The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Patty, You've got to believe me when I say that I am just trying to LIBERATE you--from DEEP, who attracts you like the flame to your moth; from your COY act, during which you pretend to "educate" us voyeurs in the history of masturbatory devices while denying ever having employed same; and from your pseudo-sophisticated take on politics, art, life, etc. You ARE fourteen years old, sucking on a popsicle because you're afraid to suck on the REAL THING. Cyberspace is your 21st century version of "the vapors." You've got potential, kid--give us something to really curl our mukluks! ...And (not to disappoint) a word on behalf of THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD: IF The Emperor has no clothes, ALL THE BETTER TO SEE HIS BALLS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 HEY! Deepisaloser lurker! Lurk in plain sight--Let's see YOUR BALLS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) Patty, You've got to believe me when I say that I am just trying to LIBERATE you--from DEEP, who attracts you like the flame to your moth; from your COY act, during which you pretend to "educate" us voyeurs in the history of masturbatory devices while denying ever having employed same; and from your pseudo-sophisticated take on politics, art, life, etc. You ARE fourteen years old, sucking on a popsicle because you're afraid to suck on the REAL THING. Cyberspace is your 21st century version of "the vapors." You've got potential, kid--give us something to really curl our mukluks! ...And (not to disappoint) a word on behalf of THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD: IF The Emperor has no clothes, ALL THE BETTER TO SEE HIS BALLS! Coyness is a word which belongs in the same category as women suffering from the vapours. So Victorian. My natural reserve is neither. I don't need to be liberated. I'm not owned, now will I ever be, as I said earlier. Don't be ridiculous!!! Where did you get the idea that I should entertain YOU?? I'm not a trained seal. I am certainly not attempting to educate you, but was merely reacting to the direction the discussion had taken. Whatever you want to make of my posts is beyond my control. BTW, I was unaware that you were the official spokesperson for the LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD. An unhampered view of the Emperor may not show what you think it would. In fact perhaps it may very well reveal what many already suspect. It may reveal yet another form of vacuousness. The man is an empty suit, but that's merely my opinion. As for seeing his balls, I think not. What we would more likely see is his strings. Pseudo-sophistocated?? Never my intent. Read. Don't read. Whatever you like. I will not be goaded into titillating you, so if that's why you're here, BACK OFF!!!! As I said, I post what I want to share. If you don't find it interesting, why don't you post something better and more interesting Next................. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) Aw shucks, Patty--I thought I WAS being interesting--perceptive and entertaining even. Obviously I've hit a nerve. I tell you what--let's take a poll. All other posters vote yea or nay on the question: Were Patty's posts on masturbatory devices HOT, and does she seem to have a strange attraction to DEEP's repulsive vulgarities? I am totally disinterested--in hibernation reconfirmed--in no way possessive (that was DEEP) All I care about is TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE CANADIAN WAY! Edited February 7, 2004 by The Groper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) Aw shucks, Patty--I thought WAS being interesting--perceptive and entertaining even. Obviously I've hit a nerve. I tell you what--let's take a poll. All other posters vote yea or nay on the question: Were Patty's posts on masturbatory devices HOT, and does she seem to have a strange attraction to DEEP's repulsive vulgarities? I am totally disinterested--in hibernation reconfirmed--in no way possessive (that was DEEP) All I care about is TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE CANADIAN WAY! I look past the vulgarities of our thread originator's comments, to what he is actually saying, much the same way as I would in any conversation and react to that. He posts the way he does, and I post the way I do. I did not use the term "masturbatory device". You did. I was reacting to a small technicality, brought to light regarding whether "personal massagers" were cordless, and so, could not have caused the power outage along the Eastern Seaboard. The suggestion that I could have caused that major inconvenience, by the over-use of my personal massage appliance was made and the explanation was in defence of my innocence of such a dastardly deed. You're interested in TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE CANADIAN WAY??? Right. And pigs have wings. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 In the words of that great humanitarian, Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" (AND SEE PATTY NAKED??) {Parenthesis my add}. After all, if Janet Jackson can show titty during a superbowl halftime show, Patty should have no compunction in displaying a still photo of some DOOKY at ORGANissimo should she?? I see God Awful Squawk (Goodspeak) has joined the party. I suppose we can expect Disco and the rest of the WOD (Webmistress of Death) Wretches to follow in his wake any time now. OH GOODY, GARY DISCO AND BLATHERSKITE, AND THE WIDOW BISHOP...WHAT A HAPPY REUNION OF *LOSERS* !! DEEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) In the words of that great humanitarian, Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" (AND SEE PATTY NAKED??) {Parenthesis my add}. After all, if Janet Jackson can show titty during a superbowl halftime show, Patty should have no compunction in displaying a still photo of some DOOKY at ORGANissimo should she?? Don't hold your breath. Better yet, why don't you and the fourteen-year-old "pseudo-sophistocate" *GROPER* post recent naked still pictures of YOURselves?? Don't be ridiculous! What is this, seventh grade??? As you said, quoting the great humanitarian, Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" I didn't come here to argue. