Jump to content

Coltrane: Both Directions At Once (lost album)


Sandman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

16 hours ago, B. Clugston said:

Lewis Porter writes about Both Directions at once, including a theory that someone other than Coltrane wrote “11386”

Thanks for the heads up on this. This is the best analysis I’ve heard about why the material wasn’t released. I was hoping he would discuss 11383. though fantastic, it doesn’t sound like the band is familiar with the song and I doubt it would ever have been released on an album. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Scott Dolan said:

Going to listen to it in the morning. Hopefully without jaded ears. 

I too hope to listen with unbiased ears when the discs arrive later today.  I have the feeling the music will be good, but as you said earlier in the thread nothing we haven't heard already.  I hope this is truly a worthy addition to the canon.

 

22 minutes ago, Stefan Wood said:

The whole group is coming out swinging.  Nothing held back.

  Interesting, because the New Yorker review I read, it seemed the reviewer Richard Brody felt the music was on low boil.  He felt Bob Thiele was appealing to commercial concessions, in the vein of Ballads and John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman, but I don't see how that's accurate judging from hearing the link of "Untitled 11383"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy Pete Gallio told me a long time ago that the point of hearing live Coltrane was not to hear anything new, but just to hear that "thing" done again, not quite like it had been done before or would be done after. To just enjoy having one more moment of "that" to be in.

That's pretty much where I am with this. No revelations expected, just one more moment of "that thing" to enjoy a few times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, JSngry said:

My buddy Pete Gallio told me a long time ago that the point of hearing live Coltrane was not to hear anything new, but just to hear that "thing" done again, not quite like it had been done before or would be done after. To just enjoy having one more moment of "that" to be in.

That's pretty much where I am with this. No revelations expected, just one more moment of "that thing" to enjoy a few times.

The same could be said about many (any?) of the greats, though I get where your friend was coming from. So many people say that Trane was in constant flux. For me (and I guess your friend), everything he played was an extension of "that", as you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constant flux is a bit of a "Romantic" notion, but sure, there were pivot points. But they were just that, points, dots. And in between those, the dots had to be connected in real time, and that's where the "more of that thing" comes in, just the everyday motion of everyday life for that band and those players. I love the dots, but I love the connective tissue just as much, especially when you start to feel the gravitational pull of the next point beginning to exert itself.

You can get quantum about it (and quantum is what Trane was after, I'm convinced), but hell, if you just want to take it out for a Sunday drive, any of it, it works like that too. Greatness will handle the demands, light or heavy, always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JSngry said:

My buddy Pete Gallio told me a long time ago that the point of hearing live Coltrane was not to hear anything new, but just to hear that "thing" done again, not quite like it had been done before or would be done after. To just enjoy having one more moment of "that" to be in.

That's pretty much where I am with this. No revelations expected, just one more moment of "that thing" to enjoy a few times.

Yes, there's nothing revealing, just hard playing and creatively executed. Even the filler is killer.

3 hours ago, CJ Shearn said:

I too hope to listen with unbiased ears when the discs arrive later today.  I have the feeling the music will be good, but as you said earlier in the thread nothing we haven't heard already.  I hope this is truly a worthy addition to the canon.

 

  Interesting, because the New Yorker review I read, it seemed the reviewer Richard Brody felt the music was on low boil.  He felt Bob Thiele was appealing to commercial concessions, in the vein of Ballads and John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman, but I don't see how that's accurate judging from hearing the link of "Untitled 11383"

Brody must have been drinking when he wrote the review.  Low boil????????????  No way in hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stefan Wood said:

Yes, there's nothing revealing, just hard playing and creatively executed. Even the filler is killer.

Brody must have been drinking when he wrote the review.  Low boil????????????  No way in hell.

Well, it appears the review, though he praises the music on one level, his expectations were that the music was going to be on the same level as the live performances of the period which I think, is unfair. 

 

" Whatever reticence a listener might experience with the new album isn’t musicological but emotional: the spiritual temperature of the music is lower, its moments of glorious invention have a logical and inviting air that never quite matches the self-exploring, self-transcending volatility of Coltrane’s very best recordings, whether made in concert or in the studio. (It’s impossible to know whether the quartet just didn’t reach its heights of inspiration that day, or whether, under the influence of Thiele and related commercial considerations, they deliberately restrained their most extreme energies.) “Both Directions at Once” is a marker of Coltrane’s work at the time rather than the very best of it. It’s as if the band were displaying what it is that they do when they do it, without quite doing it. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stefan Wood said:

The whole group is coming out swinging.  Nothing held back.

