Jump to content

ep1str0phy

Members
  • Posts

    2,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Posts posted by ep1str0phy

  1. I don't have much interest in most of the Black Saint/Soul Note catalog anymore, but the ones that I think are real classics are Bill Dixon-Vade Mecum and Vade Mecum II, quartets with William Parker, Barry Guy and Tony Oxley, following up the chamber jazz legacy of the Giuffre/Bley/Swallow trio.

    I keep hearing things about the Dixons, although they aren't exactly canon (sleeper classics, I guess). Next time I see one, I'll pick it up.

  2. Just 'cause we're talking Black Saint, I'll bring up John Carter's "Dauwhe." Just got it a couple of days ago--heavy, heavy stuff (I'm sure most of you are hip to it). Carter is a legend of modern clarinet--and what beautiful compositions! Top-flight in every respect. The band is a plus.

  3. as far as blacke saint/soule note if you don't have them-the andrew cyrille lead quartet albums from the early 80s (late 70s?) are excellent. i am thinking primarily of "the navigator" "special people" and "metamusicians stomp". i do not think these cyrille albums get enough credit for being among the best small group performances of this time period.

    I own only "Metamusicians' Stomp," but it's a favorite--probably one of the best post-Ornette quartet records out there. The whole band just cooks--and it's always nice to hear Ted Daniels (one of the most underrated trumpet players in the "New Thing"). Few combos have found interesting, original things to do with the trumpet/reed/bass/drum format, but that Maono record will always be a beautiful exception.

  4. I just had to share this pull... 'cause it's probably the single best 'group' of albums I've ever purchased:

    Roscoe Mitchell/L-R-G, The Maze, S II Examples

    Gary Burton: A Genuine Tong Funeral

    Dave Brubeck: All the Things We Are

    Don Cherry: Orient

    John Carter: Dauwhe

    Johnny Dyani Quartet: Angolian Cry

    They're all new to me and they're all beautiful.

  5. It is the two bass group! I only wish someone had recorded the LA concert from a couple of years back--Ornette was a little more plangent than usual, and the version of "Lonely Woman" (with Cohen, Falanga, and Charlie Haden on bass) was just heartbreaking).

    EDIT--Sound Grammar is an Ornette Coleman label. Looks like we really are getting a new record (it's about time).

    I was sitting in about the fifth row center at Disney Hall. It was an AMAZING concert. After so many years Ornette was STILL able to THRILL 1/3 of the audience, CONFUSE another third and UPSET the remaining third. I'll bet 300 people walked out!! --including the couple next to me who I overheard say something like "just a buch of damn noise."

    I was COMPLETELY enthralled from the first note. I would LOVE to hear this band on record!!!!

    Ha! You noticed the walkouts, too? Ornette is staying relevant, he is.

  6. I don't really see the points in these "reunions" of bands that may have existed only for one album (sure, the BN guys played together in different groupings all the time, but...) - same for Mwandishi - what's the point? You can't go back in time...

    Propositions like having Rollins together with some real good musicians again for a change, make much more sense (not to diss Anderson & Scott, but hey... they're just not in his league - and Cranshaw, whom I never found the most interesting bassist anyway, has to be one of the worst electric bass players in jazz... utterly boring is a kind judgment of his contribution to Rollins' music).

    Trying to come to terms with a "real" point is sort of antithetical to a thread like this. Again, idle dreaming for consumer/aesthetic interest. If the "Conference of the Birds" group recorded a new joint tomorrow, I'd be in line to buy it (although that ensemble was never so cohesive as, say, the Coltrane quartet, these are consummate musicians we're talking about). You're right--there is no way to go back in time. I'm not sure anyone wants to--on a permanent level, anyway (I think one album/a couple of gigs is enough--which isn't, on some level, that far off from the BN-polygamy back in the day).

    And your contentions definitely hold for Mwandishi; judging from a number of Herbie's remarks, there's really nothing for that group to "say" anymore. This doesn't mean I wouldn't like to hear Hancock/Maupin/Henderson/Priester/Williams/Hart/Ndugu (etc.)... they just couldn't be "Mwandishi". Throw six or seven old friends into a room and tell me they won't have something to talk about.

    The McLean/Hutcherson/Moncur triumvirate has reunited several times over the years--with varying levels of musical "success," I imagine. There's obviously something to be said about these relationships, whether or not the music still has the "fire" or the "purpose" or the "timeliness"--these are people, friends, and artists, too... not just record grooves (eh, you get my point :) ).

