JSngry Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 (edited) Or don't. It's the chicken's damn fault it tastes so damn good. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2xBXBKX-GM Nevertheless, I think the chicken has a beef. Edited September 17, 2011 by JSngry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceH Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 Hmmm. Is it human's fault that THEY taste so good? (Or so I've heard.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted September 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 It's from eating so much chicken. I'm a living (for the time being) witness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexander Posted September 19, 2011 Report Share Posted September 19, 2011 I've read some persuasive arguments to the effect that the precise reason that something is taboo (e.g., cannibalism, incest) is because it is/was so tempting to people. We seem to think that our aversion to eating human flesh is a part of the natural order of things. Not so, according to modern social science. Rather, our aversion is cultural. We say that it is wrong and unnatural precisely because, once upon a time, it was something we did quite often. I've heard tell that human tastes not like chicken, but rather like pork. This is the reason that some Australian aboriginal tribes referred to human meat as "long pig." It's the other, other, white meat... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceH Posted September 20, 2011 Report Share Posted September 20, 2011 White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. The other, OTHER white meat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.