Guy Berger Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 I heard the piano-and-voice version first, and strongly prefer it to the earlier, rock-and-orchestra version. The latter strikes me as a lot of empty bombast. Whereas the stark arrangement on the 1990 version (as well as Gabriel's more ragged voice) brings out a lot more of the lyrics' emotional resonance. Guy Quote
Quincy Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Didn't vote, as I prefer the version on Robert Fripp's Exposure. Quote
B. Clugston Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 Didn't vote, as I prefer the version on Robert Fripp's Exposure. That's the only one I've heard, though isn't that the version that turned up on the Gabriel compilation? Or is there another version? Quote
GregK Posted June 19, 2007 Report Posted June 19, 2007 which one is the Fripp version? I would select that one. Quote
Guy Berger Posted June 20, 2007 Author Report Posted June 20, 2007 D'oh, I forgot about the version on Exposure. (Which I haven't heard.) The piano-and-voice version appears on Gabriel's Shaking the Tree compilation and was recorded in 1990. I assume that's also the version on the more recent 2 cd compilation. Guy Quote
Jim Alfredson Posted June 20, 2007 Report Posted June 20, 2007 I think in general Gabriel's first solo record is over-produced. There are some great songs on there, including Solsbury Hill, but the production is just over the top. I'm glad he switched producers when he did. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.