BruceW Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Yeah Man, That was WICKEEEED. Even with the cup he went down like a ton of bricks.... Ouch And out of three referees, nobody saw it. Damn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noj Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Gee, Haven't you noticed.... The Pistons are the champs..... The Pistons almost always keep anybody under 100 ppg.. ← During the regular season, the Pistons held opponents to 89.5 ppg During the regular season, the Spurs held opponents to 88.4 ppg ← There you have it. The Pistons would have locked the Suns down with that stifling defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Berger Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Gee, Haven't you noticed.... The Pistons are the champs..... The Pistons almost always keep anybody under 100 ppg.. ← During the regular season, the Pistons held opponents to 89.5 ppg During the regular season, the Spurs held opponents to 88.4 ppg ← There you have it. The Pistons would have locked the Suns down with that stifling defense. ← ??? The Spurs have an even more stifling defense than the Pistons (playing much tougher opponents than the Pistons) and still gave up 15-16 ppg more against the Suns than normal. Why would the Pistons be different? Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulstation1 Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 the suns lost cuz they don't have a big man stat had a huge series but duncan did what he wanted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Gee, Haven't you noticed.... The Pistons are the champs..... The Pistons almost always keep anybody under 100 ppg.. ← During the regular season, the Pistons held opponents to 89.5 ppg During the regular season, the Spurs held opponents to 88.4 ppg ← There you have it. The Pistons would have locked the Suns down with that stifling defense. ← ??? The Spurs have an even more stifling defense than the Pistons (playing much tougher opponents than the Pistons) and still gave up 15-16 ppg more against the Suns than normal. Why would the Pistons be different? Guy ← BECAUSE: the Spurs "ran" with the Suns who did not play defense. The Pistons play defense and the Spurs will not be a running team against them. And why are we discussing the Suns, they no longer count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noj Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Gee, Haven't you noticed.... The Pistons are the champs..... The Pistons almost always keep anybody under 100 ppg.. ← During the regular season, the Pistons held opponents to 89.5 ppg During the regular season, the Spurs held opponents to 88.4 ppg ← There you have it. The Pistons would have locked the Suns down with that stifling defense. ← ??? The Spurs have an even more stifling defense than the Pistons (playing much tougher opponents than the Pistons) and still gave up 15-16 ppg more against the Suns than normal. Why would the Pistons be different? Guy ← Even if the Suns scored 104ppg against the Pistons, why wouldn't the Pistons simply outscore them like the Spurs did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Berger Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Kind of unrelated, but who is coming up with this "Phil Jackson might coach the Knicks next year" crap? How much did Isiah Thomas pay Jackson for that meeting? Jackson has a higher likelihood of coaching an NHL team than coaching the Knicks. Guy WRONG!! Phil Jackson's playing career went through New York and they won championships in the duration. He has strong ties to the Knicks. (to answer your question, I don't know who started it) He would be a bigger fool to go BACK to the Lakers after they turned him down on an extension and resign. AND....... there is another factor..... and it is not Jeannie Buss......hope he does not subject himself to all the crud because of his affection for her; there are better coaching situations available to him. If he comes back to LA, wins a title, they will just can him again period. B-) ← Thank god for the search function... Jackson back as Lakers coach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noj Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Bewildering! If Phil had simply been kept in the first place, we'd still have Shaq. Also, Phil has the best winning percentage of any coach in history, I'm shocked he would risk it to rejoin the Lakers. Maybe he knows something we don't! Good news overall! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Berger Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Bewildering! If Phil had simply been kept in the first place, we'd still have Shaq. Also, Phil has the best winning percentage of any coach in history, I'm shocked he would risk it to rejoin the Lakers. Maybe he knows something we don't! Kobe had a personality transplant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noj Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Bewildering! If Phil had simply been kept in the first place, we'd still have Shaq. Also, Phil has the best winning percentage of any coach in history, I'm shocked he would risk it to rejoin the Lakers. Maybe he knows something we don't! Kobe had a personality transplant ← If Kobe knows what's best for Kobe, I hope you're right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjazz Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Jackson - 3 years for around $30 million. Money talks. He doesn't have to win, but he can spend the money. Course, health-wise, maybe he'll be dead before 3 years. Shaq wants the MONEY too. After his last year in Miami at $30 million, let's see how happy he is, if there's no extention with at least $25/year (for 3 years). