Fourty years ago, when I began listening to jazz, the music was embroiled in controversy. Such figures as Archie Shepp, Sun Ra, Eric Dolphy, Ornette Coleman, Cecil Taylor, and John Coltrane were accused by establishment critics of being at best misguided and at worst charlatans and hustlers.
Now some of the hostility toward these musicians was simply racism. That's undeniable. But some of it wasn't. Accessability was and is a problem with many or all of the aforementioned.
Yet today each one of these musicians is firmly ensconced in the pantheon of jazz greats, with a very vocal cadre of champions eager to convert others to their cause and fill holes in their collection of the Great Man's Works
So what gives? Does every jazz musician eventually find an audience, even if it's as "the most under-rated jazz musician of all time"? Or are there extremist musicians whose vision was so personal and so peculiar that they never developed a critical mass of adherents? If so, who are they?
And have there been fakers in jazz so transparent in their knavery that they were left by the roadside as jazz history rolled on?