Jump to content

What the difference between a jazz big band and jazz orchestra?


Hardbopjazz

Recommended Posts

I may not be the best guy to comment, since I tended to give fairly little attention to big band/orchestra--other than Ellington.

But I would say this.  In the golden age of the big band, there seemed to be a pretty standard setup--4 or 5 saxes (with some doubling on clarinet), 3 or 4 trumpets, 3 trombones, guitar (though not always), piano, bass, drums.  You usually had 15-19 musicians.  This has not even changed much, generally speaking.  But you did get smaller groups like the Davis Birth of the Cool nonet and some of the early Gil Evans albums, such Gil Evans & Ten.  Such ensembles were not just smaller, but generally more unusual in instrumentation--tuba, french horn, flute, violin, extra percussion, etc.  We've some pretty notable bands of this sort, such as those by Carla Bley, George Gruntz, and for that matter the Mingus Orchestra.  These better fit the concept of "orchestra."

In addition, you have all those string orchestra albums; many of them seem entirely like mistakes, but there are some genuine classics too.

Another variation is how the big band (however it is composed) is used to back a single soloist--such as Gil Evans with Miles and Cannonball Adderley and the band behind Coltrane on Africa/Brass.

  

 

Edited by Milestones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do university-level ensembles (jazz orchestras vs. big bands) fit into this?

By which (I suspect) where there are universities with jazz orchestras (if any), if so then I'm sure there's probably a bit of a more distinct distinction -- though I'm not knowledgeable enough to guess precisely what that difference is.

With NON-collegiate groups, though, I'm sure there are marketing considerations at play -- as in the demographics of target audiences, and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the term "orchestra" was often used in jazz to lend more credibility to an ensemble, rather than an indication of its size or instrumentation. Ellington's earliest orchestra had 10 members, increasing to 14 in the early 30's and 16 by the mid-40's. In contrast, (Charles and Burton) Fischer's Jazz Orchestra and "Illinois Jacquet and His Orchestra" were actually septets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marketing and expectations. If you go to hear a "big band", you're probably expecting a program of swinging standards and blues and originals, nothing else. If you go to hear a "jazz orchestra", you're probably expecting less emphasis on standards, more original material, and an engagement with different compositional conceits that just 4/4 swing.

But, really, the same players can and do usually play both gigs without blinking. So it's really about marketing the image to who the target audience is going to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is largely semantics.  It's funny how so many of the classic big bands were actually dubbed as orchestras--everything from Count Basie to Glenn Miller.  I think there is a considerable element of pretension here.  A truer hybrid of jazz and classical came much later, and some are quite interesting and successful--as I pointed out in my first response.  Also, these groups and works ARE rather different from "big band."

Or what do you make of something like Steve Turre's Rhythm Within, with most tracks featuring 12 players including a lot of guys on trombones and/or "shells" and lots of percussion.  I see virtually no resemblance to big band music as it is usually conceived.  What of Gunther Schuller's giant ensemble playing Mingus' Epitaph?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, JSngry said:

Marketing and expectations. If you go to hear a "big band", you're probably expecting a program of swinging standards and blues and originals, nothing else. If you go to hear a "jazz orchestra", you're probably expecting less emphasis on standards, more original material, and an engagement with different compositional conceits that just 4/4 swing.

 

Was the underlined word INTENTIONAL? :D

Or just a Freudian lapse?

As for semantics, I have always read and understood "orchestra" in a jazz context to be a synonym for a "big band" if used correctly.
Your "today's" distinction between "big bands" leaning a bit more towards older styles and "orchestras" being anything else as well, including more experimental forms of jazz, makes sense.

BUT - from the 20s classic jazz period up to R&B combos and elsewhere through the decades there have always been bands labeled as "orchestras" that were maybe a bit larger than the typical 4-5-6 piece combo ("small band") but certainly not big enough to be considered a REAL "big band" or "orchestra". Sometimes this actually sounded a bit pretentious. So once you are aware of this the terms become interchangeable and not quite that meaningful again and may just as well be just a marketing gimmick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Big Beat Steve said:

Was the underlined word INTENTIONAL? :D

Or just a Freudian lapse?

I don't understand the question.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conceit

1a(1) : a result of mental activity : thought

(2) : individual opinion

b : favorable opinion especially : excessive appreciation of one's own worth or virtue … the landlord's conceit of his own superior knowledge … — Adam Smith

2 : a fancy item or trifle Conceits were fancy desserts, made either of sugar … or pastry.— Francie Owen

3a : a fanciful idea

b : an elaborate or strained metaphor The poem abounds in metaphysical conceits.

c : use or presence of such conceits in poetry

d : an organizing theme or concept … found his conceit for the film early …— Peter Wilkinson … the historian's conceit that the past is forever prologue …— Leon V. Sigal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think you do understand after all, and I know too that it all amounts to one single letter, but aren't "conceit" and "being conceited" a bit too (linguistically) close for comfort here? ... hmmm ...
"Concept" would have done the trick and served its purpose of getting the message across, unless it is a matter of showing off linguistically (in which case ... but oh well ... talk about coming full circle and so on ... ;))

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conceited

So back to the question on hand ... ;)

Edited by Big Beat Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Count Basie and his Jazz Orchestra" would have been pretty redundant.

I also noticed that it's called "The Jazz at Lincoln Center Orchestra, which is all about branding marketing.

Now, we did have the "National Jazz Ensemble" under the direction of Chuck Israels, but that never really got off the ground. Who cares about an "ensemble" anyway?

I do see that there is something called the "National Youth Jazz Orchestra", which should probably apply hyphenation because I'll be damned if I can confidently glean what those four words in that particular order really mean.

"Big Band" has a pretty fixed meaning these days. It's something that would they ever come back and then they sorta did and now you can find them pretty much anywhere there's enough players, without enough gigs, to form one.

"Jazz Orchestra" is....not going to be that.

2 minutes ago, aparxa said:

And when in doubt, use both.

9de59b328011b6b1ca3667877f811841.jpg

There you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...