T.D. Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 ... But I don't trust any photos in magazines. For sure. And it's nothing new. Air-brushing was rampant for decades prior to the Photoshop era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen archer Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special looks like your average girl from high school . She is big time below AVERAGE...if she was an actress (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's she wouldn't be a blip on the screen....maybe an extra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7/4 Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special looks like your average girl from high school . Well...yeah! She is big time below blah blah...if she was an blah blah (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's she wouldn't be a blah blah blah blah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeCity Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 ... But I don't trust any photos in magazines. For sure. And it's nothing new. Air-brushing was rampant for decades prior to the Photoshop era. I've always wondered about this one. Not the Nancy Wilson part, but when did Cannonball ever look that slender? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papsrus Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special looks like your average girl from high school . She is big time below AVERAGE...if she was an actress (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's she wouldn't be a blip on the screen....maybe an extra. Average girl from high school? I wanna live in your world! OK, back to reading my Home Depot household fix-its manual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Ok, sh'es purty, and I'd "do" her" till the cows came home (& I'd hire somebody to kep them distracted and/or lost), but homegirl does have a chin that is a dealbreaker as far as possibly procreating goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjluke68 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 I don't think she was completely naked for the shoot! I swear I see some skin colour, photoshopped where a bikini would be in the pic where she's laying down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papsrus Posted December 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 OK, you fellas are starting to obsess over this photoshop thing. And now we got a chin that disqualifies her from procreation, and a bikini air brushed out of the way? What next, phony dimples painted on? ... you're killing me. Killing me, I tell ya! I'm moving on. Y'all can have her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Just for the record, when I said "do her", I meant "do her". Not DO her. Ironic winkwink re:stunted adolescent sexual maturity fully intended, and apologies if intent was not clearly communicated. I mean, really, I'd not do her. I love my wife and have had a great lifetime doing her, and look forward to a great remaining lifetime of more of the same. And yes, irony intended here as well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gould Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 No one is obligated to "DO" her, ironically or otherwise, but to call her "below average" reminds me of a scene in When Harry Met Sally - Empirically, you are attractive. Anyone who can't figure out that empirically, Ms. Aniston is attractive needs to have their eyesight checked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:.impossible Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Wow, is this thread revealing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7/4 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Just for the record, when I said "do her", I meant "do her". Not DO her. Ironic winkwink re:stunted adolescent sexual maturity fully intended, and apologies if intent was not clearly communicated. I mean, really, I'd not do her. I love my wife and have had a great lifetime doing her, and look forward to a great remaining lifetime of more of the same. And yes, irony intended here as well... A likely story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BERIGAN Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 What's funny is I have always thought she was attractive, but is about as unphotogenic as you can get, which is strange for an actress. Moving pictures, fine, magazine covers??? Just about every one I have ever seen of her look like one's that should have been rejected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.