Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BERIGAN

Expert predicts sex with robots

43 posts in this topic

But I'm 40!!!! :( CARNAL KNOWLEDGE

Programmed for love

Author sees hard-wired sex in the future - and apparently it's all good - especially if you like robots

By FRITZ LANHAM

Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

By David Levy

If you're younger than 35, you'll probably live long enough to put David Levy's prediction to the test. Levy says that by 2050 we'll be creating robots so lifelike, so imbued with human-seeming intelligence and emotions, as to be nearly indistinguishable from real people. And we'll have sex with these robots. Some of us will even marry them. And it will all be good.

Levy lays out his vision of a Brave New Carnal World in Love and Sex With Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships, which, despite its extended riffs on sex toys through the ages, is a snigger-free book. Levy's no Al Goldstein. Rather he's a 62-year-old British chess master turned artificial-intelligence expert persuaded that robot sex can brighten the lives of many, many unhappy people. "Great sex on tap for everyone, 24/7,'' he writes on the final page of the book. What's not to like?

"Chess'' and "sex'' aren't words that normally share the same sentence, but in Levy's case, the one led to the other. A keen chessman since boyhood, by the time he got to St. Andrews University he played at the international level. At the university he got interested in computers and the challenge of programming machines to play chess. Eventually he earned international recognition for his work on chess-playing computers and natural-language software, and in the mid '90s headed a team that won the Loebner Prize, widely regarded as the world championship of conversational software. Today he owns a firm that develops electronic hand-held brain games.

Designing computers that talk like humans naturally led to the larger question of how humans interact with robots, which are nothing more than computers with arms and legs and a head. The Japanese have taken the lead in developing "partner robots,'' machines that, for example, might do household tasks for elderly people. But if you could invent a robot that serves cocktails, could you not invent a robot that would make a superior bedmate?

It sounds like a mighty tall order. A machine with skin that feels like ours? With our physical dexterity? And, most important, with a mind like ours - imperfectly rational, sometimes emotionally intelligent, sometimes emotionally dumb?

"I think it's a reasonable assumption,'' Levy said in a telephone interview from his home in London. He lays out his case in a voice that's calm, rational, almost flat, more geeky than goatish.

"If one looks at the advances in technology in the last, say, 40 or 50 years, they've been immense, and the more we learn about the science and the technology, the quicker it will be to discover even more within that science."

Smart money never bets against technological advances, but it helps if you stack the deck. "The automaton simulates man when man has been defined in an automaton's way," literary critic Hugh Kenner wrote. Is that what Levy does?

"I take a pragmatic point of view," he said, "partly because in my original field, computer chess, that was how the problem was solved." Not by making machines that thought like chess masters but by making machines that beat chess masters. Similarly, Levy thinks, robots need only "simulate" human intelligence and emotions "to the point that they are absolutely convincing." If you can't tell whether the thing is man or machine, what difference does it make? You'll treat it as if it were alive. The rest is philosophical hairsplitting.

So who will avail themselves of 21st-century sexbots?

Sad cases, for one, people so physically unattractive or anti-social or isolated or emotionally crippled that they have trouble finding human romance. People who love their computers more than their fellows. Hey, they're out there already.

"They're lonely; they're miserable," Levy said. "I think society will be a much better place when they have an alternative that satisfies them without doing any harm to other people."

Add in those who have a satisfying sexual relationship but are simply curious and somewhere between 20 percent and 50 percent of the population will experience man-machine mating at least occasionally, Levy predicts.

He respects the fact that plenty of people, out of moral or religious conviction, will contemplate this with horror.

"But by and large," he said, "it will be very good for society, very beneficial, and I think that will be the majority view within a relatively short space of time."

Sexbots may put prostitutes out of business, he notes.

Near the end of the book Levy alludes to a set of vexing questions. If robots become utterly humanlike, must we not treat them as more than machines? So if you marry a robot, can it inherit your estate? If you catch it boffing the mail carrier, can you toss it out with heavy trash? If your robot pops your neighbor in the mouth, who does your neighbor sue?

Levy admits he doesn't know the answers.

"There are lot of questions here that need a great deal of discussion and consideration from people who are much wiser than I am in the field of ethics, philosophy and law. Clearly the law makers and the lawyers are going to have a field day debating these issues."

He expects the impetus for creating sexbots to come from the sex-toy industry rather than, say, MIT. Already a Japanese sex-doll manufacturer has announced plans to market a doll with electronics in it, and Levy has read that Japanese companies are working to produce sex robots for people living in outlying fishing villages.

"I think the Japanese are probably working on this more than one would realize from the little that's been published so far," he said.

Levy has been amazed at the publicity the Love and Sex With Robots has generated since its release last month. He's done a dozen radio interviews and a TV interview. Howard Stern raved about the book. So far, no hate mail.

Would Levy himself have sex with a robot? He doesn't have to ponder the question.

"If there was a robot of the sort I describe in the book, I would certainly want to experience using it for sex, and I wouldn't regard it as anything untoward," he said. "I would do it out of curiosity. Not that I have a need for a new sex partner. I'm happily married."

And the wife would be OK with this?

"Yes, yes, and if she wanted to try one I wouldn't have a problem with that. I would regard it as genuine scientific curiosity."

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/life/main/5414105.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to place a large monetary bet that Levy is badly mistaken in his forecasts for developments in AI and robotics over the next 42 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they don't program them in a way that they can say no. :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost daily, the world P.D. James envisioned in "The Children of Men" gets closer to reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost daily, the world P.D. James envisioned in "The Children of Men" gets closer to reality.

Not to mention Woody Allen's orgasmatron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will have a tough time replacing the economical, inflatable honeys. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't James I was thinking of. . . .

bladerunner-rachael.png

BR_Zhora_Snake.jpg

pris1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sex with robots? Isn't that something many Englishmen experience? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sex with robots? Isn't that something many Englishmen experience? :)

mel torme shared your dim view on these matters. he speaks of his dreadful ten year marriage to an english female.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i told u guys already how i want to conduct the "ORGANISSIMO KINSEY REPORT", right? :: a comprehensive polling of a frank nature, present in a statistacal and honest setting. but u guys would all chicken out and not take it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i told u guys already how i want to conduct the "ORGANISSIMO KINSEY REPORT", right? :: a comprehensive polling of a frank nature, present in a statistacal and honest setting. but u guys would all chicken out and not take it.

first, you'll have to learn how to spell statistical dr. stangelove.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i told u guys already how i want to conduct the "ORGANISSIMO KINSEY REPORT", right? :: a comprehensive polling of a frank nature, present in a statistacal and honest setting. but u guys would all chicken out and not take it.

Hey, I'd take the poll!

But I'd lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope my wife didn't see the news...she might ask for a discount giving back the old husband for a brand new "Brad Pitt Mk II" model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They would need constant reassurance that you're not seeing other domestic appliances.

'Honest, honey, there's nothing going on between me and the toaster...'

Plus, I'd be afraid of catching one of them there computer viruses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'Honest, honey, there's nothing going on between me and the toaster...'

Well, my wife is already jealous of my turntable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh, wonder if the robot'll be based on the cow milking machine? Whoa!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know....these future "experts" also told us back in the 60s that there would be no more cars and we'd all be flying around in rocket propelled spacecrafts of one form or another.

That didn't happen either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...that makes me think. I wonder if there was anything going on between George Jetson and Rosie...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...that makes me think. I wonder if there was anything going on between George Jetson and Rosie...

:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.