Which begs the question, when DID they hold back? I mean, serious. When? Because those tapes are yet to be released. 

 

3 hours ago, CJ Shearn said:

I too hope to listen with unbiased ears when the discs arrive later today.  I have the feeling the music will be good, but as you said earlier in the thread nothing we haven't heard already.  I hope this is truly a worthy addition to the canon.

 

  Interesting, because the New Yorker review I read, it seemed the reviewer Richard Brody felt the music was on low boil.  He felt Bob Thiele was appealing to commercial concessions, in the vein of Ballads and John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman, but I don't see how that's accurate judging from hearing the link of "Untitled 11383"

Whether Ballads was a “commercial concession” is a debate I’ll stay out of, but that album is arguably one of the best the Classic Quartet ever recorded. Bar none. 

Now, I will humbly concede that if you hit me up for a spur of the moment “top five Coltrane Quartet albums” Ballads likely wouldn’t be mentioned. But it damned sure SHOULD be! It’s funny. They didn’t cut loose on that session, nor did they make any of those tunes their own. But somehow they made them “perfect”. Just. Fucking. Perfect. 

Along with Crescent (due to it being overshadowed by A Love Supreme in the ‘64 canon), Ballads is THE most overlooked and underappreciated albums that band ever recorded, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JSngry said:

My buddy Pete Gallio told me a long time ago that the point of hearing live Coltrane was not to hear anything new, but just to hear that "thing" done again, not quite like it had been done before or would be done after. To just enjoy having one more moment of "that" to be in.

That's pretty much where I am with this. No revelations expected, just one more moment of "that thing" to enjoy a few times.

I heard Coltrane live fairly often in '63-'64 in Chicago, literally from close up (Elvin's bass drum at McKie's, if you were sitting opposite the band at the bar, was a little more than the width of the bar from your head), and what no recording I know of captured was the relative dynamics involved -- how loud the band's "loud" eventually was after 40 minutes or so  (and I also mean how intense) versus the level at which say they might begin a particular piece like "Mr. P.C." Subjective factors are involved here -- the intensity of the music-making per se adding to the sense that the end of everyone's tether had been reached -- but the only thing I've ever experienced that approached it  along those lines was Albert Ayler in person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Larry Kart said:

I heard Coltrane live fairly often in '63-'64 in Chicago, literally from close up (Elvin's bass drum at McKie's, if you were sitting opposite the band at the bar, was a little more than the width of the bar from your head), and what no recording I know of captured was the relative dynamics involved -- 

There's a record by The Grateful Dead, Live Dead, which at one point I was completely obsessed about. I loved the thing (and still do kind of). Yet it never came up to the live performances I had heard. I used to fiddle about with electronics and had a spare, old micro stereo system and I botched up a faux quadrophonic effect with a bit of simple circuitry which created a "new" pair of channels made out of (as I remember it) the stereo channels added together and subtracted from one other. Suddenly I was in the middle of a live concert - and the experience was comparable to what I'd heard.

Sacrilege....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Scott Dolan said:

Which begs the question, when DID they hold back? I mean, serious. When? Because those tapes are yet to be released. 

 

Whether Ballads was a “commercial concession” is a debate I’ll stay out of, but that album is arguably one of the best the Classic Quartet ever recorded. Bar none. 

Now, I will humbly concede that if you hit me up for a spur of the moment “top five Coltrane Quartet albums” Ballads likely wouldn’t be mentioned. But it damned sure SHOULD be! It’s funny. They didn’t cut loose on that session, nor did they make any of those tunes their own. But somehow they made them “perfect”. Just. Fucking. Perfect. 

Along with Crescent (due to it being overshadowed by A Love Supreme in the ‘64 canon), Ballads is THE most overlooked and underappreciated albums that band ever recorded, IMO. 

I used to have the deluxe edition of Ballads, I preferred the original album over the alternates.  Whether that album was a commercial concession I do not think so personally, but listening now to disc 2 of Both Directions At Once, just the first spin, but the alts are of value, especially "Impressions" takes 1 and 2, in a very condensed space, Trane really goes for it, nothing we haven't heard already, but nice nonetheless.  This album is not earth shaking the way the PR said, great marketing of course, but it's a nice supplement to what this band did best.  Those are my first impressions (pun intended).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought the deluxe version and have been through disc one a couple of times.  It is very enjoyable stuff - to me, something of an extension of the work on Atlantic.

In case anyone is interested, you can use iTunes to "edit out" the announcement of take numbers, which I found (slightly) annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...