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) Don't be ridiculous! What is this, seventh grade??? Patty (pooper), You can bet your ass (the one you WISH you had) that more than a few "seventh grade" kids slept with Madame LePALM the night of the superbowl. If you won't post any DOOKEY shots will you at least BLOW US--------------->------ -------------->----------------------->---------------------------------------------->--- ----------------------->--------------------------------->-------------------------------- ---------------------------->------------------------------------>------------------- ----------------------------------------->-------------------------------->---------- ---------------------------->------------------------------->----------------------- ----------------------------------------->--------------------------------------------- -------------------->------------------------------------------>---------------------- ------------------- A KISS ???? DEEP Edited February 7, 2004 by DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) You and "GROPER" should just join hands and take a long walk, together, off a short pier. A couple of Franklin Stove replicates, toddling into the sunset. I, for one, would pay a dollar to see that. As for blowing you both..........................a kiss, I've been doing that all along, but both of you insist on misinterpreting my intent. Nothing I can do about that. LIFE IS WAY TOO SHORT TO BE MEAN FOR FUN. I don't want the last thing I say to someone, before they're gunned down in the street to be something I didn't intend to say. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) Patricia: Now we're getting close to the bone, so to speak. You go on at length about "personal massagers" and then get indignant that I call them "masturbatory devices." Now THERE'S a distinction without a difference. You claim to be blowing misconstrued kisses. You reject a call for a nude photo of yourself as being "seventh-grade," but dare DEEP and myself to post same. Now I don't care for crass photos that leave nothing to the imagination, but I've pointed out (accurately, I think) that you have a certain knack for SOFT-CORE PORN. In that context, you and DEEP are engaged in a SOFT/HARD TANGO. DANCE, LITTLE COQUETTE, DANCE! Your next stop could be TRUE sophistication. "Gunned down in the street?" Where the hell did that come from? Must be that vast left field known as CANADA. And is it MEANNESS you object to or MEANING? Edited February 7, 2004 by The Groper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 I guess that after 1240 posts our boy CHRISTIERN has no intention of UNCLENCHING *HIS* KEESTER. B-3, How 'bout changing the thread title to: PATTY, Time to unclench your keester. I can see her pursed lips glaring at the screen, but in Patty's case, I believe there is still some hope. DEEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) DEEP: I think any rational, objective adult can see that PATTY has an innate natural FLOW with which she should GO. She just needs encouragement to GRASP THE OLIVE BRANCH. I see now that your gift to her is of a therapeutic nature. Pity that poor Christiern can't see the wisdom in REACHING OUT. You are truly a misunderstood humanitarian. Edited February 7, 2004 by The Groper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 The Groper, I think it would most likely take THE JAWS OF LIFE to unclench Christiern's or Patty's keester. I can't help but wonder how long it's been since either of them has done "THE NASTY" with....A PARTNER!! DEEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) The Groper, I think it would most likely take THE JAWS OF LIFE to unclench Christiern's or Patty's keester. I can't help but wonder how long it's been since either of them has done "THE NASTY" with....A PARTNER!! DEEP Yeah. Right. You and "GROPER" know me so well. Oh, and GROPER, the comment you wondered about simply referred to my lifelong fear of saying something hurtful to someone and never having the opportunity to take it back, due to their unexpected death. I simply was making reference to the unpredictability of life and that I'm always mindful of how fragile we all are [with the exception of the two of you, apparently]. Clearer now??? Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 What's it gonna be, Patty--TOUGH GUY or DELICATE BLOSSOM? You remind me of that classic COQUETTE (reputed woman of easy virtue), BLANCHE DUBOIS: "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers." Get back to your disingenuous SPINDOCTORING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) What's it gonna be, Patty--TOUGH GUY or DELICATE BLOSSOM? You remind me of that classic COQUETTE (reputed woman of easy virtue), BLANCHE DUBOIS: "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers."Â Get back to your disingenuous SPINDOCTORING! Thank you for the helpful explanation. Those unfamiliar with Tennessee Williams' fictional character who, frankly annoyed me, I'm sure are most grateful. Williams' female characters, much like Somerset Maugham's female characters, were viewed through the lens of gay men, as both these authors were. The women were characatures. Also, the definition of "coquette" was most helpful. I would never have known what that meant, had you not explained. TOUGH GUY or DELICATE BLOSSOM?? I laugh on the front of your ugly plaid shirt, you PHILISTINE!!! I'm both, as most women I know are. I have learned, quite recently, actually, NEVER to depend on the kindness of not only strangers, but even more so, those who pretend to be friends. Real women, and I like to think I am one of those, are not one-dimensional people, any more than real men are. As for my political opinions, they are my opinions, just as your political opinions are yours. I am never disingenuos, though sometimes I am making an observation that may differ from those who choose to lock-step behind a smirking simpleton, as you have chosen to do. But, it's a free country. At least it used to be. If ever anyone had no idea who I am, or what I'm like, it's you. So, as I suggested earlier, BACK OFF. