_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Dan Gould
-
Posts
21,932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Dan Gould
-
-
OK why is this so f-ing important to you?
The question was Ozempic using "It's Magic" for their ads and the fact that the lead singer/composer participated in the advertising and didn't just license his composition means he made beaucoup dinero.
-
I wish my VO coach were still alive (for more important reasons than this issue) so I could ask her.
-
Well it had to have been licensed and that happened at a time when rights holders weren't doing it on the cheap.
It's also entirely possible that they paid a smaller fee because the composers couldn't believe their good fortune and took what was offered. OTOH its been in use for a while and I think normal practice is a time-limited license, so any renewal could/should have been at a higher cost.
Wiki says that the lead singer was actually hired to record the Oh-oh-oh Ozempic line for the spot(s).
Guarantee he got paid, paid well, and has made lots more in residuals too (every 13 weeks they run a spot or reuse a track for a new spot = CHECK).
The guy who played Carleton (the doorman on Rhoda) also voiced the Parkay margarine ads in the 70s. I was told by my VO coach that he bought a ranch with the proceeds of that one recording session and called it Casa De Residuales.
-
4 hours ago, Holy Ghost said:
Okay, tangent time, but I don't know about all of you, but I'm really sick how these pharmaceutical conglomerates are inserting their catch words into classic songs into their commercials. Like how Ozempic changed Pilot's Oh it's Magic:
Too...
Too:
😐 Like, stop it!
in general I of course agree with you however, when I heard this the first time the main thing I thought was "I bet whatever band members wrote that song could really use the money" - predicated on the assumption that they were a one-hit wonder and that the tune was written by band members. If that is the case, then this isn't like licensing and ruining a hit by some guy who owns an island in the Carribean.
-
-
5 hours ago, felser said:
Agreed, this is absurd. His post-1980 output has had very spotty quality IMO, and these are outtakes!
I could not care less about this but the way these sessions are being described, they aren't really outtakes, but cohesive performances that he chose not to issue at the time.
I can't be made to care but at the age of his fans, they probably have enough cash flow to buy enough of these to make it worthwhile.
-
38 minutes ago, Matthew said:
Been busy with work, but I'm not overly excited about the trade. I'm not a fan of players who don't budge on trying to help the team by trying to play a different position. Thought Devers looked bad, but he's making all the right noises in San Francisco and Buster Posey is a big fan, and he's should know since he's turned the Giants around and added enthusiasm to the organization.
I think Kyle Harrison will turn out to be a very good pitcher, he has great stuff, is a lefty, and he's on the verge of putting things together. Should be a consistent 13 - 16 game winner according to my crystal ball. The rest of the players Boston got shouldn't add up to too much, but you never know.
Also think Boston desperately wanted out of the contract they signed with Devers, though I don't go along with the big conspiracy theory that the ownership got rid of the contract to spend the money on Manchester United, but it's not a healthy thing to have multiple franchises owned by the same corporation, some team will be left holding the short end of the stick.
The Giants are struggling right now, especially on offense, so any addition there is welcome.
I found Devers comment when this series started to be disengenuous at best ("if they had asked me in spring training to take grounders at 1B, I would have"). At the start of the season they were protecting his shoulders and had Casas recovered from his rib cage injury, with Romy Gonzalez behind him on the depth chart. There was no need for Devers to work at 1B then, the need became acute when Casas went down again.
And his interest in the team was zero, because he was still butthurt over being replaced at 3B.
I guess I should watch to see if John Henry takes on some salary to improve the team this year or if it really was to free up money for his other interests. That would be truly pathetic, even if dumping Devers was the right thing to do.
Is Harrison under team control long enough to enjoy his bright future?
-
Proof that signing Devers for a crap ton of money didn't mean shit when it came to helping the team, but now at San Fran he's happily taking ground balls at 1B. Fuck him:
Devers will likely split his time between DH and first base for now. Devers got some work in at first on Tuesday, but the Giants want to get him up to speed before they consider giving him his first start at the position.
“We talked to him a little bit today. He goes, ‘I’ll play wherever you want me to play, I’ll hit wherever you want me to hit,’” Melvin said. “He’s going to DH today. He’s going to hit in the three-spot. We’re going to work him in and get him some ground balls at first and make sure he’s comfortable before we put him over there. That’s pretty much the way we’re looking at it right now, a little bit of DH and a little bit of first.”
-
Will @Matthew stop by about Giants acquiring Devers from the Red Sox for barely more than a box of baseballs and an equipment bag? Apologies if he is not the resident Giants fan, it's been a while ...
While I wasn't thrilled at the length of the contract given to Devers, the fact remains that this is a top hitter very much at the height of his talents. It basically means that for the Red Sox to crawl into the post-season this season, at least two of three rookies have to hit as advertised, with no growing pains.
I would feel a lot better about this if the players received included someone that the Giants might actually miss in the future but this ain't that.
