Jump to content

John Coltrane - Love Supreme: Live in Seattle


Pim

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 269
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Very early impressions - and keep in mind that all of this is visceral rather than considered, because my opinion could easily shift upon re-listen:

This is a remarkable document that I feel tremendously privileged to have heard. I also think that mileage may vary. This is closer to The Olatunji Concert or Offering than it is the Antibes A Love Supreme. By this I mean that the imperfection of the recording is just distracting enough to color my view of the music, and insofar as Coltrane's voice is the focal point of the suite, having him recessed so far into the background sort of untethers things. I'd almost trade the sound on this for Olatunji, because although Olatunji is extremely harsh, the energy of the performance communicates the intentions of the performers very clearly.

There's that aphoristic phrase (that I cannot source - maybe someone else will remember) about Albert Ayler's recordings being mere "rumors" of the real thing, and that's kind of how I feel about these archival Coltrane recordings. The recording is itself something that is meant to be consumed, because the actual live energy is lost to time. In the case of something like Olatunji, you can (a) choose to listen selectively, mentally blocking out all the clipping and filling in the blanks when it comes to inaudible piano, bass, etc., or (b) you can listen to Olatunji for what it is - i.e., a monolith of poorly recorded free jazz that that is played with virtuosity and passion. It's up to you. Most of the time, I choose the latter.

That being said, the rhythm section on the Seattle A Love Supreme is recorded in stunning clarity, the restoration and mastering are exceptionally clean, and there are episodes of music here that are truly worthy of the hagiographic hype. Pharoah's solo on "Acknowledgement" is astonishing, in main because there isn't much other opportunity to hear the Pharoah of this vintage square his extended technique-focused playing into a groove this insistent. Carlos Ward's solo on "Resolution" is also a standout, superficially reminiscent of Dolphy on the Vanguard recordings - but much more abstract. There is also a lot of period appropriate filigree - including miscellaneous percussion on "Acknowledgement" and a battery of bass duos - that feels well-integrated.

Under certain circumstances, I'd think that this was the best "new" Coltrane release in decades. At this moment - and I'm ashamed to even be typing this - I could use slightly less Elvin Jones and a lot more Trane. A Love Supreme may have been a collective effort, but that effort hinged on a kind of balance between pieces that feels - in this moment - absent on this recording. As it is, this is "just" a really, really good live Coltrane record - and a worthy appendix to Live In Seattle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shit be gettin hot up in there, that's all/what I hear.

From a saxophonistical standpoint, though, if you can hear Pharoah on "Acknowledgement" and not hear what Trane was doing in his 2nd "Transition" solo has less clean ears than I do. Those guys were already working together before they started working together, if you know what I mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, sidewinder said:

Mine’s arrived - sounding very good indeed. Really like the way that Elvin’s drums are captured.

Mine arrived. Looked quite dirty with some powdery  white marks and  debris stuck down in several places ,some were probably white dusty finger prints. Then I discovered heavy multiple small scratches at the beginning of side 2 - sounded for 49 revolutions !!  Poorest new pressed record I've seen in a while. Going back....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Clunky said:

Mine arrived. Looked quite dirty with some powdery  white marks and  debris stuck down in several places ,some were probably white dusty finger prints. Then I discovered heavy multiple small scratches at the beginning of side 2 - sounded for 49 revolutions !!  Poorest new pressed record I've seen in a while. Going back....

Sorry to hear that. Considering the cost of these is 3x the CD, pretty damn poor of Optimal.

Edited by sidewinder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like it's always a scolding even if/when you agree with him. :(

However...he is right to call out Transition... that's where McCoy seems to be a lot here. Not that record, but that place, that zone  Elvin too, for that matter.

But after a few more listens... I'm thinking that we should all chuck the narrative go back and check out John Gilmore on his early NYC days (if not a bit earlier)...if nothing else for the technical things  he was already virtuostic with before 1965. You can't overlook Ayler, of course, but Gilmore was so damn systematic about how he did it...he knew how to get there with or without the rapture, and you know, these things don't play themselves, these tenors don't.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I feel like it's always a scolding even if/when you agree with him." :(

And a scolding from way up on high, too.

 Also, he sure likes to gaseously pump up the volume: "A Love Supreme is the greatest long-form composition of American Classical Music." Really? lots of Roscoe Mitchell, for one. John Carter? More nominees are welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Larry Kart said:

"I feel like it's always a scolding even if/when you agree with him." :(

And a scolding from way up on high, too.

 Also, he sure likes to gaseously pump up the volume: "A Love Supreme is the greatest long-form composition of American Classical Music." Really? lots of Roscoe Mitchell, for one. John Carter? More nominees are welcome.

Seconds on John Carter - listened to “Fields” the other day

seems Iverson needs to prove he is “in the know”. To my ears and eyes he’s another guy stuck in the historical “narrative”. I know he’s not American but I give you Agusti Fernandez for long form composition and group collective improvisation. Ethan would be surprised to know he exists, I think - and he plays the same piano Iverson plays except far better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that 'long-form composition' is very overrated as a thing generally and antithetical to jazz specifically and that I like 'jazz' just fine as a name for something that doesn't need to be described as 'classical' 'cause maybe it ain't.  Maybe nothing really is and 'classical' is just not a very useful way of seeing or hearing anything.  Or maybe Iverson just pisses me off so much sometimes that I just want to disagree no matter what.

Edited by danasgoodstuff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, danasgoodstuff said:

I'd say that 'long-form composition' is very overrated as a thing generally and antithetical to jazz specifically and that I like 'jazz' just fine as a name for something that doesn't need to be described as 'classical' 'cause maybe it ain't.  Maybe nothing really is and 'classical' is just not a very useful way of seeing or hearing anything.  Or maybe Iverson just pisses me off so much sometimes that I just want to disagree no matter what.

Maybe correct - personally much more interested in long form group (small or large) improvisation. In other words, can the band create for an hour or even more at a time? If they incorporate some notated materials (like Tyshawn Sorey’s Pillars) that’s great as well. 

Edited by Steve Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JSngry said:

But after a few more listens... I'm thinking that we should all chuck the narrative go back and check out John Gilmore on his early NYC days (if not a bit earlier)...if nothing else for the technical things  he was already virtuostic with before 1965. You can't overlook Ayler, of course, but Gilmore was so damn systematic about how he did it...he knew how to get there with or without the rapture, and you know, these things don't play themselves, these tenors don't.

Interesting...

We had a lively thread on this topic back in 2007.

Which particular pre-'65 Gilmore recordings/solos would you cite in this regard?  And how comfortable are you with the dating of Gilmore's work with Sun Ra circa '62-'64 when you begin to look closely at this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...