billyboy Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 This disc is now available at Yourmusic.com for 5.99. It's in my queue! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Stream Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I got this and didn't really take to it....maybe someday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 It's worth keeping. Personally, I think it suffers from some of the same kind of mix-and-match juxtaposition and conflict as the Paul Anka record (totally different sets of juxtaposition and conflict, but same kind of uncomfortable tension is developed at times). Interesting, sometimes hititng on all cylenders, sometimes just not working. Davis gestures toward this, but doesn't really give us much of a handle on why the tension's there. (I'd call his talk of jazz time and funk time . . . impressionistic) He's more at a level of saying "this project is an intereting oddity, why did it happen?" much like someone might try to expalin the Anka record. I'd be interested in seeing the McBride notes, but I have a feeling he might like it a little too well to write productively of the album's significant defects. --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 I liked it. I just listened to it casually a few times so far with one sit down and really listen session that I enjoyed. I felt James was totally within the elements of the whole session. I didn't read the liner notes. I'm so bored reading liner notes. I rarely read them with attention except on the most historical of releases. . . . I mean so few are as good as Chri A's for the Mosaic Verve set, the notes to almost any Jazz Oracle, or the notes to Bix Restored Vol. 5 or a handful of others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 I liked it. I just listened to it casually a few times so far with one sit down and really listen session that I enjoyed. I felt James was totally within the elements of the whole session. Really? That obviously wasn't my impression at all. Back to the listening woodshed for me! I didn't read the liner notes. I'm so bored reading liner notes. I rarely read them with attention except on the most historical of releases. . . . I mean so few are as good as Chri A's for the Mosaic Verve set, the notes to almost any Jazz Oracle, or the notes to Bix Restored Vol. 5 or a handful of others. ← Liner notes have really gotten to be a tired custom, I think. I like to know the basic circumstances of a session, but beyond that it seems very few records inspire good essays. I know I have a tough time writing record reviews anymore--I feel like most of the time I'm just churning up a vast pool of cliches. That's the point I think behind Joel Dorn's goofy notes. --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 That's how I heard it. There is very little in any style of American music that James Brown then could not pull off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted August 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 It's worth keeping. Personally, I think it suffers from some of the same kind of mix-and-match juxtaposition and conflict as the Paul Anka record (totally different sets of juxtaposition and conflict, but same kind of uncomfortable tension is developed at times). I'd be interested in seeing the McBride notes, but I have a feeling he might like it a little too well to write productively of the album's significant defects. "Uncomfortable tension"? Uncomfortable for who? And why? Hmmmmm... "Significant defects"? Brown is Brown, Bellson is Bellson, & Nelson is Nelson. Nobody budges, and nobody sounds uncomfortable (hell, Brown sounds every bit as rambling and semi-conscious doing the obviously pre-scripted rap on "I Need Your Key" as he does on the equally obviously spur-of-the-moment "Escape-ism"). That might be a"defect" for some, but I think it's a gas, one of those off-the-wall collaborations that works just because nobody's trying to do anything other than what they do, and because everybody's digging on everybody else's vibe. No, not every song "works". "What Kind Of Fool Am I" in particular is kind of a farce. But that song's gonna be a farce no matter who does it, and I'd just as soon hear a farce by James Brown, Louis Bellson, & Oliver Nelson as I would by anybody. More than most, actually. Geez, you kids today, everything's gotta be so damn "contextual" and shit. No wonder jazz is dead! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 (edited) It's worth keeping. Personally, I think it suffers from some of the same kind of mix-and-match juxtaposition and conflict as the Paul Anka record (totally different sets of juxtaposition and conflict, but same kind of uncomfortable tension is developed at times). I'd be interested in seeing the McBride notes, but I have a feeling he might like it a little too well to write productively of the album's significant defects. "Uncomfortable tension"? Uncomfortable for who? And why? Hmmmmm... "Significant defects"? Brown is Brown, Bellson is Bellson, & Nelson is Nelson. Nobody budges, and nobody sounds uncomfortable (hell, Brown sounds every bit as rambling and semi-conscious doing the obviously pre-scripted rap on "I Need Your Key" as he does on the equally obviously spur-of-the-moment "Escape-ism"). That might be a"defect" for some, but I think it's a gas, one of those off-the-wall collaborations that works just because nobody's trying to do anything other than what they do, and because everybody's digging on everybody else's vibe. No, not every song "works". "What Kind Of Fool Am I" in particular is kind of a farce. But that song's gonna be a farce no matter who does it, and I'd just as soon hear a farce by James Brown, Louis Bellson, & Oliver Nelson as I would by anybody. More than most, actually. Geez, you kids today, everything's gotta be so damn "contextual" and shit. No wonder jazz is dead! ← Well I can only speak directly for my own uncomfortable tension. I can say, too, that it isn't my reaction alone--some of the other folk around here--some more casual listeners, but