7/4 Posted December 26, 2005 Report Share Posted December 26, 2005 December 26, 2005 Critics' Choice: New CD's Making a Trumpet an Agent of Change By BEN RATLIFF Miles Davis "The Cellar Door Sessions, 1970" (Sony Legacy) Except to the few jazz experts who have looked at it aerially and mapped it out, Miles Davis's first electric period, from 1969 to 1975, feels like a dark labyrinth, or a frustration dream. He worked hard, and created a body of recorded work that was caustic, unrecognizable, spooky. In spots, the passageways become tiny and dark; waves of musicians, hired for an hour or a month or a year, fade in and out, all subsumed by rhythm. The sound balloons, growing dense and disjunctive and bluntly repetitive, and then winnows down to an ominous rustle. But "The Cellar Door Sessions, 1970," a new six-CD box set full of live Miles Davis music, represents a stretch when Davis was making organic, linear music. It is six musicians in a working band, making sense of a new paradigm on a nightclub stage in Washington, from a Wednesday to a Saturday. Along with Davis on trumpet, they are the keyboardist Keith Jarrett, the saxophonist Gary Bartz, the bassist Michael Henderson, the drummer Jack DeJohnette and the percussionist Airto Moreira. By the end of the week, joined by the guitarist John McLaughlin, the band grows to seven. About 80 minutes of this music was used on the 1971 album "Live-Evil," and the rest appears here for the first time. The performances follow the principles of jazz as we all know it, with rigorous collective improvisation building up arcs of tension. But the sounds and the rhythms connote another discipline altogether: electric funk, shocked and altered through wah-wah and distortion pedals. One of the assumptions that Davis was stepping on - with help from his producer, Teo Macero - was that there needed to be a stratified difference between performance and studio recordings. Columbia, his label, was already in the practice of recording many of his gigs. But the trumpeter and the producer didn't want to just make live albums: they became wickedly creative with the editing razor, making collages with completely different songs from live tapes and even studio jams. Some of the final products could be wrenching, discontinuous, provocative. But they were only emphasizing the provocations already there. By the time of "Cellar Door," Davis was scraping off the outer levels of the sound that made him famous, masking and distorting his instrument. It wasn't just that he wouldn't play "Bye Bye Blackbird" anymore; suddenly he wasn't making the trumpet sound like a trumpet. At times, on "Cellar Door," the electric guitar sounds like a keyboard, which sounds like a trumpet, which sounds like a percussion instrument - specifically, the cuíca, the Brazilian friction drum that whines and sighs as it changes pitch. As much as Davis alters himself, you hear his phrases, and even his tone, at the core of that changed sound. It's still him. In everyday terms, this box set is too much music. One of these discs alone, perhaps the second or the sixth, can be nearly overwhelming; each demands concentration. But for now that's beside the point. It's filling a hole in general knowledge, and it establishes better than before that there was, in fact, a third great Miles Davis group beyond the quintets of the 1950's and 60's. Through each complete live set, the members of the band are listening rigorously to one other and Davis is working to build something coherent for his audience. In "Honky Tonk," he pulls that coherence across a slow, tense ooze; in "Directions" and "What I Say," the band plays fast and athletically, with Mr. DeJohnette coming on the second and fourth beat, and Mr. Henderson leaving space between short, wriggling bass figures. Jimi Hendrix had died three months before these shows, and sometimes Davis seems to be trying to keep pace with the sound of Hendrix's Band of Gypsies. (Several bass lines refer directly to a few Hendrix songs that were not even a year old.) Mr. Bartz keeps the music earthy, with blues-tonality phrases. Mr. McLaughlin, with his bright, slashing fusillades, shows up on the two final discs, and "Live-Evil" tilted toward his presence. Yet he wasn't strictly necessary. The central force in the band, beneath Davis's imposing gestures, is Mr. Jarrett, battling with two Fender keyboards: an electric piano and an organ. As Mr. Jarrett writes in the box set's liner notes, he abominated both instruments, but asked to play one or the other, he decided to play them simultaneously, and through effects pedals, to sound as unkeyboardlike as he could. His performances are stunning: he pulls the music taut, elaborates in long, aggressive sweeps on the short written motives and the harmonies, tirelessly explores the instruments' porridgey noises, making notes splat and shriek and tinkle. He doesn't let up. He has four discrete solo improvisations on the set, but you can drop in nearly anywhere and see for yourself: he's thinking orchestrally, making a great deal