Blue Note Fetishism is a syndrome with which I'm well familiar, having had a bad case of it from about 1976-1990.
I still love the label, and yes, they did have something different going on. Maybe not always on a grand scale, but you know a BN side when you hear it, no matter what type of jazz it is.
Having said that, I've always, from Day One, had a taste for other labels and other types of jazz, and pursued them with equal or greater vigor. But the Blue Note "thing" is something that is very, very real. It was a beautiful thing, and as the man said, beauty is a rare thing.
Now, having said that, I also gotta say that history is history, and that once you get a good grasp of your history (which, of course, does take some time), it's time to move on.
Truthfully, I think jazz as a whole is fetishized, especially since the number of living people making what is, for me, relevant music of now in the idiom is but a micro-percentage of what it used to be. Great music, my favorite "genre" bar none, perpetual nourishment for the mind, body, and soul, and when it's right, there ain't nothing better, at least not for me, but hey...
Let that which is alive flourish on its own terms, and let the ashes of that which has died spread in the wind, providing bountious natural fertilizer for whomever (and I do mean whomever) & wherever (and I do mean wherever) they might land upon.
Anything else just ain't natural, and if there's one thing the best jazz has always been and always will be, it's natural.