Jump to content

Belt drives vs direct drives


Stefan Wood

Recommended Posts

This question came to mind as I was browsing for a new turntable. I noticed a lot of them are belt drives. I have a Marantz direct drive turntable, which is fine. I'm just wondering what the difference is, and if direct drives are better, why are the high end models belt driven and not otherwise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My general consensus from audiophiles is that most of the diehards prefer belt drives. . . They feel these are on better tables and that may be true: at the higher price points it seems that belt drives are employed in the last decade or two.

I've had both, and each table I have had had pluses and minuses and I'll be damned if I could point to the belt or direct drive as responsible ultimately for either advantages or disadvantages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the 80's direct drive turntables were considered "high tech", that's why many makers switched to this technology, including traditional companies like Dual or Thorens which exclusively used belt drive before. The current entry level turntables (Rega, Pro-Ject) as well as most high end models use belt drive again.

Direct drive is indispensable for DJs, because the motor can accelerate the platter to the right speed a lot quicker than with belt drive. "Scratching" is only possible with direct-driven turntables. This is of course irrelevant for the normal home listener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. Then I guess the next question would be: what's the difference in sound between the two? Less rumble?

This is precisely the argument for belt-driven tables, as there is nothing in the way of "contact" between the motor and the stylus save for a stretch of rubber. I can see it either way. I had a belt-driven Thorens for a couple of years but now have two Technics 1200mkII's with Shure cartridges. Did I notice a major difference? No.

In my opinion, if you think you're going to notice a pronounced difference between belt and direct-drive then play it safe and go belt. I've worn both pairs of shoes and love my Technics just the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked someone's who's opinion on analog matters I value, and here was his response:

" do prefer belt drive and think they're better, because of the precision robust beearings involved most of the time. You don’t usually put a bearing in a diret Drive like that. Same with the related platters being 13lbs and up in weight plus the huge thickness of materials used. The motor is much more isolated offsetting the platter and ran by a belt, tape or string. Micro Seiki made both, the highest end ones in their line were belt drive. The only really exclusive high end Direct Drive Company was Goldmund. AFAIK

One last thing, you don’t have to worry about mounting the motor in a Belt Drive table. It seems like better engineering."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me the relative simplicity of a belt drive table gives it a reliability advantage, i.e. a lot fewer things to go wrong. I recall someone telling me once a long time ago that belt drives only have about three moving parts.

Up over and out.

I'm going to respectfully disagree with this statement. The reason why Technics 1200s were adopted by hip hop DJs as the 'no-brainer' set-up back in the 80's is, other than the aforementioned direct-drive capacities, because they're built like freakin' TANKS. I mean, let's face it...they aren't cheap. Mine were $400 a piece. Don't for a second overlook the fact that DJs have to haul thier equipment around like any other "musican". So the fact that you can safely take a 1200 all over creation (including regular trips as "luggage" on airplanes), in my mind, says volumes about their durability.

In my estimation, the sole benefit to a belt drive is, again, the distance you get from the motor to the stylus. The ability to notice these differences is, of course, assuming that you have as little *white noise* in the room as possible (including, but not limited to, air conditioning, ceiling fans, the refrigerator, other folks in the room, etc). In other words, you need near-complete silence to notice the differences. And, frankly, I prefer an existence involving people enjoying themselves, drinking wine, etc. My opinion is that the rumble you might get from a direct-drive table is so minimal that you'd have to be alone--and I mean with the air conditioning off and, perhaps even, with expensive headphones on--to notice the difference. And if that's your M.O. then I think you need (another) hobby...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main advantage of belt drive as I understand it is that the belt acts as a "filter" for noise and rumble from the motor. The platter is isolated from the motor noise.

Belt or direct, the quality of engineering is paramount -- the devil is in the details of execution. However, a lot of the high end turntables, e.g. Basis, Linn, Clearaudio, etc. utilize belt drive, which maybe tells you which is considered superior in the audiophile world. Or perhaps it is easier to successfully engineer a good belt drive turntable than a direct drive one.

Hock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay, after some searching, I made the plunge and bought a Goldring turntable, the new one that the audiophile mags have been raving about. I'll let you know how it sounds -- I ordered via internet -- as well as to try to justify my spending almost $400....... Music is hazardous to one's wallet. :excited:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made the plunge and bought a Goldring turntable, the new one that the audiophile mags have been raving about.