happen at once. BEN RATLIFF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregK Posted December 27, 2005 Report Share Posted December 27, 2005 The central force in the band, beneath Davis's imposing gestures, is Mr. Jarrett, battling with two Fender keyboards: an electric piano and an organ. Agree 100% with this. His playing on this box set is unlike anything else I have heard him play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Twizzle Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 (ratliff also wrote one of most inane, insulting cat power reviews a few years ago too; hint: he couldn't fuck her, so call her-- in so many words-- a no-talent... riiiiiiiiiiight.) helluva of a way to treat Marion McPartland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon abbey Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 In everyday terms, this box set is too much music. ratliff, lest anyone forget, is a world class douche & if he's shrewd enough to bluff it sometimes, please don't let this essential fact go unrecognized or unremarked. i pointedly ignore the dipshit now-- i loathe his racist/classist creep paper too, from the left-- but whenever i bump into him... like here... who gives a good goddamn for "everyday terms" and, who's he to claim what's "too much"? imagine being at one of those gigs where miles opened for the dead? was that "too much" that day also? (ratliff also wrote one of most inane, insulting cat power reviews a few years ago too; hint: he couldn't fuck her, so call her-- in so many words-- a no-talent... riiiiiiiiiiight.) um, jealous much? ben happens to be one of the nicest people I've met in my life, and if he wrote a less than laudatory piece on the vastly overrated ms. marshall after one of her starving for attention, public breakdown sets, it certainly had nothing to do with anything extramusical. anyway, pretty sure I know who this is now. just another bitter critic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Is "abominated" really a word? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:.impossible Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 I have heard of the abominable snowman before. Pretty sure its the same thing as a Yetti. Don't know about unkeyboardlike, though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejp626 Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Is "abominated" really a word? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest akanalog Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 cat power does suck. no reason to be nice to someone just because she is mentally unstable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon abbey Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 cat power does suck. no reason to be nice to someone just because she is mentally unstable. she's talented, actually, I saw her do a very nice duo improv set with Loren Mazzacane Connors during his 50th birthday month at Tonic in 1999. but from all reports, the bulk of her concerts are (or were, at least) duds, and she could use generally more interesting backing musicians on her records, at least she started working some with the Dirty Three guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7/4 Posted January 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Don't know about Cat, but Ben is cool by me. Fine to hang with. But he has to get his ass down to the O gig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest akanalog Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 ok you are right. sucks is a personal opinion. but i think it would not be out of the realm of possibility for a music critic to pan her abilities without pointing to a rejected sexual overture as the reason why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:.impossible Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 More info posted by Clem elsewhere, and really moving the original thread more off-topic... On January 24, 2006, Matador will be releasing the long-awaited new studio album from Cat Power, 'The Greatest' on CD and LP in most major industrial countries. Recorded at Memphis, TN's Ardent Studios over the summer by Stuart Sikes, 'The Greatest' while the most confident and life-affirming work of Chan Marshall's career, is as intensely personal, haunting and provocative as any of its predecessors. The album's players are a bona fide All-Star team of Memphis musicians, including Al Green sideman Teenie Hodges on guitar, Leroy "Flick" Hodges and David Smith on bass, Rick Steff on keys, Jim Spake on sax and trumpteer Scott Thompson amongst others. ::: :: : :: ::: aknalog, why do you say Cat Power sucks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest akanalog Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 i saw her live a few times and it was horrible. not my kind of music to begin with and i imagine things might have improved since then but it seemed like she was getting press for the wrong reasons-like how bad her performances were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.