Ben Webster

[Big Beat Steve]

20 hours ago, Late said:

Let us know what you think! (Was the harpsichord necessary?)

Sooo ...@Late: What are YOUR impressions of the presence of the harpsichord on that album, then? 

[Kevin Bresnahan]

43 minutes ago, Big Beat Steve said:

Sooo ...@Late: What are YOUR impressions of the presence of the harpsichord on that album, then? 

It has to be better than this!

 

[Late]

22 hours ago, Big Beat Steve said:

...I do not find that thing that sounds like an amplified harpsichord here (unusual...) all that disturbing. Not necessary but not all that unpleasant....the jazzier licks (at times almost organ-like) that come from the harpsichord here are OK and do not bother me.

I'd echo this sentiment. Not necessary, but not unpleasant. But I do wonder who (Bob Thiele?) thought: "Waitaminute! I know! Let's use harpsichord instead of piano! Yeah! People will go crazy for that! We're gonna have a new jazz hit!" 😜

I wish there were a Ben Webster Impulse! date with Gary McFarland arrangements. And Bill Evans on piano. I think Ben played better—or perhaps was more inspired—when placed in a setting that was harmonically challenging. I could see McFarland pulling that off while still giving Webster room to be himself.

[EKE BBB]

On 3/22/2026 at 10:30 AM, Big Beat Steve said:

Same for the "Ben Webster Meets Don Byas" of which I obtained a SABA original. After having read what's been written about this session in the Don Byas biography I think you cannot help listening to this record with somewhat "different" (or should I say "nuanced" ) ears. 

In his biography of Ben Webster, Frank Büchman-Møller is very dismissive of that disc, qualifying it as "(...)- with the exception of a couple of musical highlights- a disappointment, as neither soloist played up to par, and the rhythm section consisting of Tete Montoliu, Peter Trunk and Al Heath never merge as hoped". Then, Büchman-Møller states that the album demostrates how differently the two saxophonists had developed from the same background, with Coleman Hawkins as the primary reference.

I cannot concur with the first statement, of course. 

[Big Beat Steve]

4 minutes ago, EKE BBB said:

In his biography of Ben Webster, Frank Büchman-Møller is very dismissive of that disc, qualifying it as "(...)- with the exception of a couple of musical highlights- a disappointment, as neither soloist played up to par, and the rhythm section consisting of Tete Montoliu, Peter Trunk and Al Heath never merge as hoped". Then, Büchman-Møller states that the album demostrates how differently the two saxophonists had developed from the same background, with Coleman Hawkins as the primary reference.

I cannot concur with the first statement, of course. 

So Büchmann-Møller did not dwell on the clash of personalities or animosities that seems to have developed between Webster and Byas during that session (as Con Chapman explained in his Byas biography)? It seems easy to imagine that they were not at their top on that occasion, given these problems. Will try to listen to that disc with a "blank sheet" approach anyway. 

@Late: Thanks for your feedback.