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Groper Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) THAT'S more like it, Patty--I love when the claws come out. I especially liked the (gay) Tennessee Williams innuendo. But how could you have possibly known I favor ugly plaid shirts? Is that the telltale sign of PHILISTINISM? Then I plead GUILTY AS CHARGED! Whip me, beat me, chain me, but RESPECT ME! Just don't try to deny your own prurient interest in this thread--THAT'S what I mean by disingenuous. In Lock-Step Behind a Smirking Simpleton But With Happy Feet While Suffering Hillary-Pillory, The Groper Edited February 7, 2004 by The Groper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) THAT'S more like it, Patty--I love when the claws come out. I especially liked the (gay) Tennessee Williams innuendo. But how could you have possibly known I favor ugly plaid shirts? Is that the telltale sign of PHILISTINISM? Then I plead GUILTY AS CHARGED! Whip me, beat me, chain me, but RESPECT ME! Just don't try to deny your own prurient interest in this thread--THAT'S what I mean by disingenuous. In Lock-Step Behind a Smirking Simpleton But With Happy Feet While Suffering Hillary-Pillory, The Groper That Williams was gay, was not innuendo, but fact, as was the fact that Maugham was gay, as was his nephew,author, Robin Maugham, none of which were slams against gay people in general. I mention it only because of these authors' eerily similar characterizations of women in all their novels. I have no claws. Just an iron fist in a velvet glove. As for my guess about your sartorial sense, I have no idea whether you actually have any, but I can imagine a sofa-sized, mass-produced landscape over the ugly plaid sofa and your television on a wire stand, complementing your recliner chair, directly across from it. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DEEP (GET ME OUT OF MY SKULL) Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 The Groper and Patty, Don't you think it's time for phone (or foam) sex....or maybe it's... ...MOTEL TIME!!! DEEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 The Groper and Patty, Don't you think it's time for phone (or foam) sex....or maybe it's... ...<span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'>MOTEL TIME!!!</span> DEEP What on earth are you talking about??? Hell will freeze over first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connoisseur series500 Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 That Williams was gay, was not innuendo, but fact, as was the fact that Maugham was gay, as was his nephew,author, Robin Maugham, none of which were slams against gay people in general. I mention it only because of these authors' eerily similar characterizations of women in all their novels. So you feel that there's a similarity in the way these authors portray women and it's likely because they were homosexual? Hmm, interesting theory. Maybe they were very accurate observors as are many authors. I guess I just never considered that angle before, Patty. BTW, if I could offer some friendly advice: Choose GROPE! B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 (edited) That Williams was gay, was not innuendo, but fact, as was the fact that Maugham was gay, as was his nephew,author, Robin Maugham, none of which were slams against gay people in general. I mention it only because of these authors' eerily similar characterizations of women in all their novels. So you feel that there's a similarity in the way these authors portray women and it's likely because they were homosexual? Hmm, interesting theory. Maybe they were very accurate observors as are many authors. I guess I just never considered that angle before, Patty. BTW, if I could offer some friendly advice: Choose GROPE! B) Just stop the match-making, or I'll laugh on the front of your shirt too. Yes, I do feel that the authors I mentioned's characterization of women is unique to them, because of the authors being gay. It's not a criticism. They were also, as you say, accurate observors of human nature, but in a peculiar way, IMO. Both Maughams as well as Williams, to a lesser degree are favourite authors. Read them again, any one of them and see if you can see what I do. However, the last thing I want is somebody who explains literary references to me as if I were a child. Introducing me to favourite books is one thing. Treating me as though I were illiterate is another. Nothing which has been said on this thread, so far, no matter how purile, is more insulting than that. Edited February 7, 2004 by patricia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connoisseur series500 Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 However, the last thing I want is somebody who explains literary references to me as if I were a child. Introducing me to favourite books is one thing. Treating me as if I were illiterate is another. Nothing which has been said on this thread, so far, no matter how purile, is more insulting than that. Referring to...? Did I do....? Must have missed something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connoisseur series500 Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Just stop the match-making, or I'll laugh on the front of your shirt too. Matchmaking is one thing, Patty; doing my utmost to prevent you from falling into the soiled and twisted clutches of DEEP is another. Don't be fooled by GROPE's plaid shirts and all his talk of sexual quiescence. I bet he's a real tiger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricia Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 However, the last thing I want is somebody who explains literary references to me as if I were a child. Introducing me to favourite books is one thing. Treating me as if I were illiterate is another. Nothing which has been said on this thread, so far, no matter how purile, is more insulting than that. Referring to...? Did I do....? Must have missed something. No. No. A thousand times, no. I was still fuming from the previous post. Not you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts