Blindfold Test #14 discussion
#1
Posted 06 July 2004 - 08:58 PM
A general comment (perhaps unnecessary--ignore it if you like). This BFT is a little different from the last few ones. There's one very famous player among these tracks; but as for the rest I don't expect a lot of i.d.s (though I suspect you guys will pleasantly surprise me with some bullseyes nonetheless....). As with JSngry's BFT (my favourite one so far!), the main point of the compilation is to elicit discussion of the music itself rather than to test knowledge of well-known musicians' stylistic signatures.
Have fun! --N
#5
Posted 07 July 2004 - 07:15 AM
So, let´s face the music itself as we´ve been suggested. Though I was thinking about giving it a few more listenings to set things right and digest the music properly, I´ll throw myself onto the flames and post my answers now.
I apologize for any inconsistency I may say from a musical theory point of view… I´m as ignorant as I´ll show here... ;)
1.- Surprising start for this BFT. Funny instrumentation (strings, bass clarinet, percussion) and curious arrangement. The main theme (in all its variations) is a very slippery, but somehow repetitive one. ***1/2
2.- Brief piano solo track. Interesting right hand fast lines interrupted with sudden stops. Left hand alternates between shocking bass chords and brief responses to the right hand and intriguing scales (I think). I wouldn´t dare bring a name, but the fierceness of the playing in some passages reminded me of Cecil Taylor and the abstraction in other passages reminded me of Paul Bley. A big :tup for this one! ****1/2
3.- Beautiful opening statement (piano & reed). More strings (cello). More solo piano (much more conventional than in the previous track). More soprano sax and cello. A very “cool” track! ***
4.- Hey, the temperature is rising! How many reeds are there? Good solos and interaction between horns. I really dug the beat the drummer and the bassist are bringing! But finally, and though the track´s quite long, I wish it had “exploded” more, I mean had had a higher “climax”. It left me with a sense of unfinished work… ***1/2
5.- I´m afraid this is not my kind of stuff. How long will it take to start the party? Two minutes and nothing has happened. Moreover, I don´t like the rhythm section (neither that rocky bass support, nor that tedious percussion). The trumpet and the bass solos don´t tell me a lot and the reed´s sound is too “cool” for me. **1/2
6.- More West-Coast oriented jazz. Languid piano. A bit static and unswinging track, but this time I dug the sax player (Jimmy Giuffre??? Lee Konitz???). ***
7.- Geez, I think I can recognize a few notes of a Monk tune at the opening! I´ll check it later. Now there´s a very swingin´ rhythm section. Hey, that piano smokes! Love that interaction between the piano and the sax at around 5:30. Great music. ****
8.- Relaxed piano-bass duo to chill it. I´m afraid I should know the tune but nothing pops up! I´m not very inspired this morning, I´m afraid. The musicians sound familiar, should I know them? ***1/2
9.- No idea on who´s playing here… once again! Notwithstanding, something here sounds like some CD I have. ***1/2
10.- Shockin´ introduction, with that bass soloing, those powerful drums and that big toned sax. Melody is more than OK for me. Maybe my favourite track so far. My wild guess: RRK, because this one has the same groove and many non-jazz influences as there are in some RRK recordings and I find many resemblances of his tone. ****1/2
11.- Nice piano trio. Wait a minute: there are some passages where it looks like there are two pianists (0:35-1:10; 2:35-3:10). If there´s only one, his hands are more than independent! ****
12.- Looks like a pianist date featuring a saxophonist and a trumpet player. The general feeling is that the pianist is the leader: his sound dominates. Dig it! ***1/2
13.- More piano trio. Don´t like neither the sound of the bass nor the drummer´s while playing snare (no problem with cymbals). Just OK for me. ***
14.- Oh, I should know this beautiful tune! Beautiful guitar playing. Very nice. ****
The overall impression is that it´s a well balanced blindfold test.
Much piano, reeds, some strings… Umm, in fact there´s just a little brass featured.
Some cool jazz, some more swingin´ jazz...
And it´s not as “outside” as I was expecting from Nate, an avant-garde expert, AFAIK. I would say most of the tracks are “inside” jazz, though many of them near the limits! ;)
Thanks again for a great BFT!!!
:tup :tup :tup
#6
Posted 07 July 2004 - 10:46 AM
I am still working on the rest. A very demanding bunch - some nice sounds - some pretty awful to my untutored ear. ^_^
This post has been edited by tooter: 07 July 2004 - 10:55 AM
#7
Posted 07 July 2004 - 11:11 AM
Gary:
Quote
Thanks, EKE BBB, for the responses! They're interesting reading indeed, with some comments closer to the mark than you might suppose.... No, I avoided the really avant stuff in the collection simply because I thought it'd make the compilation incoherent. Also because I tend to think that music in the zone I've sketched out here doesn't get its fair share of attention: it's not "avant-garde", not "mainstream", & so it tends not to attract a lot of critical ink.
