Jump to content

A Guide to Copyright Duration in the USA


Brad

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Teasing the Korean said:

Or, for those who don't want to click the link:  Copyright duration will continue to be extended whenever Mickey Mouse is about to slip into the public domain.

That's all you need to know.  

Add "in the US" to your post about Mickey Mouse and add "in the EU whenever the Beatles are about to slip into the public domain" and you've got it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe — but I’m no expert — that copyright protection in the EU for sound recordings lasts 50 years. If so, unless there is an exception, I don’t believe the Beatles’ songs pre 1969 are protected.  I’m happy to be corrected if I’m wrong on this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brad said:

I believe — but I’m no expert — that copyright protection in the EU for sound recordings lasts 50 years. If so, unless there is an exception, I don’t believe the Beatles’ songs pre 1969 are protected.  I’m happy to be corrected if I’m wrong on this. 

To sum up the gist of it, in 2012 the European copyright laws were changed and the protectionn period that had been 50 years up to that period was extended to 70 years from the time the law was passed sometime in 2012. But the law did not become applicable retropactively. I.e. released recordings (IIRC previously unissued recordings are a differnet kettle but I think it's a grey zone the way this is actually handled) that were 50 or more years old (from the date of recording) by that date in 2012 remained in the public domain whereas those that were not yet 50 years old will only fall into the public domain after 70 years have passed. As Cliff Richard and Paul McCartney were instrumental in getting this copyright extension in law (guess to protect which recordings) this lw has often been referred to as the "Cliff Richard" or "Paul McCartney" law over here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brad said:

I believe — but I’m no expert — that copyright protection in the EU for sound recordings lasts 50 years. If so, unless there is an exception, I don’t believe the Beatles’ songs pre 1969 are protected.  I’m happy to be corrected if I’m wrong on this. 

They increased the copyright protection to 70 years starting with recordings made after January 1, 1963, which just so happens to be right before the Beatles hit the scene.

Funny fact - they missed the fact that the Beatles released a 45 rpm single before their cutoff date, so "Love Me Do” and its B-Side, “P.S. I Love You", are in the public domain in the EU. As such, a couple of PD labels have issued them on compilations. :)

https://consequenceofsound.net/2013/01/anyone-in-europe-can-now-sell-the-beatles-love-me-do/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kevin Bresnahan said:

They increased the copyright protection to 70 years starting with recordings made after January 1, 1963, which just so happens to be right before the Beatles hit the scene.

Funny fact - they missed the fact that the Beatles released a 45 rpm single before their cutoff date, so "Love Me Do” and its B-Side, “P.S. I Love You", are in the public domain in the EU. As such, a couple of PD labels have issued them on compilations. :)

https://consequenceofsound.net/2013/01/anyone-in-europe-can-now-sell-the-beatles-love-me-do/

Did their earlier German recordings slip into the public domain also?  Not that I would ever want to hear them again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Big Beat Steve said:

To sum up the gist of it, in 2012 the European copyright laws were changed and the protectionn period that had been 50 years up to that period was extended to 70 years from the time the law was passed sometime in 2012. But the law did not become applicable retropactively. I.e. released recordings (IIRC previously unissued recordings are a differnet kettle but I think it's a grey zone the way this is actually handled) that were 50 or more years old (from the date of recording) by that date in 2012 remained in the public domain whereas those that were not yet 50 years old will only fall into the public domain after 70 years have passed. As Cliff Richard and Paul McCartney were instrumental in getting this copyright extension in law (guess to protect which recordings) this lw has often been referred to as the "Cliff Richard" or "Paul McCartney" law over here.

Thanks for the corrections Steve and Kevin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

16 minutes ago, Teasing the Korean said:

Did their earlier German recordings slip into the public domain also?  Not that I would ever want to hear them again...

As far as I know - yes. The recording date places them all in the 50-year P.D. department.
At any rate, I don't think these recordings (most of them with Tony Sheridan) were ever OOP for any lengthy period from sometime in the early to mid-70s onwards. There have been tons of repackaged reissues of them, many on labels that have nothing to do with Polydor, the original label. There even is a fairly recent vinyl reissue of the tracks on LP on a label called Wax Love Records (sounds very PD-ish) that reproduced the cover artwork of the original Tony Sheridan/Beatles "My Bonnie" 45.

https://www.discogs.com/de/Tony-Sheridan-And-The-Beat-Brothers-Tony-Sheridan-and-The-Beat-Brothers-My-Bonnie/release/13498728

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how does the EU system work in terms of stuff slipping into the Public Domain (PD), if it's more than 50 years old, and if it's NEVER been issued?

And does WHERE it was recorded have any bearing on how the EU "PD" system treats it?  Meaning does the EU system treat recordings made here in the US (that have never been released in any way), the same as unreleased recordings made in any of the EU member states?

 

Like theoretically, let's say that there was a recording made in Englewood Cliffs, NJ on August 16th, 1968 (which is over 50 years ago), and it's never been issued.

Could somebody release that in Europe, and would it be legal?  Only theoretically speaking, of course. :ph34r:

 

(I know this thread is about US copyright law -- but I've always wondered about how the new EU laws work, which I have an understanding of, but I'm not 100% I'm right about.)

Edited by Rooster_Ties
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
8 minutes ago, mjzee said:

I know exactly what they're talking about. Look at Amazon's digital music offerings. Who makes money off of an album like this one: https://www.amazon.com/Hank-Mobley/dp/B0048W7H0M/ref=sr_1_14?keywords=hank+mobley&qid=1558553938&rnid=2941120011&s=dmusic&sr=1-14 ? I'll tell you who - Amazon. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bresna said:

I know exactly what they're talking about. Look at Amazon's digital music offerings. Who makes money off of an album like this one: https://www.amazon.com/Hank-Mobley/dp/B0048W7H0M/ref=sr_1_14?keywords=hank+mobley&qid=1558553938&rnid=2941120011&s=dmusic&sr=1-14 ? I'll tell you who - Amazon. :)

I may be wrong (I often am) but I believe that though the recording may be pd in Europe the composition is not and the Arlen estate is owed money from the European record company.  Good luck with collecting that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...