Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Scott. I think he's a definite upgrade at the position.  I don't know if they plan to try to keep him after next year.  They also signed Asdubral Cabrera (hope I've not massacred his surname) for two years at $9 M which I was excited about at first but on MLB Radio yesterday, Steve Phillips said that he has no range and that the Mets already had guys with no range at a cheaper price. Moreover, what was the hurry in signing him as he'd probably be around in January.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd be getting yourself a HELL of a player if it happens. He might be the hardest working, and most humble man in the game. 

Highly touted coming out of college as a star third baseman. He struggled in his early years, and then had a monster hip injury. He rehabbed like a beast to get back in the field, but the injury had taken away his ability to play third. So he went back to AAA to learn how to play left field as a last ditch attempt to save his career. 

The rest is history. 

We'll miss him around here, but we understand the reality of being a small market team. And we can't afford to get caught up in long-term, high dollar contracts. 

Edited by Scott Dolan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brad said:

Well, another crazy signing by the Cubs for a guy whose stats are not that overwhelming.  Just imagine what Harper will command if he comes onto the free agent market. 

Traditional stats, no. But Heywood is only 26, his defense is tremendous, great OBP skills, steals bases with a high success rate and when you consider the lineup he is joining, he does not need to be big bopper in order for the team to have success.  He could easily slot in behind Zobrist and bat 2nd, two table-setters in front of Rizzo and all the rest.

The Cubs would be in fantastic shape if they'd gotten David Price but this is a pretty great off-season for a team that won 97 games and eliminated the two teams that won more and ended up in LCS.  World Champions or Bust, and I bet they do it in the next 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His OPS is ordinary and he's a nice player but nothing more than that.  So they spent $184 M for a nice player and $56 M for a utility player.  Well, it's nice to have money to waste.

I'm also puzzled by his passing up a superior offer from the Cardinals  

I think they needed to improve in starting pitching and they only made a slight dent there.  Hitting was not their problem. 

Edited by Brad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

????

What did the Cardinals offer him? I never saw a definitive number.

Oh, and Heyward had 3 errors on 303 chances last year. That rather amazing. And while his power may not be All Star, his OBP is. 

 

Here, found this:

"Two sources confirmed for The Post-Dispatch that the Cardinals’ offer was greater in guaranteed value while the Cubs’ had the higher annual average value, at $23 million a year."

So it was really an either/or. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brad said:

His OPS is ordinary and he's a nice player but nothing more than that.  So they spent $184 M for a nice player and $56 M for a utility player.  Well, it's nice to have money to waste.

I'm also puzzled by his passing up a superior offer from the Cardinals  

I think they needed to improve in starting pitching and they only made a slight dent there.  Hitting was not their problem. 

1. Zobrist is not a utility player  - he's a starter who happens to play all around the field. Aside from 2015 he played in a minimum of 146 games a year for 6 straight seasons.

2.  Heywood is a "nice player" only if you're hung up on standard counting stats.  Advanced metrics say he's quite a bit more than that and again, at 26 he can be expected to be entering his prime. If he was nothing more than "nice" why would such a smart front office like the Cards offer him even more than the Cubs did?  Alex Gordon isn't the worse back up plan but he's still their number two target behind Heywood.

And, for all the money they committed, Heywood has not one but two years when he will be able to opt out.  If the market looks huge and he puts up power numbers close to his single season high of 27, he can opt out and someone else can take on the risk of him on the wrong side of 30. So long as the Cubs cash in in those first four years I don't think anyone will care that much.  As you say, he's just a nice player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say Heyward wasn't a good player -- although I did use the word "nice" -- I just don't think he's worth that kind of money.  Ive seen him play over the years and yes he was good but a player like Freeman impressed me more.  As far as why he was paid what he was, when you get into an auction like this, sometimes logic goes out the window, particularly when your rival might get him.

To me, Zobrist is a utility player but even going with your definition to pay that kind of money to a 35 year old is insanity.  I was not at all disappointed the Mets didn't land him.   I'm quite pleased with Walker. 

Edited by Brad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Brad said:

I didn't say Heyward wasn't a good player -- although I did use the word "nice" -- I just don't think he's worth that kind of money.  Ive seen him play over the years and yes he was good but a player like Freeman impressed me more.  As far as why he was paid what he was, when you get into an auction like this, sometimes logic goes out the window, particularly when your rival might get him.

To me, Zobrist is a utility player but even going with your definition to pay that kind of money to a 35 year old is insanity.  I was not at all disappointed the Mets didn't land him.   I'm quite pleased with Walker. 

While I do agree that the contract Zobrist got was on the silly side, he is most definitely NOT a utility player. He is a player that can start everywhere but catcher (and I don't think I'd trot him out to center at this point in his career), and the Cubs will likely move him around a lot to give players days off. But he is indeed a starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scott Dolan said:

Tim, looks like Cueto is your man...

Great signing!

He ended up being a roller coaster ride for us, but he's still one of the best in the game. 

I hope he works out for my guys.

Since the Giants let Petit go we needed another man in the rotation. Jake Peavy is just too spotty to be a full-time starter, IMHO.

Edited by Tim McG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about it.

His inconsistency with the Royals was an anomaly when you look at what he's done throughout his career. 

And he still impressed when we slid all the chips in. That's what matters the most. 

Now let's see your boys back in the postseason where they belong! 

Edited by Scott Dolan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think pitching in the A.L. effected  Cueto. You have to keep in mind that Kauffman Stadium is one of the biggest outfields in MLB, and the Royals one of the best defensive units. 

I think he just hit a glitch in his career. Plus, he never really gelled with many of his teammates there. Perez and Hosmer, in particular, found Cueto to be quite a source of frustration. And when you can't get on the same page as your catcher, things won't end well. 

Those factors combined with the mid season move likely conspired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...