  7. Recording: McLean/Moncur/Hutcherson/Ridley/Haynes

    I'd say the "Dialogue" or "Components" Hutcherson bands, but Freddie's chops are on the outs... :(

    Then again, there's always this group (from New Africa):

    Moncur/Mitchell/Burrell/Silva/Cyrille

    -One of those groups that should have had a shelf life. C'mon, guys!

    -And does anyone know if Don Ayler still has his chops?

  8. This is my favorite part:

    "Crouch likes to fight. He has punched and threatened some of those who cross him."

    My favorite part was when Sam Rivers decked the Grouch:

    (Eugene Chadbourne talking:) "I saw Stanley Crouch get decked by Sam Rivers one time, that was a great experience, Sam Rivers laid him out cold right on the stage."

    - Rick Lopez' Sam Rivers Sessionography site

    Sam is badass.

    Then again... not saying that Crouch didn't deserve it, but Sam can't be proud of (partly) going down as the man who decked SC. Sam comes across as such an intelligent, beatific presence that it startles me to think that he was driven to such extremes. There's a difference between being an asshole and being a flat-out, sociopathic instigator--the latter of which must apply to Crouch.

    Regardless of his history, it is doubly evident that Stan-the-man is and has been making a conscious effort to alienate himself from the community of his youth--and in a wild, fatuous, irrational manner. At this point, it's like Crouch is taking pre-emptive measures to ensure first blood in a cycle of continuous rejection... and it'll just keep devolving. I hate to invoke the words, but I've seen few men who so completely typify the "nigga" mentality. Whatever his contributions to scholarship, that's a damn shame.

  9. It is the two bass group! I only wish someone had recorded the LA concert from a couple of years back--Ornette was a little more plangent than usual, and the version of "Lonely Woman" (with Cohen, Falanga, and Charlie Haden on bass) was just heartbreaking).

    EDIT--Sound Grammar is an Ornette Coleman label. Looks like we really are getting a new record (it's about time).

  10. This is ironic: "Crouch is a fierce critic of gangsta rap music, primarily its promotion of violence..."

    Should I believe all these fighting stories, or not? Wikipedia is not always the most reliable source.

    Man, he's like a folk villain already. This is too much. :rofl:

  11. This is my favorite part:

    "Crouch likes to fight. He has punched and threatened some of those who cross him."

    Frankly, I don't think this guy is worth lambasting anymore. He long ago lapsed into the realm of caricature--and, seriously, most anti-Crouch comments have no recourse but dismissive vitriol. It's hard not to be polarized. How do you deal with this asshole? Let him have his tea parties with WM. Crazy-ass failed-avant-garde drummer.

  12. I'll second the enthusiasm for the BYGs. "Luna Surface" is cerebral, dense, and dripping with your patented 60's exigency--a sort of prototypal BYG session. The sound, however, is ridiculously muddy, the recording is brief, and there's very little "let-up" throughout the course of the album (although I found it refreshing after some two hours of AMM). "Seasons," I'll contend, is the masterpiece. It's been reissued on Sunspots as a limited edition 2-disc package... the sound is fine, the album is a stunner: 3 LPs worth of top-shelf blowing, gorgeous ensemble interplay, and all the room necessary for dynamic contrast, subtlety, and exploration. I believe the word is "epic." Enough people have spluged all over it, but "Seasons" is certainly worth all the acclaim.

  13. I am of course going to buy this - I love Joe. I'm just curious to know if there are any new originals. I do hope there are not vocals on every track, but even that would not keep me from getting it.

    I'm glad Dwayne Burno finally got to record with Joe - he told me a few years ago how much he loves playing with him.

    He's at the Iridium 4/6-7; I plan to be there.

    Bertrand.

    Burno's a bad cat--definitely fits the whole Blue Notish post-bop vibe. I'm looking forward to this one.

  14. How about "Wahoo" by Duke Pearson??

    Oh yeah! I bought the old CD version for quite a lot of money last year and I

    think it's a magnificent session. Should be an RVG though, not a Connoisseur.

    I'd like to hear that Grant Green session with John Gilmore.

    Whoa, whoa, whoa, what? Who else was in the group?

    Grant Green Sextet

    John Gilmore (ts) Bobby Hutcherson (vib) Duke Pearson (p) Grant Green (g) Butch Warren (b) Billy Higgins (d)

    Rudy Van Gelder Studio, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, February 12, 1964

    1299 Untitled Grant Green Tune, No. 3 Blue Note rejected

    1300 Minor League -

    1301 Grant's Tune -

    1302 Un Poco Loco -

    1303 Ezz-thetic -

    There was a discussion about this session somewhere around here but I can't find it right now.

    Quite a lineup IMO. I know people think that Gilmore + Pearson is a mismatch but

    quite frankly I think Gilmore sounds just fine on the more conservative Freddie

    Hubbard and Art Blakey sessions he participated in during the 60s.

