Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The weather.com forecast usually includes an hourly probability of rain, 0%, 10%, 20% etc. My question is whether this probability is hourly only. So for example, if for each hour for the next 3 hrs it says "20% probability of rain" does that imply that the probability for rain sometime over the next three hours is 48.8%? (1 - [0.8*0.8*0.8]) Or is that just short hand for "20% probability of rain for the next few hours"?

Guy

Posted (edited)

20% rain chance means that 20% of the geographic area under consideration will see rain in a given time period. It is not cumulative.

Edited by Dan Gould
Posted

What? That makes no sense. So the chance of rain is 100% for some 20% of the geographic area?

Let's say the geographic area is Pennsylvania. Let's say the window is 3 hours. It will definitely rain somewhere in Pennsylvania during those 3 hours and the total of all the places where it rains will add up to 20% of the state?

Can't it just not rain at all anywhere in Pennsylvania during the entire 3 hours - and "oops, that was the 80%"?

Mike

Posted

What? That makes no sense. So the chance of rain is 100% for some 20% of the geographic area?

No, because there is no guarantee that rain will fall. We're talking about statistical probability, not guarantees.

Let's say the geographic area is Pennsylvania. Let's say the window is 3 hours. It will definitely rain somewhere in Pennsylvania during those 3 hours and the total of all the places where it rains will add up to 20% of the state?

Can't it just not rain at all anywhere in Pennsylvania during the entire 3 hours - and "oops, that was the 80%"?

It will not "definitely" rain somewhere. The coverage of potential rain will be 20%.

Yes there can be no rain in the given time frame, because we are talking about probability NOT absolutes.

Here's another way of putting it:

Under the present atmospheric conditions, it is likely that no more than 20% of the coverage area will see rainfall. In other words, it is probably that your area will not see rain, but if it does, don't say we didn't tell you so.

If you haven't figured it out by now, rainfall probabilities are not an exact science, or have you never had a picnic ruined by rain?

Posted

Well, the way I was taught (admittedly I was a student for only a brief time) by the Meteorology Department of Florida State was in terms of percent of a geographical region. Maybe definitions have changed since the mid 80s.

Posted

I live in an area where there is a 30% chance of rain every day during the summer. It doesn't usually rain everyday, but there's always that chance. Thunderstorms bloom up on the doppler out of nowhere. Usually not in my backyard however.

In the Virgin Islands, a storm will pass through every day pretty much without fail from April through Hurricane season, probably year 'round, I don't know. Forecast: chance of thunderstorms 100%. Easy.

Posted

Any weather forecast anywhere by anyone is not meant to be taken seriously. If there is a profession (and I use this term in its loosest possible context) that is more wrong more often than this one, enlighten me as to what it might be. One of the biggest ruses ever perpetrated on the American public is the so-called 10 day forecast. These people don't know what it's going to do tomorrow much less 10 days from now. If you sat outside in a shed with your big toe in a bell jar, you could peg the weather as well or better than the thimble brains who do this for a living.

Up overcast and out.

Posted

Any weather forecast anywhere by anyone is not meant to be taken seriously.  If there is a profession (and I use this term in its loosest possible context) that is more wrong more often than this one, enlighten me as to what it might be.  One of the biggest ruses ever perpetrated on the American public is the so-called 10 day forecast.  These people don't know what it's going to do tomorrow much less 10 days from now.  If you sat outside in a shed with your big toe in a bell jar, you could peg the weather as well or better than the thimble brains who do this for a living. 

Up overcast and out.

Yes, 10 day forecasts are ridiculous and a ruse. But meteorology is hardly a profession to be laughed at. At three and 5 days, forecast accuracy is extremely high, and as a former meteorology major, I find your comments extremely offensive.

So, Dave, do you rely on your own toe in a bell jar to decide whether to bring an umbrella with you to work or do you still actually listen to the "thimble brains" who populate this "so-called profession"??

Posted

Any weather forecast anywhere by anyone is not meant to be taken seriously.  If there is a profession (and I use this term in its loosest possible context) that is more wrong more often than this one, enlighten me as to what it might be. 

Try economics.

Posted

I live in Portland, Oregon. If I understand correctly, one of the more difficult places in the country to predict the weather. The most accurate and reliable forecast I'm aware of in this area comes in the form of a "beacon" that sits atop a building downtown called The Standard Plaza. If it's white, it will be cooler. If it's green, no change. If it's red, warmer. If any of the colors flash, you can expect some precipitation. Another technique I practice - hang onto your hat - is to go outside in the morning and look up at the sky. Unbelievably accurate.

Of course I listen to the weather forecast, but you really don't have much choice if you're the kind of news junkie I am. I just don't pay much attention. For a group of people who are right maybe half the time, they take themselves way, way too seriously.

With regard to ecomomics and accuracy I suppose there may be some validity in the comparison although I rarely get caught in the rain without an umbrella if someone says the GNP is slipping. Point being, a weather forecast is immediate and has immediate impact. Economics exists on a wholly different level.

If my comments were offensive, that was not my intent, although that characterization strikes me as a bit overreactive given the marginal seriousness my original statement. I guess what really bothers me about weathermen or anyone else for that matter is someone who acts like they know what's going on when they really don't. Come to think of it, George Bush would make a helluva weatherman.

Up over and out.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...