Jump to content

Dan Gould

Members
  • Posts

    22,230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dan Gould

  1. I was interested last year, and I'd still be interested this year. I agree that buying someone a duplicate of something they already own is a risk. Here's an interesting idea: We have to buy the person something that ISN'T a CD and has nothing to do with jazz.

    Well that just opens an even bigger risk of not giving something that's desired! So .... as long as people send receipts ... maybe.

  2. Sounds like fun -- but a lor of work for the organizer. Couldn't it be handled by another volunteer?

    Jim's got baby's first Christmas and all...

    That's true, Maren. Someone else could certainly do it instead of Jim.

    *********************

    As far as gifts/dollar guidelines, I think $15 or $20 is the max. If you get someone's name and get an idea of their tastes from their posts, great. But I don't think necessarily that passing around gift certificates is so bad, when you consider the number of hard core collectors there are here, it may not be at all easy to find something the person doesn't have or hasn't heard.

    So, yeah, it may be passing around $15 ... but isn't it the thought that counts?

  3. so last night my wife and i were driving home from orlando (with the kids asleep in the back of the van) and i said, let's listen to bft#19!

    Don't you find it more effective to listen when you have a chance to write notes down?

    :tup for the Mrs. though.

    I'm the king of the misses, myself.

    :g

  4. We talked last year, rather late in the season, about trying to do a "Secret Santa" gift exchange last year but it never came together.

    So, since its a week into November, maybe its time to put it back out there and see what we can do. Here's the way I would set this up:

    1. People sign up on a Secret Santa thread.

    2. Jim Alfredson (B3-er) gets to be the organizer. When you sign up, send Jim a PM with your particulars-mailing address and regular email.

    3. At some point, maybe no later than December 15, Jim matches up the people who have signed up so that A is Santa to B who is Santa to C, etc. and sends out the personal info he has received. I imagine the most popular gifts will be gift certificates at Amazon or the Bastards or somewhere like that, though its possible you'll actually want to buy something for someone and ship it.

    Normally I hate dealing with the holiday season this early, but with Thanksgiving not much more than two weeks away, I guess its time ...

    What do y'all think?

    BTW, 2004 World Champion Boston Red Sox t-shirts can be ordered in XL. :g

  5. Well, I'll bet I am one of the worst offenders when it comes to cruising through the big "O" while officially "on the clock." I'd say I do it a dozen or more times a day. If I'm feeling particularly enthusiastic and motivated about work, I will accomplish a task before going back to check the "new posts" page. Of course, sometimes that one task is checking email and writing a two sentence response. :g

    What I miss is the alignment of my previous office. I was against the wall so any visitors would be seen long before they'd see what was on my monitor.

    Now, unfortunately, I am in a high traffic area with the desk against the wall, and the boss is in the office on the other side of the wall. At one point she saw me cruising through CNN or checking hotmail and made a comment about proper use of company time ... I cut back a bit but it didn't last long. What's funny is how often she sticks her head around the door to say something to me, and like an epileptic fit, my mouse shoots toward the upper right corner of the mousepad to close the window or at least minimize it. Seems so obvious to me but she hasn't said anything in a while.

    Not having sufficient cash flow for full salaries might have something to do with her reticence though. :alien:

  6. Three or four years ago, much more TV than now. At one time I watched a number of sitcoms regularly but slowly let shows like Friends and Frasier slip away.

    Lately, I've spent more time on the PC while my wife is watching a movie or Sci-Fi or something like that. Now that I think about it, that coincides with my marriage, when suddenly I had a PC in the house when my wife moved in. So, I started doing things on the PC and got away from TV.

    Currently, my regular watching can be summed up as:

    Newshour

    Seinfeld

    Occasional College or Pro Football

    Who's Line is it Anyway?

  7. Gene Harris:

    Listen Here!

    Its the Real Soul

    Soul Symphony

    Funky Genes

    at Ste Chappelle Winery

    Down Home Blues

    Standards

    of the The Three Sonds

    Georgia on My Mind

    Live at the Lighthouse

    And the Phillip Morris All-Stars

    Black Orchid

    LD with the Three Sounds

    Out of this World

    Babe's Blues

    Feelin' Good

    Hey There

    It Just Got To Be

    Vibrations

    Live at Jorgie's

    Coldwater Flat

    Live at the It Club Volume 1 and 2

    Live atht he 1990 Concord Jazz Festival First Set

    Introducing the Three Sounds

    Bottom's Up

    At Maybeck

    Best of the Three Sounds

    Gene Harris and Friends at the Bern Jazz Fest (private recording)

    25th Concord Jazz Festival

    Nature's Way (Jam Records, not the BN album by the same name)