    It's supposed to have been somewhat of a trainwreck but we all know how some old

    evaluations of unreleased sessions have proven to be off the mark - Bobby Hutcherson's

    The Kicker had been called an "unsuccessful session" in some liner notes, but when

    it finally came out in 2003 (!!) Cuscuna had to admit that it sounded pretty good after all.

    Either way I'd just like to hear it. After all they recorded five tunes. I'd say if it really

    had been that bad they would've aborted the session earlier than that.

    Hey, thanks for that. Sounds like a run-thru for "Solid"--although it would have been interesting to hear these charts without the Coltrane rhythm section and the Spaulding/Henderson propulsion. Another one to lust after, I guess.

  15. I'm not sayin' Kurt was a genius like a jazz great was. That would be stupid because those two camps are comin' at the world from totally different angles. Jazz is life-affirming, life-prolonging, life-enhancing, life-appreciating.

    But rock like Nirvana is speaking of the reality under the surface of courageous positive thinking. Positive thinking is the only way if you're going to make it long term, but positive thinking as presented by the media is also one of the biggest lies in our society. Negative thinking is also an serious lie manipulated for profit by untold legions.

    Kurt told the truth in a way that sliced right through it all and probably de-confused hundreds of thousands who otherwise would have never got out of their own world of negativity. He almost singlehandedly destroyed two popular music genres (hair metal and pre-HIV party music). To date, 50 million legit recordings have been sold. Probably more musicians from every diverse genre, style, age, location, whatever, recognize Nirvana as having laid down some of the most real music in history. Mass emphathetic communication directly to the scariest part of the human soul is definitely one kind of musical genius.

    Not arguing with you here--in fact, I agree with you. Again, it's easy to acknowledge Kurt's iconic status, influence, personal virtues, etc. And I'm glad that you're making the distinction between the sort of "genius" invoked to described jazz greats and that specific to Nirvana. My bone of contention is only that the term "genius" is utilized so haphazardly that it's difficult to keep track of intentions--and, moreover, ridiculously easy to misinterpret (hence all the furor over the Cobain as genius thing). So am I correct in thinking that the "realness" of Kurt's message--or, more specifically, his (emphatic) "communicative ability"--is what makes him a genius? What sort of definition are we using here (again, no vitriol here--I'm just trying to understand this)?

  16. We all have our own heros. I like Kurt Cobain's music and thought it was vastly different and revolutionary at the time. Is he a rock icon? Certainly. Probably the last true one we've seen in a long time. However, I find the post-mortem "genius" tag taking on gigantic proportions. His untimely death, suicide, tragic life are just that...tragic. But going on and on and on about it....rent "Last Days" and if you haven't had your fill of tragic early 90's Seattle, druggie, downer death trip by the end of it you're a better man than I.

    Genius is a word we overuse imho these days. Cobain was was/is a legend. A genius? I don't know. Maybe, but let's think on it a bit before the proclaimation for once.

    I was sort of waiting for this (above)--the rational response to obviously inflammatory statements (that "who is musical genius" thing is thermite--thanks for getting it out of the way, 7/4 ;) ). Cobain's genius is certainly contentious. I don't think that's the only issue involved in the fatuous (really not pointing fingers), confusing overuse of the "genius" nomenclature. It's just that the rationale for labeling is seldom explicit. Cobain's struggles with mental incapacitation, the bullshit millieu of showbiz, and especially his desire to create in spite of circumstances go some way toward explaining why he was an icon among a generation of troubled youth, courageous, fascinating, etc. But none of this--none of it--contributes to a fuller understanding of the man's genius (if it even exists). I'm bothered by the fact that this sort of information is regularly invoked toward validating the "genius" of our musical iconology when--in all seriousness--we often deny (or, more precisely, "gloss over") more concrete (specifically aesthetic) qualities. In other words: biography does not = genius. And--I know this is a tangent--but take it back to the Miles Davis discussion from a week or so ago--there is legitimate virtue in questioning the relevance of sociological/biographical factors to the whole "genius" labeling process. Let's temper the thoughts a bit, folks.

  17. As long as we're name-dropping: Billy Bang. The guy never fails to get a rise outta me (and such passion!).

    And CT--good call on Samson. I dug the Paris Transatlantic piece on the Slug's sides--they're still some of my favorite music. I was in early High School when I heard Volume 1--my first Ayler. It was the dead of winter... I was on a break, listening to the sonic vestiges of the revolution--heated the place (and my soul) right up.

    End tangent--like others, I'm ambivalent on Carter. Unaffected, but open to more.

×
×
  • Create New...