The so-called "Driggs collection" is without a doubt a treasure trove of jazz-related photographs, but it is a collection that was amassed in a most shameful way. The truth is that while Frank probably purchased some--perhaps, many--of the photos, he has systematically stolen pictures and photo albums from people and institutions for many years. I have personally experienced that, and while my loss was disturbing, I am most disgusted by the photos he "borrowed" from artists and surviving relatives, but never returned.
I have known Frank for over forty years, and there have been times when I valued that friendship, but that was before I realized what he was doing. I have to say that his unethical (putting it mildly) business practices makes it difficult for me to feel good about the preservation of all these priceless pictures. This is not a man who should be glorified--he is, quite frankly, a disgrace to the jazz research profession.
So here I strongly disagree with my friend, Dan Morgenstern. I think the collection should be sold, for it must be preserved and made available, but the proceeds from such a sale should mainly go to an appropriate charity. It would be quite fitting, for example, if the money were used to start a fund for needy retired musicians and surviving relatives. Sad to say, such people are not difficult to find.