Christiern Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 I just read a disturbing exchange on Steve Hoffman's board. As one whose fairly large LaserFisc collection succumbed to laser rot, I am disturbed by to learn that CDs may be suffering the same fate. Here's a link to the discussion. I'd be curious to hear from anyone here who has had (or heard of) this experience with CDs. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 I just read a disturbing exchange on Steve Hoffman's board. As one whose fairly large LaserFisc collection succumbed to laser rot, I am disturbed by to learn that CDs may be suffering the same fate. Here's a link to the discussion. I'd be curious to hear from anyone here who has had (or heard of) this experience with CDs. ← Probably the same old story told on the Hyperion site - scroll and click on "bronzing". BRONZING I had some problems with discs manufactured at the plant mentioned and some from an Italian plant. AFAIK, these problems were all caused by using the laserdisc formulations. Quote
kh1958 Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 I've been buying CDs prolifically since 1983 and have over the last few months gone through virtually my entire collection in creating an itunes music library. I only found two CDs that would not play, and one of those, I believe, was defective when I purchased it. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 I should add that all my offending cds were classical music. I've never had a jazz cd go bad. This is 'cause most were manufactured in the US, Japan or EU after the fact. Quote
Ron S Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I've never had a jazz cd go bad. This is 'cause most were manufactured in the US, Japan or EU after the fact. . . . and also 'cause there is no bad jazz. Quote
Brandon Burke Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I don't know if I'd use the word "common", but this is a known problem in the library/archives field. For this reason, archival masters (if stored on optical discs) are often commited to gold CD-Rs; the thought being that gold is closer to inert than aluminum and, thus, will take a great deal longer to react with the other substances among the disc: the plastic (Polycarbonate), the binder (adhesive), etc. Also, in the event of a colored disc, any dyes or pigments that might be involved as well. Some links: The NIST guide from 2003 includes a pretty good introcuction to the many components, layers, and competing substances among varying optical disc media. There's also this site. I can't speak to its legitimacy, but it did inspire this article in 2004 so... To Chuck's point, here's a list of comercially issued CDs known to exhibit bronzing. And like he said, all are European. A Google search for "CD rot" will bring up a lot of hits...but read them at your own risk. Quote
Dr. Rat Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 Wasn't there a problem with oxidation and pitting of some CDs i read somewhere associated with a factory called "nimbus?" --eric Quote
mikeweil Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I had one of the bronzing Hyperion CDs in question, and got a replacement - the problem was known to the label and stopped their cooperation with that pressing plant. I have one other, which is Italian and just looks very transparent - but like vinyl, one doesn't expect thes discs to last forever ......... But these are the only defective CDs among several thousand. Quote
Claude Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 (edited) Probably the same old story told on the Hyperion site - scroll and click on "bronzing". BRONZING I had some problems with discs manufactured at the plant mentioned and some from an Italian plant. AFAIK, these problems were all caused by using the laserdisc formulations. ← The only CD from my collection (2000+ discs, about 200 from the 80's) to have this effect was indeed a Hyperion release. I received replacement discs as soon as I reported the problem, 10 years after the purchase. So, so far I had no CD loss though natural degradation. I wish CD-Rs were that reliable. I had a batch of Fuji CD-Rs with Emusic downloads which became partly unreadable after just 3 years. Edited July 15, 2005 by Claude Quote
Brandon Burke Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I had one of the bronzing Hyperion CDs in question, and got a replacement - the problem was known to the label and stopped their cooperation with that pressing plant. I have one other, which is Italian and just looks very transparent - but like vinyl, one doesn't expect thes discs to last forever ......... But these are the only defective CDs among several thousand. ← Vinyl is actually pretty strong by comparison...barring any enviromnetal or structural dammage, that is. Shellac, though, is the ultimate workhorse, in terms of stability. One of the worst media is actually DAT. The shelf-life on those can sometimes be little more than a decade. I find that, despite much of our collection being 1/4" open reel tape, the DATs are in at least as much danger, as far as degradation is concerned. Quote
casanovas347 Posted July 18, 2005 Report Posted July 18, 2005 . . . and also 'cause there is no bad jazz. ← Quote
WD45 Posted July 18, 2005 Report Posted July 18, 2005 I had one of the bronzing Hyperion CDs in question, and got a replacement - the problem was known to the label and stopped their cooperation with that pressing plant. I have one other, which is Italian and just looks very transparent - but like vinyl, one doesn't expect thes discs to last forever ......... But these are the only defective CDs among several thousand. ← Vinyl is actually pretty strong by comparison...barring any enviromnetal or structural dammage, that is. Shellac, though, is the ultimate workhorse, in terms of stability. One of the worst media is actually DAT. The shelf-life on those can sometimes be little more than a decade. I find that, despite much of our collection being 1/4" open reel tape, the DATs are in at least as much danger, as far as degradation is concerned. ← Is shellac less prone to warp-age? Is that why it noses out vinyl? Quote
Brandon Burke Posted July 19, 2005 Report Posted July 19, 2005 (edited) Is shellac less prone to warp-age? Is that why it noses out vinyl? The quick and dirty answer is yes. Environmental conditions (read: heat) are the primary causes of warping. The others are [1] prolonged diagonal storage and [2] prolonged storage in horizontal piles. Basiaclly, storage in situations involving either uneven and prolonged support or uneven and prolonged pressure. Something else to consider, though it's more of an institutional worry: discs should be rotated at regular intervals so as to avoid prolonged pressure on any one point along the perimeter of the disc. Not doing so can result in a kind of warping, rippled in appreance. Under reasonable storage conditions (temp, RH, etc.) both formats should last a very long time. Shellac, I would argue, is better suited to handle heat...the most immediate cause of warping. [EDIT: Of course, that answer only addressed warping. The other thought, as I understand it, is that there are fewer potential chemical reactions in a shellac-based disc than polyvinyl chloride. This is significant when considering the types of degradation that occur when discs are indeed stored under recommended archival conditions.] Edited July 19, 2005 by Brandon Burke Quote
hockman Posted July 22, 2005 Report Posted July 22, 2005 I have found cd rot in many of my cds. These were mostly (if not all) classical cds, and generally can be traced to a polygram-related pressing plant in Germany in the 1980s (e.g. for London/Decca, DG, etc.). This is apparently a documented case, and Polygram was willing to entertain a replacement for faulty cds. Shit, despite the advertising, CDs aren't really perfect sound forever. My LPs from further back are still in fine condition, provided they haven't been abused. Hock Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.