alocispepraluger102 Posted May 13, 2008 Report Posted May 13, 2008 (edited) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rossignol Entertainment Newsletter SAVE CHICAGO CULTURE MAY 2008 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Greetings! This information was forwarded to me and I would like to forward it to you. Please take action to protect the music and entertainment scene that so many of us depend on for our livelihood! Please take action NOW!!! Thank you!! SAVE CHICAGO CULTURE Dear Friends, Please take a moment to read the info below. The City of Chicago is trying to pass an ordinance that will greatly affect EVERYONE who works in the bar, nightclub and entertainment industry, would put many people completely out of business, and ruin the live music and entertainment scene in Chicago ! Unless enough signatures are collected to protest this by this Wed. 5/14, (in just two days) it will be passed. Please take a moment to sign the petition, all you have to do is go to the website and post a comment. Every voice counts now. Thank you for your support, Melissa Brown PLEASE - take the time to read this...and to pass it on to everyone and anyone you know who may be affected by this (which, in Chicago , is ANYONE who enjoys live music and entertainment!) Sign the petition at: (PLEASE CUT & PASTE INTO YOUR BROWSER THE LINK BELOW) http://savechicagoculture.org/ ***JUST GO TO THE LINK ABOVE, AND POST A COMMENT, IT CAN BE BRIEF. To view the entire ordinance, go to Jim DeRogatis's blog on the Sun Times website +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Stop the promoter's ordinance! Imagine a Chicago with no Metro or Double Door or Schuba's. Imagine a Chicago with no Royal George or Bailiwick or Athenaeum. Imagine a Chicago where local music is only heard in the suburbs and theater is limited to Wicked and Jersey Boys. Scary thoughts. But if the City of Chicago 's City Council doesn't hear your voice by Wednesday, May 14, they'll become reality. On that date the council will vote to approve an ordinance that has the power to stifle creativity in Chicago 's musical, theatrical, and general cultural scenes. With no public discourse or commentary, this proposal has been approved by the City Council Committee and is on the fast track to be pushed into law. It is up to us to let our elected officials know that Chicago 's creative scene is too rich, too varied, and too vital to be regulated in such a blanket fashion. The details: The "Event Promoters" ordinance requires any event promoter to have a license from the city of Chicago and liability insurance of $300,000, but that's just the start: -The definition of "event promoter" is so loosely defined it could apply to a band that books its own shows or a theater company that's in town for a one-week run. -"Event Promoter" must be licensed and will pay $500 - $2000 depending on expected audience size. -To get the license, applicant must be over 21, get fingerprinted, submit to a background check, and jump over several other hurdles. -This ordinance seems targeted towards smaller venues, since those with 500+ permanent seats are exempt. -Police must be notified at least 7 days in advance of event. -For the complete ordinance, check out Jim DeRogatis' blog on the Chicago Sun-Times. We are collecting signatures to present to the council voicing our opposition to this ordinance. YOUR VOICE IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CHICAGO 'S CULTURAL SCENE CONTINUES TO THRIVE. Please leave a comment as your expression of disapproval. These will be presented to the City Council and to all Chicago Aldermen prior to Wednesday's vote. Thank you for helping to protect Chicago 's Culture. http://blogs.suntimes.com/derogatis/ Edited May 13, 2008 by alocispepraluger102 Quote
Ken Dryden Posted May 13, 2008 Report Posted May 13, 2008 Chicago Aldermen have a long history of being dim bulbs about economics, like the tax that was aimed solely at big box stores (even though the aldermen and their staffs shopped such stores outside Chicago while denouncing big box stores to the media). Perhaps they don't realize how much income events generate for the city. A rock concert in a baseball stadium is one thing, but this requirement would work against typical club bookings. Quote
Jazzmoose Posted May 13, 2008 Report Posted May 13, 2008 Unbelievable. They come up with a system that only the big boys can afford, and then exempt places with 500+ seats? This goes beyond stupid into the area of willfully malicious. Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted May 13, 2008 Author Report Posted May 13, 2008 UPDATE: Promoter's ordinance tabled (for now) Following a nearly unprecedented outpouring of concern from the Chicago music community and a meeting with activists and some of the top concert promoters and venue owners in Chicago, Ald. Eugene Schulter, chairman of the City Council License Committee, decided on Tuesday that he will not present the so-called "event promoter's ordinance" to the full council for a vote on Wednesday -- and that the committee will go back to work on fine-tuning the law. Schulter, several other aldermen and representatives of the city Department of Business Affairs & Licensing met with members of the Chicago Music Commission, Metro owner Joe Shanahan, Jam Productions talent booker Nick Miller, Martyr's owner Ray Quinn and Double Door co-owner Sean Mulroney Tuesday morning, a day before the law was expected to be passed by the City Council. Made aware of concerns in many corners of Chicago's arts communities, Schulter asked DBA for more facts and figures about the alleged "problem venues" and "underground promoters" that the ordinance was designed to curtail. Some of those who attended the meeting said DBA had to admit that it had no hard information and that it has not formally studied the extent of the alleged problem that the law was crafted to address; they had only the anecdotal evidence of the single tragic incident at the E2 Nightclub five years ago. The law will return to committee for more work and public input before a council vote is considered again. Schulter told the meeting he expects that process will take at least a month. "We are not sure when it will come out of committee for a vote, but we hope that Chairman Schulter will wait until he and the city have engaged the music community publicly and meaningfully so their concerns can be heard and hopefully incorporated into the eventual law," said Chicago Music Commission board member Bruce Iglauer. "We are pleased that Chairman Schulter has responded to community concerns here, and we look forward to working with him, members of the Committee, DBA staff and other music community stakeholders to come up with a workable version of the ordinance." "I feel that the cultural aspects of the city sent a message that something was in trouble in the music world over the weekend, and I feel the city listened today," Shanahan said. "People are starting to take the music community seriously. Now we have to roll up our sleeves and come up with some reasonable rules, because this isn't over." Quote
Jazzmoose Posted May 14, 2008 Report Posted May 14, 2008 Good news; thanks for the update. Sometimes when a kneejerk reaction occurs, someone's just gotta reach out and grab that knee! Quote
rpklich Posted May 14, 2008 Report Posted May 14, 2008 One of the better observers of Chicago politics is Ben Joravsky. (His articles on TIFs are scary at times.) He's written about Daley's latest taxing venture and what to expect in the Chicago Reader: http://blogs.chicagoreader.com/politics/ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.