Apologies for a double quote.
I understand this totally. You are expressing the very particular experience you had with a particular recording at a particular point in your musical exploration. We all experience music differently - different recordings, different contexts etc.
The issue I have with the 'versions' bun fights is that the 'for me' is so often left out.
When someone makes a post, I assume that it's their opinion - unless it's a discographical fact or something similar. It would be redundant for each post to include something like "for me" in each post. Can't recall seeing "for me" in many of the opinions in your posts.
I actually try very hard to express my preferences as subjective. I strongly believe that our musical preferences are very personal and derived from a very individual line of development.
Many posts here don't even try. Schnabel is the dog's bollocks rather than I rather like Schnabel's way of doing things.
Think you're beating a dead horse - or a dead pianist. If someone says Schnabel is their favorite playing a certain composer, that's all it means. At least that's how I take it. If I trust that poster's taste, I probably would take the post into consideration. Nothing more, nothing less. I've been led to some good music that way and sometimes to some music that didn't suit my tastes. For me, and I hope for some others here, that's how recommendations work.
I think you have a problem with a certain poster and you carry those problems to an extreme. Perhaps I'm wrong about that.