couw

another useful post. One that offers support and light.

Why don't you just make it flash rapidly back and forth between them like your avatar, and see how long you can handle THAT. yeah, baby, groovy!

close all tags is hidden under the red-cross icon in the upper right hand corner of the field

there is a drop down menu in the upper right hand corner of the member profile page [Profile Options]. You find all you desire there.

Sound is good, nothing spectacular and the real old stuff from the twenties sounds a bit tinny at times. Packaging is minimal, 20 slim 2CD cases with bare discographical info on dates, tunes and personnel. The box itself is a flimsy cardboard ditty. This set only has the master takes, so it's not as complete as other products out there. I picked this up when I ran into a "second hand" copy in perfect condition for only 20 euros, a price to low pass on! Have yet to listen through it all.

hey, I don't have any problems with this post. Apparantly Hans does and I understand where he is coming from so I pointed out that we've had some problems before with religious content and arrived at some consensus then. All I am saying is that this tends to be a volatile subject and a subject people like to mock or defend arduously.

periwinkle would!

Maybe, but that would make this place awfully dull. hey, YOU were the one complaining about complaints. Get your priorities in order I'd say. If it's real big shots complaining while at the same time offering you a rekkid deal, I'd say silence the bunch and hit for the money and make your family happy. heheheh. they could just PM you but you'd get more response by mailing them yourself, the band that is and whoever represents them. Much of the response would be "naah", but some would be along the lines of "yes, of course glad you asked." you should drink more beer. it's pretty normal for me

your non-fuss is another man's fuss. Simply because it's about God. Easy-po-peasy.

that about covers it, yeah...

privately I have been among those warning you for being all too lenient on the content of the postings. Maybe *all* possibly offensive stuff should be in the politics forum with a warning that does not need a click of the mouse to be read. I don't know either, but these are the same people who have asked you stuff, make links work, add a blue colour scheme and those smileys we're so fond of. Have a go at the Chat in the upper right corner to get an idea of the appreciation of this site out there. People will be wanting to help, just not out in the open. Really, people like this site but are not willing to expose their opinion to the scrutiny of the powers that be here. Sounds silly, is not. Give them a chance by simply asking.

it hurts!!!!

Interesting discussion just now in the Live Chat where "we" sort of reached the conclusion that Organissimo may very well be a bit more aggressive about its approach and actively contact board members located in places where stuff may be happening music wise. I think this board is giving the fans a lot and in return those fans can and should be willing to contact local venues or whatever outlets there are and help the band some. Asking for people to help in the open is one thing and good. But I really think that you guys have a right to personally approach the members of this board and ask them for help in making your name a bigger one. Asking for people to raise their hands will get you far less support than allowing people to help you without being in the open about it. Right Randy?

I think religion sucks, but that "not allowed" stuff sucks, too. this board has seen it's share of missionary postings all over the place. At some point there was a consensus struck that religious posts should be made in the politics forum. You have already mocked and likely offended some with that picture of the cigarettes. Religion is a highly flammable subject and discussion thereof should better be "contained" for the sake of overall friendliness. My grandmother only had one rule at family dinners: no talk about politics, religion or the royal family. We still had plenty to discuss.

Stan getz - Captain Marvel (Verve) some French pressing

I do them with my wife's cotton pads soaked in soapy dishwasher water, rub with the grooves. Then repeat with clean water, rinse, and dry with a soft, often washed cloth.

h-okay, so your PATEch would be my Paycheck without -eck; or page with a T slipped in. ..ptch, pop-a-top again

sorry, but what's the difference between those? I'd say it sounds like Paycheck without -eck.

it's big fun, but how does it all work? Can you set up rooms yourself so you can go into seclusion and discuss stuff seriously and without all the fowl?

I knew it would get to this. Is 7/4 awake yet? Let him sleep. He'll come with enough of his useless posts when he wakes up. Yesterday, he's had another busy day of trying to set posts records! Obviously the only thing he really cares about I see he's reading this now...

I knew it would get to this. Is 7/4 awake yet?

damn man, reading that makes my head hurt. It looks like you need a bit more time to re-read what you wrote before you post anyhow, so the anti-7/4 posting mode should pose no problem for you.

yes and even the nested links at the top remain in position when you try to click them!

yes, it's foreword, not forward and you've misspelled it twice more

none intended. The paper ubu posted is from 1877 as is indicated in the upper right hand corner. The paper published the famous anti-Dühring essay (or rather book) by Friedrich Engels. The title of the paper "Vorwärts" translates to "Forward", a little poke at Dan's insistent misspelling.