    In His hands

    Black and blue

    Like a Lover

    Brotherhood

    Live at Otter Crest

    Alley Cats

    Fujitsu-Concord 26th Jazz Festival

    Good Deal

    At ast

    The Three Sounds (Verve)

    Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

    Bg Band Soul

    Play Jazz on Broadway

    Tribute to Count Basie

    Live at the Living Room

    Today's Sounds

    Some Like it Modern

    20th Concord Festival All-Stars

    25th Concord Festival

    Trio + One

  8. On Michel Sardaby:  if anyone can find it, I heartily recommend Straight On which is a live date with Ralph Moore and Louis Smith in the front line, all Sardaby compositions which sound remarkably like a mid-60s BN.

    Dan, what label is this on?

    Sound Hills, a '93 release. Probably tough to find at this point, but a search on GEMM shows a UK seller with one in stock, only $10.00:

    http://www.gemm.com/ddc/search.pl?&a_refno=GML669178714

    I strongly recommend jumping on this!!!!

  9. My opinion mirrors that of Big Al - most of these tunes did not engage me very long, I'm sorry to say.

    I recognized the melody of track 1 but didn't bother an in depth AMG search. Seeing the ID surprises me just a bit, I guess.

    Track 4 - for the life of me I cannot imagine why anyone would find this appealing.

    7) and 8) I liked best, but no guesses came to mind.

    Thanks for the disc, Dmitry. I just wish I'd found more to dig on it.

  10. Jim's comments serve as a reminder of a couple of follow-ups I had.

    On the Mel Rhyne composition from the Brian Lynch Criss Cross CD: ARRRGGHH!!! Not sure if I mentioned it in the discussion but I definitely recognized the tune when I heard it, but there was no way I was going to track it down.

    On Michel Sardaby: if anyone can find it, I heartily recommend Straight On which is a live date with Ralph Moore and Louis Smith in the front line, all Sardaby compositions which sound remarkably like a mid-60s BN. I've seen the Bastards pitching Sardaby trio or solo CDs but have never pulled the trigger. Based on this performance of Lush Life, I might have to correct that!

    On the Karl Denson - eggs on my face, cause I do have this one. :ph34r:

  11. I've been thinking about another way that we might be able to share and discuss favorite music with each other. Its inspired by a recent addition to Cadence magazine's regular columns, "Flying Blind."

    In Cadence, it goes like this:

    Reviewer gets copy of CD but no information on the band, the recording, etc.

    Reviewer writes his usual review, including guesses about the musicians.

    Here's my thought of how this could go:

    1. Participants sign up for their opportunity to share favorite albums.

    2. Burns are distributed to participants.

    3. Participants post their observations of the album in question.

    4. The answers are revealed.

    Here's the most important part:

    5. Participants who enjoy the CD are honor bound to purchase a legitimate copy. Participants who do not enjoy the CD are honor bound to destroy their copies.

    So, the whole idea here is not to pick OOP or super expensive Japanese pressings. Participants should choose in print recordings which are easily found at retail or internet outlets. In fact, participants might want to give general descriptions of what they want to offer, so if someone's interests don't include "modern mainstream" or "free improv" they can safely skip an offering.

    I realize the obvious risk here: We're announcing our intention to distribute copyrighted material. But I also think that #5 above does a lot to minimize that, if people are truly committed to following the rules (and considering how many people do say that when legit reissues come out, they purchase them, I think we're a fairly honest and ethical bunch). In fact, this idea actually leverages the cheap technology and the reach of the internet to create sales of music which might not otherwise exist-something that the music industry has tried to deny but ought to actually be thankful for.

    The other potential drawback of course is the possibility that people who already find themselves hard pressed to keep up with the BFT won't want to add something new to their listening pile.

    So what do you all think?

  12. If you really want the opinion of board members, why not ask, instead of putting up some silly poll in which each option reflects your opinion of certain guilt? Just curious...

    :wacko:

    Sorry Mark, but its impossible to hold all four of those opinions simultaneously. The only option I failed to account for was not guilty on second degree murder. But I figured anyone believing that can go for #2 anyway.

    And speaking of which, no one yet believes he's innocent, a handful think the state has not met its burden of proof.

  13. Look, Court TV has covered it exhaustively, and why not? Its there purpose. Otherwise, CNN.com has posted an article on each day's doings, and that's about the extent of the media coverage from where I stand.

    And considering the facts of the case and the fact that the case is entirely circumstantial, it seems to me the people on the jury have an extremely difficult challenge, one that few juries ever get.

    On that basis alone, getting the opinions of board members seems like a reasonable thing to do.

    And like they say, not interested, then don't open the thread.

×
×
  • Create New...