Jazzmoose Posted February 22, 2008 Report Posted February 22, 2008 interesting to see that there is more sympathy on this board for a guy who kills animals to have sex with them than for a wynton marsalis fan... I don't have sympathy for him. He's out of his mind. I agree. And that goes for the guy who screwed the dead deer as well. Quote
Tom Storer Posted February 22, 2008 Report Posted February 22, 2008 (edited) Yeah, but he pleaded no contest. "A plea of guilty or no contest waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses." Personally, given that he had already been convicted of killing a horse in order to have sex with it, I wonder if he really happened across a dead deer in a ditch or in fact went sprinting and leaping through the forest after it before finally bringing it down and killing it with his bare hands, and then had sex with it. Yet the law says that if the deer is in season and if he is appropriately licensed, this man CAN kill the deer. The law doesn't specifiy good or bad reasons for killing the deer. It doesn't say, "you can hunt deer for food or for sport, but not for sex." So that's what we have to determine: Did the man in fact kill the deer? Was it hunting season? Did the man have a license? But if he did kill the deer, then he lied to the police when he said he found the deer corpse in a ditch. Looks to me like this is a shady character no matter what the facts turn out to be. I would be interested to hear the candidates' reaction to this. Edited February 22, 2008 by Tom Storer Quote
ejp626 Posted February 22, 2008 Author Report Posted February 22, 2008 I would be interested to hear the candidates' reaction to this. Sadly this didn't break until the Wisconsin primary was over. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.