Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've just finished reading Eric Hobsbawm's "The age of capital 1848-1875". In the chapter on the arts, I found this (to me, extraordinary) statement:

"Nothing is more surprising to mid-twentieth-century generations, educated in a very different critical dogma, than the mid-nineteenth-century belief that in the arts form was unimportant, content paramount."

I really must be out of step, because I've always thought that content was paramount. And I've always thought that this was Hobsbawm's view of jazz.

Discuss :)

MG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...