That's the Western canonical / concert music-as-ideal tradition: listening requires a certain kind of attention, is essentially intellectual in nature: listening as a gateway to being awed.
But one of the things about jazz that made it vital was its offering an alternative to and commentary on -- and not even consciously -- to the dualism implied by Western art music (and, really, only a gradual and late-arriving development in the history of same). You can and do listen with your entire body; sensation and perception are not wholly brain activities; not every profound experience needs to be sublime and eternal and rational.
The jazz I still enjoy, and listen to, is still in the spirit of these alternatives. As long as there is "true" improvising going on, I'm down. The great thing about the contemporary music scene, IMO, is that improvisation is so highly valued in it, and across a whole range of genres and practices.
Jazz, then -- only not as Teachout understands it = victim of its own influence.