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 (edited) Okay here is a stretch, I thought Jeannie Buss was not a factor (Phil's girlfriend) but maybe I was way off on that concept. With Jeannie's latest TV appearances she has constantly stated she was looking for a diamond ring for her finger (wedding). Jerry Buss does not have a son. They did not want to extend Phil's last contract. They did not want to give him part of the franchise. But....... If Phil returns to Lakers and marries Jeannie (they are serious), he becomes heir apparent to the Buss fortune. OR at least when/if Jerry passes (he is not in the best of health), Jeannie will make him Chief Executive Officer but since he will be married in California, COMMUNITY PROPERTY, duh!! Bruce Edited June 14, 2005 by BruceW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Jesus, As I write, she is on ESPN making the very statement I was talking about, wishing for that big wedding ring. Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulstation1 Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 dr buss has at least 2 sons, if not 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 dr buss has at least 2 sons, if not 3. ← Thanks for the correction. Why does he not ever refer to them?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjazz Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Okay here is a stretch, I thought Jeannie Buss was not a factor (Phil's girlfriend) but maybe I was way off on that concept. With Jeannie's latest TV appearances she has constantly stated she was looking for a diamond ring for her finger (wedding). Jerry Buss does not have a son. They did not want to extend Phil's last contract. They did not want to give him part of the franchise. But....... If Phil returns to Lakers and marries Jeannie (they are serious), he becomes heir apparent to the Buss fortune. OR at least when/if Jerry passes (he is not in the best of health), Jeannie will make him Chief Executive Officer but since he will be married in California, COMMUNITY PROPERTY, duh!! Bruce ← Community Property? Don't get carried away. It's only for your income/earnings while married, not your assets. Phil's not going to outlive Jeannie. I don't think any other coaching job in the NBA would have paid Phil as much as the Lakers offered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Berger Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Phil has the best winning percentage of any coach in history, I'm shocked he would risk it to rejoin the Lakers. Maybe he knows something we don't! He knows what's under these basketballs: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulstation1 Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 phil doesn't need # 08's drama and bs # 08 needs his ass kicked ss1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Nope, Phil will will be entitled to community property unless they sign a prenup. Unless you are a lawyer in Los Angeles, I will stick with that interpretation that has been defined so many times in Los Angeles courts. Pistons won tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulstation1 Posted June 16, 2005 Report Share Posted June 16, 2005 yes or no is phil jackson a hall of fame coach? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnJ Posted June 16, 2005 Report Share Posted June 16, 2005 yes or no is phil jackson a hall of fame coach? ← Nine titles says it all. Of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 Okay here is a stretch, I thought Jeannie Buss was not a factor (Phil's girlfriend) but maybe I was way off on that concept. With Jeannie's latest TV appearances she has constantly stated she was looking for a diamond ring for her finger (wedding). Jerry Buss does not have a son. They did not want to extend Phil's last contract. They did not want to give him part of the franchise. But....... If Phil returns to Lakers and marries Jeannie (they are serious), he becomes heir apparent to the Buss fortune. OR at least when/if Jerry passes (he is not in the best of health), Jeannie will make him Chief Executive Officer but since he will be married in California, COMMUNITY PROPERTY, duh!! Bruce ← Community Property? Don't get carried away. It's only for your income/earnings while married, not your assets. Phil's not going to outlive Jeannie. I don't think any other coaching job in the NBA would have paid Phil as much as the Lakers offered. ← Is this Tony from Philly?? California law is a b*tch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceW Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 dr buss has at least 2 sons, if not 3. ← Well, who are they and why do we not hear of them in the equation and the circus that is the Los Angeles Lakers??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connoisseur series500 Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 It doesn't take a genius to say it, but whomever takes the next game wins the series... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulstation1 Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 (edited) scottie pimpin' might join the lakers' new coaching staff our coaches will have the most bling on the sidelines Edited June 19, 2005 by Soulstation1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.