Jump to content

Am I the only one who finds Fred Hersch......


AllenLowe

Recommended Posts

What's curious about that though is that Hammerstein adopted the same approach earlier on with Jerome Kern. Yet Kern and Hammerstein songs have much more readily become jazz standards: All the Things You Are, Why Was I Born, Old Man River, etc. And apparently these tunes are often very harmonically complex (Kern worried that All the Things You are wouldn't register with the public, for instance).

Rodgers seems to have allowed his music to become a lot more staid under Hammerstein's influence than Kern did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was just perusing his web site; really the first time I have listened to him after hearing him praised to the skies by rational people; so I was surprised I found his work so soporific.

it had almost a new-age veneer, though it was superior new age. No edge, no sense of deep search. Just a very competent skimming of the surface.

Allen, you ought to see the man live once or twice before finalizing judgment. "Perusing his web site" shows no sense of deep search, just a skimming of the surface. ;-)

I like Hersch very much in trio. His solo efforts are better than Keith Jarrett's, anyway. Now those are soporific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's curious about that though is that Hammerstein adopted the same approach earlier on with Jerome Kern. Yet Kern and Hammerstein songs have much more readily become jazz standards: All the Things You Are, Why Was I Born, Old Man River, etc. And apparently these tunes are often very harmonically complex (Kern worried that All the Things You are wouldn't register with the public, for instance).

Rodgers seems to have allowed his music to become a lot more staid under Hammerstein's influence than Kern did.

You're right. I hadn't thought of that before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Hersch very much in trio. His solo efforts are better than Keith Jarrett's, anyway. Now those are soporific.

I don't like Jarrett's solo marathons much, but I wouldn't call them soporific. In fact, the one I do like is probably the one most likely to be called soporific, Vienna Concert.

A player I find a total bore solo who is good in a trio setting is Enrico Pieranunzi.

Edited by Pete C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A player I find a total bore solo who is good in a trio setting is Enrico Pieranunzi.

I thought of him each time I opened this thread ... he can swing like mo-fo if he's in the right mood and has the right guys with him (Joey Baron, Idris Muhammad), but he often just plays nicely without grabbing my attention much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers seems to have allowed his music to become a lot more staid under Hammerstein's influence than Kern did.

I wouldn't call Rodgers later music 'staid'. It might sound staid because it became one of the middle-of-the-road sounds by the 60s. But it's very rich harmonically - there are some heart stopping modulations. I was listening to Harry Allen's version of South Pacific yesterday and what I noticed was how the jazz versions actually iron out much of that richness in order to make it jazz-worthy. In its orginal form 'My girl back home' is a wonderful evocation of nostalgia for home, brilliantly evoked in the music; in the jazz version that tristese is lost.

I wonder how much of the seeming resistance to Rogers-Hammerstein songs in the jazz world has to do with their work being perceived as being overly sentimental, even corny. (Which it is sometimes, but not always.) It certainly doesn't fit with the "hip" ethos of the 50s and 60s...

I think that's much closer to the mark. Those musicals are extremely sentimental - I wouldn't go near 'The Sound of Music' for decades after an infatuation with it as a ten year old. But I watched it again a couple of years back and was enchanted.

The streetwise wise-crackers of Rodgers and Hart songs are always going to have more kudos than nuns and kids dressed in curtains. But I think that disguises a richness in Rodgers music that the knowing music fan often misses but the general public gets without even thinking about it.

Edited by A Lark Ascending
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much of the seeming resistance to Rogers-Hammerstein songs in the jazz world has to do with their work being perceived as being overly sentimental, even corny. (Which it is sometimes, but not always.) It certainly doesn't fit with the "hip" ethos of the 50s and 60s...

I think that's much closer to the mark. Those musicals are extremely sentimental - I wouldn't go near 'The Sound of Music' for decades after an infatuation with it as a ten year old. But I watched it again a couple of years back and was enchanted.

The streetwise wise-crackers of Rodgers and Hart songs are always going to have more kudos than nuns and kids dressed in curtains. But I think that disguises a richness in Rodgers music that the knowing music fan often misses but the general public gets without even thinking about it.

Oh, there are some "wise-cracker" songs in at least one Rodgers-Hammerstein show, but those songs were cut from the movie version. Cue "How Can Love Survive" from one of the original cast albums (stage) of "The Sound of Music"...sung by Max (booking agent) and the Baroness:

No little shack do you share with me,

We do not flee from the mortgagee,

Nary a care in the world have we;

How Can Love Survive?

You're fond of bonds and you own a lot.

I have a plane and a diesel yacht,

Plenty of nothing you haven't got

How Can Love Survive?

No rides for us on the top of a bus

In the face of the freezing breezes.

You reach your goals in your comfy old Rolls

Or in one of your Mercedes!

Far, very far off the beam are we,

Quaint and bizarre as a team are we,

Two millionaires with a dream are we,

We're keeping romance alive.

Two millionaires with a dream are we,

We'll make our love survive

No little cold water flat have we,

Warmed by a glow of insolvency,

Up to your necks in security.

How Can Love Survive?

How can I show what I feel for you?

I cannot go out and steal for you,

I cannot die like Camille for you.

How Can Love Survive?

You millionaires with financial affairs

Are too busy for simple pleasure.

When you are poor it is toujours l'amour,

For l'amour all the poor have leisure!

Caught in our gold plated chains are we,

Lost in our wealthy domains are we,

Trapped by our capital gains are we,

But we'll keep romance alive.

Trapped by your capital gains are we,

We'll (You'll) make our (your) love survive

Back to the overall take on the shows: I think another thing that changed drastically - re. musical theater in general - is that the Rodgers-Hammerstein shows wedded the book to the songs, and vice versa. This is a major change from the era of Rodgers-Hart, the Gershwins, et. al., when the plot and characters were thin, one-dimensional, disposable - and often, interchangeable.

Not so with Rodgers-Hammerstein, or much else in musical theater from the 50s on.

Edited by seeline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...