This post has been edited by Nate Dorward: 07 July 2004 - 11:12 AM
#8
Posted 07 July 2004 - 02:30 PM
And track 14 really cracked me up. Reminds me of a disk I have ... will have to check that out.
For now, thanks for providing the soundtrack for a sh*tload of work I have to do. I'll try to get back to this thread on the weekend.
Cheers!
#9
Posted 07 July 2004 - 02:36 PM
Nate Dorward, on Jul 7 2004, 11:11 AM, said:
Nate - thanks for the link by PM, but yes, I got it at the third try, avoiding AMG. I don't seem to be having much joy there recently. Problems with a pop-up that prevents me doing anything else, despite Google pop-up blocking and full cookie elimination on my browser. They really are a pain, and I'm not very devious.
#10
Posted 07 July 2004 - 02:46 PM
#11
Posted 07 July 2004 - 03:38 PM
I should say, don't take my intro note seriously--it was just my way of trying to make people who felt they couldn't i.d. the musicians feel more comfortable (because in fact very few of the musicians are big names). Maybe I should edit tha paragraph out of the post.
OK, I'll keep my trap shut for now till other BFT recipients have had a chance to digest the disc. (Or receive them, in several cases: I've discovered to my chagrin that the discs sent overseas seem to have arrived faster than those to the US...)
#12
Posted 07 July 2004 - 11:27 PM
1. I was originally thinking the first track was something Dave Douglas did, but I soon realized it had no trumpet. Since b.cl. is there it seems that it might be Adam Kolker or Don Byron. It's very quirky and almost unclassifiable by genre. Kinda feels bluegrassy at times and other times it free jazz. Very interesting choice. I really think its a fair guess to say that you are the only one on this BBoard who is hip to this artist, but people always surprise me. By the way, I really dig the fiddle solo. 4 1/2 stars for interestingness and beautiful feel as a group.
2. Donna Lee. It's gotta be a pianist who is hip to free music. I don't think it could be JAMO. It MIGHT be someone with the initals KW who is often known to play with a belgian harmonica player. Could this be him? Like I said, it's somebody with straightahead chops but is hip to free playing. 4 stars for beautiful harmonic concept and completeness.
3. Soprano sax (beautiful sound by the way) and piano. It's got a bit of the quirkiness of the first track but much sparser so it's gotta be some cats who value use of space in their playing and simpler instrumentations. This could be a duet of Francois Bourrassa with his sax-mate Andre Leroux. but no clue who the violin is. 4 stars.
4. I originally thought WSQ. But that is too obvious. And the tenor player is quite obviously not David Murray. Plus they wouldn't really be doing something with a rhythm section. This might be the Toronto Jazz Chamber Septet. 2 1/2 stars for swingin it, but not really my cup o tea.
5. Haunting soprano/piano duet at the beginning. The technique is reminiscent of Mark Turner or Chris Cheek one of those New York guys with that classical sounding approach that still swings. This seems like its from that downtown clique of guys including the abovementioned and cats like Kurt Rosenwinkel and David Berkman and Mehldau. but I am probably way off base. Interesting trumpet solo. It sounds like the trumpet player is the same as the one on Don Byron's Music for Six Musicians. Can't think of his name. 3 stars.
6. Pretty. Definately New York cats. The tenor player digs Lovano and Tristano. His altissimo sounds like Josh Redman, but it's not him. The pianist totally escapes me but if I were to guess.
7. David Murray or James Carter on tenor? Crazy intervallic leaps. Definately have to pick this blues up. Great band. Nobody overplays. Great communication. 4 1/2 stars.
8. Alone Together is the tune. It's an old school cat. And the bassist is that famous musician Nate is talking about. It's either Ray Brown or George Mraz or Percy Heath but probably Ray. The pianist is someone from the hard-bop era. I love these changes. Makes me wanna pick up my horn. 4 stars.
9. The saxophonist definately has his own sound. Now whose sound that is, is beyond me. The drummer sounds like Paul Motian. Definately a lot of interplay. Could also be Billy Hart or Al Foster. The bassist is unique too. 3 stars - nice playing at times seems like it's going nowhere.
10. I f^%&in' love this shit. Pharoah? Gato Barbieri? Such hip piano. Could it be Jason Moran? He certainly meets his match here. When they finally get to something that sounds like a melody. It sounds like Blue Bossa with a bridge. Great drumming too. 5 stars.
11. The name of this tune is on the tip of my tongue. The changes at times sound like Body & Soul. But I know its not Alfie. Such hip piano here. 4 stars.
12. Yeah baby, swing that dissonance! I have to pick this up once I find out who it is. 4 1/2 stars.
13. Solar. That's all I know. 3 1/2 stars.
14. (sniffle) I almost cried it was so beautiful. Got to be one of the masters, but I've already named the one famous cat (I think). Howard Alden? There are too many good guitar players out there that I've never heard. This has to be from the 90s even though it's got that old vintage sound. 5 stars.
sorry if I burst the guessing bubble. but I had to get some of this off my chest and get the discussion going.
