JSngry

Or so you'd think...

They're still here: http://www.mosaiccontemporary.com/default.asp

http://www.chilloutzone.de/files/07100405.html

Quite the lineup for a vaudeville act! This was when? 1915? Yeah, "jazz gigs" as such had yet to be too much more than local things, right? So if you wanted steady bread, vaudeville was one way to get it, no? The more things change, eh? I'll make one last statement end as a question, ok?

Well, that's nice, and she shore is purty and all , and she even sings on his 2nd album (the one that's not as good as the one that she's on the cover of, well, actually, one of the ones that she's on the cover of, because she's on the cover of his remix album too), and there's a link to the video for that song in the sexy video thread (and it really is a sexy video, very coy) but really, I am making this recommendation for the music alone. It is Popalicious in a young-ish but non-kiddie type way, and boy howdy, does it satisfy!!!

According to the David Ritz bio, Marvin recorded all of his tracks while lounging on a sofa.

http://www.dustygroove.com/item.php?id=fz8...p%3Bincl_cs%3D1 Quoth The Stards: I say: And I add:

So that's what your question has been from the beginning. Poorly presented as it has been (not the least reason of which being the constant diversion of already feeble mental resources to the swatting of the gnats who insisted that I don't grasp basic math...), that has been the gist of it, yes. There've been some corollaries from that as well, but since it's taken this long just to get this far...

Y'all 'scuse me. I gotta go load 16 tons. BBT.

No, but "enjoying sexy" & "boys club mentality" are not the same thing. Now, if you want to talk about a way to have the former without the latter (and why can't/shouldn't it be done?), I'm all for that. But if you posit the possibilities as either/or, sorry, I can't go there.

Live small, die smaller. Live large, still die small. But at least you lived large.

I don't believe in the supernatural. Simple as that. I do, however, allow for the possibility that there are levels of "natural" that we have yet to discover. History/evolution would support this, no? Or do you think that we've discovered/uncovered all there is to know? Now as far as my mother-in-law goes, I believe that she is perceptive enough to pick up on those "other clues", but quite possibly/most likely subconsciously. That's why she's hard to beat at damn near any game involving anything even remotely involving "bluffing" or "calling dares". That's in no way supernatural, but it is a quality I've noticed that some people possess in greater quantity that others. Now, my question from the beginning has been - is there a way to better develop those "gifts" of perception?

Well, allowing for the distinct possibility that that is a good thing... How the hell are people going to evolve without being active? Sorry, but I don't call living by a laundry list of "potentially offensive" behaviors evolving. I call it copping out.

From my upcoming best-seller Men Are Self-Absorbed Assholes, Women Are Psychotic Bitches:

I want to apologize to everybody in the universe for being normal and for any offense that any action of mine that might have resulted from that might have caused at any point in the time-space continuum. I promise to henceforth attempt with all due diligence to be as non-offensive to everybody everywhere. I'll be in my room if you need me. But if you do, I can't guarantee anything, ok?

Hey, the SI swimsuit issue is something I routinely laugh at. I mean, yeah, the women are beautiful and shit, but... the world's full of beautiful women, if you know what I mean. One either becomes jaded, indiscriminate, or selective about what stirs one's interest beyond the temporary hormonal rush. As far as Resistol goes, as I understand it (or understood it, the last I heard of this was about 15 years ago), they can make a full year's worth of inventory in something like 9 or so months. So it's a 9-ish month gig with 3 off, kinda like teaching school.

And there's million more you don't want to know, trust me... Such as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNj1HMBl2ms Trust me, you really don't want to know.

Wally George George Wallace George Wallace

Hey, you gotta have a distinct kind of education to get off into the Resitol thing! They're located in Garland, Tx, btw, not that far from where we live. It's a seasonal operation, actually, and from what I hear, they treat their people ok, so good for them. But damned if I'm going to their university!

http://www.resistolhat.com/ From Texas with...irony

There's always some sort of larger point in question, no matter where you go or what you do. And yet life goes on. This too is non-gender-specific.

GO FOR IT!!! :tup :tup :tup :tup :tup

I am sorry to hear that this thread makes you uncomfortable, really I am. But I'd like to think that you're mature enough to realize that it's presence is in no way predicated on demeaning or otherwise diminishing you in particular or women in general. I genuinely respect your reservations, but ultimately, feeling as I do that real as they are, the benign intent of the thread are every bit as real, I defer to the right to ignore that which one finds questionable. I have a daughter, 17 years old. We've raised her to be very objective about media portrayals of female sexuality, and she's learned her lessons more than well, god bless her. But she also is fully aware that mom & dad still like to mess around, and she still know that we both are "hormonally active" outside of the bedroom. As far as it pertains to us, her parents, she still finds it kind of...icky but as applied to humans in general, she gets it a lot better than do most of her peers. Point being - she knows enough to know that sexuality is better off not being one-dimensional as far as it pertains to occupying a place in a person's life, just as she knows that laughing at a "dead baby" joke (remember those?) doesn't mean that she actually digs dead babies. In fact, my daughter would make an excellent addition to this community. She's smart, witty, sharp as a new tack, would take these type threads for what they are (and roll her eyes at them, as well she should, and as, truthfully, do a lot of us who participate in them - the male sense of irony is very under-appreciated by many women, it seems to me) and very interested in a lot of different things. Unfortunately, jazz is not one of them. Oh well...

True, but if anybody's thinking that there is no more Borders site with "rewards" (and no, nobody did, yet) then there it is.