The Magnificent Goldberg Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 I've just finished reading Eric Hobsbawm's "The age of capital 1848-1875". In the chapter on the arts, I found this (to me, extraordinary) statement: "Nothing is more surprising to mid-twentieth-century generations, educated in a very different critical dogma, than the mid-nineteenth-century belief that in the arts form was unimportant, content paramount." I really must be out of step, because I've always thought that content was paramount. And I've always thought that this was Hobsbawm's view of jazz. Discuss MG Quote
Guy Berger Posted February 22, 2007 Report Posted February 22, 2007 I assume this is the clash between neoclassicism (mid 20th century) and romanticism (19th century). Guy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.