Your words of the day:
Offensive/Inoffensive.
That's the best way I can describe a Felser compilation. Listening to his BFTs over many years now, for me it reinforces the "music of my youth" cliche and today I was wondering, if I were his age, and he mine, would we have the same radical differences of opinion, only from a different angle of opposition? It has to be recognized that the jazz I like was not in any way the music of my youth, but I did come to the music when neobop was in its ascendancy, and my earliest listening was a mixture of classic swing and bop/hard bop.
Something I pondered while swinging between degrees of offense. On to the specifics:
TRACK ONE:
I think you had to be there. Is there a jazz connection here aside from the sort of scat the vocalist briefly attempts? Inoffensive: **.
TRACK TWO:
Sunrise, Sunset? After two minutes I want to say NEXT but I did persevere (work emails helped distract). Is that Elvin? Piano is better ... I think because it is much harder to make ugly sounds on the piano (if you stick to, you know, the keys). Offensive: Zero stars.
TRACK THREE:
Not my style of piano. Inoffensive: ** 1/2
TRACK FOUR:
Really had to be there. What the hell is he singing about? Offensive: *
TRACK FIVE:
No notes taken, so ... Inoffensive: **
TRACK SIX:
See #4, but final evaluation is Inoffensive: **
TRACK SEVEN:
Oh hell no. Offensive: Zero stars.
TRACK EIGHT:
Following up one of the worst with the track for me? Is this a Cedar tune? Hutch? I don't think its his regular partner Mr. Land on tenor.
Neither offensive nor inoffensive - *** 1/2 (1/2 star removed for the congas which rarely thrill me that much)
TRACK NINE:
When the band came in .... I went out. Offensive: Zero stars.
TRACK TEN:
Wait a sec this is obviously the Dan selection. Doesn't thrill me the way Gene would. ***
TRACK ELEVEN:
More vocals I have a hard time understanding ... Inoffensive: **
Thanks Mr. Felser and remember, if you were offended by offensive/inoffensive, you always get the last word since my BFT follows yours.