Yeah, I've watched some TV and allegedly don't read books. That's the true stuff of genius!
Seriously, it's not just this thread that is dead, it's the whole idea that it really matters how great/ungreat/mediocre/hideous a player Charlie Rouse was, with or without Monk, or more to the point, is thought to be.
Here's the deal - if all you want is The Transforming Genius Of Thelonious Monk, you don't have to deal with Charlie Rouse. Ever.
And if you want to delve with any kind of depth at all into The Full Life And Times of Thelonious Monk, you'll have to deal (and come to terms with) with Charlie Rouse, a lot, just like you do a cousin who does a lot to help the family out in day to day matters but will never be particularly clever in conversation, much less be able to deliver a memorable toast at a state dinner.
You said it - it is what it is. And they're both dead, so it will stay what it is.
Only "interpretations" will change, and as always, what is found will be based largely on what is being looked for.