Jump to content

The most controversial Wikipedia pages


Recommended Posts

No I'm suggesting books like the bible were compiled, edited, added to, etc. by humans over long stretches of time and are full of unreliable bs and have the character of locked Wikipedia pages. (Not that I'm not accusing Wikipedia of being as full of shit as religious texts.)

(I see this is the Miscellaneous Non-Political section so not really the place for my remarks.)

Edited by erwbol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...