About the only thing I can say about it is that it (somewhat) relieves the logjam of outfielders and rookies finding playing time, and if that had necessitated sending Duran or Abreu away, I would have been quite upset. I want to see what those two can do as they are not at their peak and are very good already.
-
2 hours ago, mjzee said:
I just read a fascinating news article in the latest issue of Barron's, examining the changes in search wrought by AI. Websites are experiencing huge declines in site visitors. It used to be that one did a Google search, which would return various websites that one would click through to find what they wanted to know. Now, AI is returning answers, making it much less necessary for people to click through to other websites to find the answers. Google stock is down because of this.
This is interesting but I suspect sites like my own www.percyfrance.info and others like it won't be that effected. You'd have to have a specific question, and no other serious interest, to want to just get an AI-generated answer and move on. Obviously fan sites like mine are predicated on there existing people that are interested in what a well-curated site looks like for a topic of interest. You have to want to know more ...
-
@Coda I am sorry to hear that your wife is in such a bad mental place and if she's found help thru AI, that is good to hear.
It's also interesting that this is the same program as that featured in the NYT article.
I hope she gets the help she needs whether its thru AI or talk therapy or, if necessary, anti-depressants.
-
Any thoughts on the way AI relates with people when not used for professional or educational purposes?
The article I posted is just one of many indicators of deeply disturbing interactions that harm people in serious ways.
And to Mark Z of Facebook, I say if you want a friend, get a dog. AI "friends" are way too hazardous.
-
Curious how people are using AI as well as opinions (or even experiences) with the ways it goes off the rails, inspired by this article in the NYT:
-
3 hours ago, Rooster_Ties said:
Do me a favor: Give this track a listen, Dan. The Steve Coleman comparison is subtle, and I might be the person who even hears it that way. It’s not the tune or context that reminds me of Coleman — just something about the way Rouse uses time that does.
Humor me, Dan — how does this hit you? Let it go long enough to get into Charlie’s solo a good bit. It’s not ‘out’ at all, just modern, to my ears…
Listened to the entire track. Rouse is fine, didn't care especially for the accompaniment.
-
20 minutes ago, Rooster_Ties said:
I love Rouse’s Strata-East album. It’s different, and a little weird — and I appreciate that none of it is tepid.
I’ve even occasionally thought some of Rouse’s playing (specifically on his Strata East) reminds me a little bit of Steve Coleman — if you can believe it.
Thank you for confirming that I have absolutely no need of Rouse on Strata East.
@HutchFan's post above does pique my curiosity.
-
I don't know why I thought he had died already. Maybe I just heard that health issues meant no more public appearances?
Anyway I have never gotten deeply into the catalog that made him famous as musical/production genius, I just loved the hits off of Endless Summer which I got as a birthday gift around 1973 I think.
RIP.
-
This should be fun ... Michael Weiss as musician host, spinning his own selections and commenting on the music, with interview by Phil Schaap at the end.
https://aviary.library.vanderbilt.edu/collections/2137/collection_resources/145981
-
I heard most of the first tune and sampled up to about 20:00.
Hard pass.
-
thanks @mikeweil, I am going to have to hear some tracks before I go for this one. I hope Rouse's family is well-compensated for the reissue, I know his son is on FB and a member of the Rare Jazz Photos group.
-
If anyone can shed light ... this release is a worthy one? Seems slightly surprising to me but if Klabin was the original producer/engineer that's a leg up in giving it the Resonance treatment.
-
15 minutes ago, Pim said:
Ah Rhodesian Ridgebacks are beautiful dogs, congrats Dan! It’s only going to take a few days before he puts his teeth in that cd/dvd/book collection 😋
Right now she is afraid to jump off the couch and just stays there as long as someone is with her. She's mostly going to be in crate or playpen we set up next to my wife's desk. We're fortunate so far she's zonked out all morning so far. We have to see if playpen next to chair is better than in crate. We should enjoy the weeks we presumably have before she'll jump out of playpen as easy as pie.
-
Doesn't this make me Chick (Webb)?
-
Say Hello to Ella (Fitzgerald), a Rottie - Rhodesian Ridgeback mix we just adopted yesterday. We went to the animal rescue service for a different, older puppy but this 9 week old cutie chose me, instantly reacting to my voice and being relentless for attention. She even very amusingly gave her littermate the stink eye when he tried to horn in.
Oh, and also, another NYT article in their usually silly series:
-
29 minutes ago, felser said:
Not me, I also read "You'd be amazed at what has already been mastered...and pleased."
OK but they are working three years ahead ... so to me, absolutely zero assurance that its "just around the corner". Probable that its mastered, no idea what year it might show up.
Losing Weight - Ozempic - Diet/Exercise?
in Miscellaneous - Non-Political
Posted
Since it seems like anyone who stops the drugs gains back the weight, this is certainly good to hear.