some fairly serious about music--reacted to the record in a similar fashion to me. I'll say this--it's a similar sort of uncomfortable that I feel listening to Mark Murphy sometimes. Though Murphy's deal doesn't always work out, either, I get a feeling he's an experienced surfer on these big band seas of troubles and conflicts. On the context thing: I love deep context, but not so much so as to obliterate direct experience. Just that the experience I have with parts of this record needs explaining! --eric Edited August 12, 2005 by Dr. Rat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free For All Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 (edited) No, not every song "works". "What Kind Of Fool Am I" in particular is kind of a farce. But that song's gonna be a farce no matter who does it, and I'd just as soon hear a farce by James Brown, Louis Bellson, & Oliver Nelson as I would by anybody. More than most, actually. ← Although there is a very nice version of this tune on a Bill Evans solo recording. Agreed, though, that it has great potential for corniness. Edited August 13, 2005 by Free For All Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenLowe Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 well, James Brown did say in his first aubiography that he does not like the blues, and that his favorite singer was Bing Crosby - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted August 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 Well I can only speak directly for my own uncomfortable tension. I can say, too, that it isn't my reaction alone--some of the other folk around here--some more casual listeners, but some fairly serious about music--reacted to the record in a similar fashion to me. Well, hey, yeah, um, er. yeah. I know people like that too. But only casually, if you get my drift. Life's too short! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Well I can only speak directly for my own uncomfortable tension. I can say, too, that it isn't my reaction alone--some of the other folk around here--some more casual listeners, but some fairly serious about music--reacted to the record in a similar fashion to me. Well, hey, yeah, um, er. yeah. I know people like that too. But only casually, if you get my drift. Life's too short! ← Life's too short: now there's a phrase I think ought to be sent to the old dust bin of history. Life's too short to think, life's too short to drive anything smaller than a UPS truck, life's too short not to spend $30 on a bottle of wine. It's like the blanket excuse to live life like a sucker. Every time I hear this phrase now I mentally append "to actually live it." I'm more of a Whitman man myself. Life may be too short, bit there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it except live it, and there's no point in trying to repress the multitudes, cause they're in you. --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Johnson Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Life's too short: now there's a phrase I think ought to be sent to the old dust bin of history. Life's too short to think, life's too short to drive anything smaller than a UPS truck, life's too short not to spend $30 on a bottle of wine. It's like the blanket excuse to live life like a sucker. Every time I hear this phrase now I mentally append "to actually live it." I'm more of a Whitman man myself. Life may be too short, bit there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it except live it, and there's no point in trying to repress the multitudes, cause they're in you. --eric Life's too short to pontificate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Life's too short: now there's a phrase I think ought to be sent to the old dust bin of history. Life's too short to think, life's too short to drive anything smaller than a UPS truck, life's too short not to spend $30 on a bottle of wine. It's like the blanket excuse to live life like a sucker. Every time I hear this phrase now I mentally append "to actually live it." I'm more of a Whitman man myself. Life may be too short, bit there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it except live it, and there's no point in trying to repress the multitudes, cause they're in you. --eric Life's too short to pontificate. ← More a rant, no? Perhaps I flatter myself! --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted August 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 I like Whitman too. Good candy. Life's too short not to eat some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 I like Whitman too. Good candy. Life's too short not to eat some. ← Too chewy. Maybe if you could get someone to do the chewing for you. --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe G Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 For some things, life is too short. For others, it's too long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Rat Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 For some things, life is too short. For others, it's too long. ← No just right stuff, Goldilocks? --eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe G Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Won't know that until it's over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kari S Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Just noticed this: http://www.hollywoodbowl.com/tix/performan...ail.cfm?id=2683 James Brown: Soul On Top Jazz at the Bowl JZ1-HB Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 8:00 PM Hollywood Bowl 2301 N. Highland Avenue Hollywood, CA (323) 850-2000 Artists: James Brown Angie Stone Program: In a one-of-a-kind concert, the Godfather of Funk revisits his 1969 jazz big band album Soul On Top. Backed by a big band, with original arrangements by Oliver Nelson, Brown sings standards and vamps up one or two of his classics with swinging style. R&B queen Angie Stone opens the show. --- I know it isn't until September, but I'm already intrigued by this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.