Jump to content

EmArcy Records


Teasing the Korean

Recommended Posts

I have accumulated an awful lot of LPs over the decades on the EmArcy label.  

I realized today that I know almost nothing about the label, except that it was a jazz label and a subsidiary of Mercury Records.

So I waddled over to Wikipedia to see what else I could learn, and Wikipedia told me, basically, that EmArcy is a jazz label and a subsidiary of Mercury Records.

It seems that Mercury and Columbia were the only major postwar US labels who dedicated themselves to jazz in any kind of organized, strategic fashion.  Yet while I know about George Avakian, Teo Macero, and Irving Townsend, I know zilch about EmArcy.

So can our esteemed community shed any additional light on the label, or provide a Web link?  Who were the EmArcy masterminds?  Did Mercury treat EmArcy as the folly of some junior executive, or did they recognize jazz as an important American genre?   How did the records sell?  Based on what I've encountered over the years, I would guess they sold fewer copies than Columbia, but more than any of the independents.  

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GA Russell said:

I remember the story Quincy Jones told in his autobiography video.  Mercury hired him to be in charge of their jazz records.  He asked them what they considered a jazz record to be, and they said, "Anything that sells less than 20,000 copies!"

Ha! Mercury, of course, had an impressive classical line, "Mercury Living Presence."  I wonder how those LPs sold?  I also wonder if Mercury's jazz sessions used any of the same engineers as those on the classical recordings.  

There must be jazz artists today who wish they could sell 19,999 copies of their records. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GA Russell said:

TTK, I once read (perhaps in Miles' approved biography) that he urged Cannonball to sign with a label that took jazz seriously, like Blue Note; and was disappointed when Cannon signed with Mercury.

Looking through EmArcy's discography, it would appear that they took jazz "seriously," certainly in comparison to the other majors (except Columbia).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually you can get a good basic overview of a label at Both sides Now. They have listings for all kinds of Mercury eras and subsidiary labels, but oddly enough, nothing about Emarcy?

http://www.bsnpubs.com/discogl-r.html

I always think of "Emarcy" as "Bob Shad", but yes, Jack Tracey took over, although a lot of jazz came on on Mercury itself, iirc.

Mercury was a pretty big label, really, strong pop, jazz, classical, subsidy labels, merged with Phillips, and for the better part of two decades.

Here's a site that thoroughly covers Mercury, including MRC: https://www.jazzdisco.org/mercury-records/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for Mercury itself and its jazz releases, don't overlook their WING subsidiary totally. (Yes this usually was a "budget" label where previous Mercury releases were given a second lease of life but one that allowed many artists to gain wider exposure)

 

15 hours ago, Teasing the Korean said:

I have accumulated an awful lot of LPs over the decades on the EmArcy label.  

I realized today that I know almost nothing about the label, except that it was a jazz label and a subsidiary of Mercury Records.

BTW, have you checked out the sublinks leading to the EmArcy series on this site?

https://microgroove.jp/mercury/

 

Edited by Big Beat Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Big Beat Steve said:

BTW, have you checked out the sublinks leading to the EmArcy series on this site?

https://microgroove.jp/mercury/

Thanks, I did not know about that site. 

I do have some Wing reissues. Most are straight reissues, but some appear to be Pickwick-like grab bag collections.  I could be mis-remembering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know very much about the Emarcy label but Clifford Brown’s recordings are legendary of course. Also, my favorite recordings by Chet Baker are on Emarcy. His sessions ‘In Paris’ are so incredibly beautiful and I enjoy those more than much of his more popular recordings. The boxed set to me has too much alternates, false starts etc. so I bought the 4 volumes on cd instead. And that is some beautiful music!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...