Is that the one based on the Rega P2?

I took the plunge in Jan this year due entirely to this forum and got a Rega P3 , i've not looked back, I love the sound of vinyl, the feel. I'll be upgrading the tone arm/ rca cabling later this year but for now it's sublime. :tup:tup:tup

Sadly it makes my CD player seem uninviting.... bit of snag given the number of CDs I have... :tdown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Goldring is based on the Rega 2, and comes with the Goldring Elektra cartridge. It is supposed to have an excellent tonearm, construction, etc. After listening to all this classical music, I thought it was best to make a change.

I have no problems with cds, and I have waaay too much! You know, cds like Andrew Hill's Passing Ships just isn't going to make an appearance on lp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the Goldring Turntable today and am listening to it right now. What a difference! The sound is much richer and dynamic. I was a little concerned when I picked it up -- not too heavy, but looking at it, they concentrated on all the parts that matter -- the motor, the arm, and included their own Elektra cartridge as well. It took about 5 minutes to put it together, calibrate the arm, and plug it in. There is no ground wire, something new to me, which probably tells you I've been using some old turntables. Plexi cover, platter and felt mat (which I replaced with an antistatic one), and three feet (another new one to me). It is one solid machine. My only complaint is that why can't they make rca plugs to the table so you can attach a better interconnect to it. A minor complaint, though. This is sweet! :g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made the plunge and bought a Goldring turntable, the new one that the audiophile mags have been raving about.

Is that the one based on the Rega P2?

I took the plunge in Jan this year due entirely to this forum and got a Rega P3 , i've not looked back, I love the sound of vinyl, the feel. I'll be upgrading the tone arm/ rca cabling later this year but for now it's sublime. :tup:tup:tup

Sadly it makes my CD player seem uninviting.... bit of snag given the number of CDs I have... :tdown

I have had a Rega P3 for several years. It will make anyone a vinylphile. I really, really like it :wub:

I know that some audiophiles have replaced the tonearm, but, frankly, I don't know why you would do that with a P3, as the RB 300 is a terrific arm. Indeed, it appears in various guises on more expensive TTs.

BTW, do you have the P3 in "basic black"? I do, and sort of regret it. I should have bought the blue one! :g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the Goldring Turntable today and am listening to it right now. What a difference! The sound is much richer and dynamic. I was a little concerned when I picked it up -- not too heavy, but looking at it, they concentrated on all the parts that matter -- the motor, the arm, and included their own Elektra cartridge as well. It took about 5 minutes to put it together, calibrate the arm, and plug it in. There is no ground wire, something new to me, which probably tells you I've been using some old turntables. Plexi cover, platter and felt mat (which I replaced with an antistatic one), and three feet (another new one to me). It is one solid machine. My only complaint is that why can't they make rca plugs to the table so you can attach a better interconnect to it. A minor complaint, though. This is sweet! :g

Great! It may even sound better after the cartridge 'breaks in", I know mine did.

It's nice how most of the new(and even older) tt are built. My tt is 20 years old, but if anything breaks it's easy to fix, except the tonearm. Replacement parts are readily available. If the motor goes it will be costly, but still worth it to slap another one in there. If you do not drop the tt, the bearing should last a long time as long as you keep it oiled per instructions. I change oil every year or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only complaint is that why can't they make rca plugs to the table so you can attach a better interconnect to it.

I know what you mean, but all is not lost if you want to upgrade your tonearm cable.

Unless I'm mistaken, your cable runs fron the bottom of the tonearm(usually the connector is a DIN plug..5 little holes in it) out to your pre-amp/amp, where it connects with RCA's. Many after market tonearm cables are available. Ranging in price from $75-$1000 :lol: . Do a search for tonearm cables. Many high-end interconnect and speaker cable companies include them in their line. You just will not see them in the brick and morter stores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I have had a Rega P3 for several years.  It will make anyone a vinylphile.  I really, really like it  :wub:

Same here. I've been enjoying my Rega P3 for more than three years now, and I've enjoyed every minute. I put a Dynavector 10x4 Mk II cartridge on it, and the combination delivers beautiful sound. I don't really feel the need to investigate anything "better."

Mine is black too. I actually think it's a cool, classic look. And the bright red Dyna cart looks great on it ...

Edited by j_par
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...