#13
Posted 08 July 2004 - 10:46 AM
The original is from ABBA "Super Trouper" album.
Will post more after second (third, fourth?) spin. The CD is worth it!
Andrew
This post has been edited by dutchmanx: 11 July 2004 - 10:43 PM
#15
Posted 08 July 2004 - 04:21 PM
#16
Posted 09 July 2004 - 10:47 AM
Nate Dorward, on Jul 7 2004, 01:58 AM, said:
Have fun! --N
I do have fun, but ....
Your above statement applies to yours truly: I am totally stumped by this one on first and second listen. The only artist I think I recognize is Bennie Wallace playing tenor sax on track # 7 - that's it.
Many interesting choices - I hope I can find the time to comment on the musical side of the tracks some time this weekend. Thanks a lot. I hope it's not all Canadians .....
#17
Posted 09 July 2004 - 01:04 PM
tooter, on Jul 7 2004, 03:46 PM, said:
Doh! I should have got this - I have all four of his CDs. This AMG link has the correct album title.
Here goes another artists I considered for my own BFT ... nice to see you like him!
#18
Posted 09 July 2004 - 03:57 PM
Monkisms here and there, a run at Ran ... but nah..
Cut #10 is sevenandahalf minutes of tour de force crazy-jazz education, especially at two minutes when it unchains itself into some mandingo meshugamontuno then thrill rides the rhythm section (Parker bows?) back before a Gayle force melody that's driving me crazy "for a long long time" , after which I just don't know Ware i'm going. :tup
Needs to give this more spins - 3, 8, 11 absolute beauty and 12 thoroughly knocking me out! There is a cohension here that get's completely tossed with the last cut making me think this thread tying it together is a conduction of sorts?
Can't wait to read those knowledgable posts now and come back with some thoughts later. Thanks Nate! :tup
#20
Posted 10 July 2004 - 09:25 AM
I recognised a number of the tunes, from Donna Lee to Under the Paris Sky thru Solar, Alone Together, Body And Soul and a Carla Bley tune. But none of the musicians although I'm sure some are very familiar (isn't that Konitz on track 6?).
Track 1 is a total mystery but a very interesting entrance. I'll be waiting to for the answer to pursue that album further. Same goes for track 14 (sounds familiar but my brain has no answer yet).
I'll try just one guess: track 8. I have never heard the album. Nate Darword being Canadian and that legendary pianist is based in that country. I have another of his recent albums so a wild guess is the opening track from that CD:
http://www.allmusic....l=Asyfm962ogep1
I'll give the BFT 14 further hearings (be glad to) and discuss further.
In any case, right or wrong, many thanks to Nate Dorward for assembling this.
#21
Posted 10 July 2004 - 11:35 AM
Aha, glad to see the Bley tune & "Under Paris Skies" got spotted ("U.P.S." does sorta resemble "Blue Bossa" in this version!). That leaves only one non-original unidentified on the BFT.
& as I said don't worry much about i.d.s: there are about five or six tracks I suspect will be nailed after everyone's given it a spin (there's already been one confirmed sighting!), but the others are pretty out-of-the-way. (I'm surprised no-one's spotted #11 yet, though... :) ) In any case I'm more interested in direct responses to the music.
#22
Posted 11 July 2004 - 02:02 AM
#24
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:56 AM
"HAFC" was coined by yours truly. It stands for "Haven't a Clue." ;) :g
I think the joke's worn thin by now, so I don't think I'll use 'em anymore. :) ^_^
#25
Posted 11 July 2004 - 04:57 AM
brownie, on Jul 11 2004, 11:45 AM, said:
Merci!
checking in here to state that I have had little chance to listen to this thus far, maybe this afternoon will bring some time. There are some very pretty things on the disk, some pretty nice things, and some things I could do without. Nate was not joking when he mentioned that there would be little on it that would ring many bells, some bells were struck though and I will try to draw some parallels and write up some impressions later. For now, let me translate Dan's trademarked abbreviations for brownie: HAFC means Haven't An FFing Clue, DKDC® means Don't Know, Don't Care. To be used only when the music doesn't move any one muscle in your brain at all, which is utterly rare in my case. ^_^
This post has been edited by couw: 11 July 2004 - 02:54 PM
#26
Posted 11 July 2004 - 05:15 AM
Big Al, on Jul 11 2004, 04:56 AM, said:
"HAFC" was coined by yours truly. It stands for "Haven't a Clue." ;) :g
I think the joke's worn thin by now, so I don't think I'll use 'em anymore. :) ^_^
A giant thanks, Big Al! (and you too, Couw!).
Didn't realize I had to work on my Dangouldese and Bigalese languages. Now that I know what they are and where they come from, I may try and squeeze them in some future posts of mine :D

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote