner gets all the blame, but he didn't lose the game by himself. It would never have gotten to that point if Schiraldi hadn't given up three successive hits with two outs and Stanley hadn't thrown a wild pitch to score the tying run. And I say that as someone who clearly remembers cursing loudly and throwing something at my TV as I watched the ball go right past Buckner. I knew the Mets were going to win game 7 and the Series then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a long family & friends tradition of Cubbness, but also a smaller but no less real one of Indianicity.

Planning on remaining neutral for the series and to simply enjoy 4-7 good games, but tell you what, John Lester did not make it easy last night, all that jawing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...