felser Posted November 22, 2023 Report Posted November 22, 2023 1 hour ago, Dan Gould said: Well there are about 9-10 regular compilers over the last 2-3 years and a couple of slots that have floated a bit. I think it should be first 12 to express a desire to contribute (if there are that many) and if we don't have a plethora of long tunes, ought to be of manageable length. Works for me, thanks. Maybe place a running time limit for each contributor, based on how many we have/ Quote
felser Posted November 23, 2023 Report Posted November 23, 2023 2 hours ago, JSngry said: Put me down for one, please. Me too. Quote
mjzee Posted November 23, 2023 Report Posted November 23, 2023 One track? I can do that. I'm in. Quote
medjuck Posted November 23, 2023 Report Posted November 23, 2023 Me too. (Gonna be hard to pick the track). Quote
Dan Gould Posted November 23, 2023 Report Posted November 23, 2023 (edited) One thing that strikes me is that when I and I imagine most people put one together, its with a consideration toward how tough you think the recording ism and having a balance with at least some nods toward easier over harder. Everybody with one track might equal the toughest BFT ever. But this works well for me since the last thing to resolve is "on or off?" and now I have a place to put that excess track. Edited November 23, 2023 by Dan Gould Quote
tkeith Posted November 23, 2023 Author Report Posted November 23, 2023 Mark me down for one, too, please. I like the idea of a time limit for the track. The longer tracks can be saved for one's own BFT. Quote
Dan Gould Posted November 23, 2023 Report Posted November 23, 2023 I think 7-8 minutes as a max is probably fine, the total length will depend on the number of participants and how many stay below 7-8 minutes. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.