alocispepraluger102 Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 (edited) http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story_pf...67&ac=PHnws Edited October 30, 2007 by alocispepraluger102 Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 Too complicated. Burn 'em and sprinkle 'em in the yard. Quote
MoGrubb Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted October 30, 2007 Author Report Posted October 30, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. i would hope there is a more practical method than commonly used today. mandatory cremation possibly? Quote
catesta Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. i would hope there is a more practical method than commonly used today. mandatory cremation possibly? Cremation is not good for the environment. Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted October 31, 2007 Author Report Posted October 31, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. i would hope there is a more practical method than commonly used today. mandatory cremation possibly? Cremation is not good for the environment. because of the smoke ingredients? Quote
MoGrubb Posted October 31, 2007 Report Posted October 31, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. i would hope there is a more practical method than commonly used today. mandatory cremation possibly? Cremation is not good for the environment. because of the smoke ingredients? I'd imagine it depends on who's getting cremated. If it's a donald trump there's a polution factor, if, say a ralph nader, not so much. Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted October 31, 2007 Author Report Posted October 31, 2007 I imagine the gov has something to say about green funerals; e.g. the water table might be fairly close to the surface, or porous soil, risks water contamination. i would hope there is a more practical method than commonly used today. mandatory cremation possibly? Cremation is not good for the environment. because of the smoke ingredients? I'd imagine it depends on who's getting cremated. If it's a donald trump there's a polution factor, if, say a ralph nader, not so much. very good! Quote
7/4 Posted November 1, 2007 Report Posted November 1, 2007 Cremation is not good for the environment. Are we toxic storage sites for all the chemicals and heavy metals? Quote
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.