2025/26 MLB Hot Stove League

[felser]

On 1/19/2026 at 1:18 PM, ghost of miles said:

Of course the Dodgers have the right, under current rules, to spend like this if they're willing to pay the luxury taxes cited above. And I'm no fan of a salary cap--that's not about reducing fiscal inequality among teams (fiscal inequality as a general value, last time I checked, is something tycoon owners have no problem with at all), it's about controlling player salaries.  And yes, the Dodgers have done other things to create their present prowess in addition to exorbitant spending. But if you want to hate a team that goes out and buys any player it wants, hard to beat L.A. in that category these days. 

I favor a hard salary cap in MLB (both ceiling and floor) based on negotiated % of league revenue, even though my local team (Phillies) is one of the bigger spenders.  With the difference in local income streams, teams like the Pirates, Royals, Indians, Reds, Twins, Brewers, Rays have little to no shot at competing with the big boys, even though some of those teams (Indians and Brewers come to mind) are run extraordinarily well.   I like how it works in the NFL, where GM skill is integral (makes me very thankful for Howie Rosen!).  It doesn't take a genius to go spend $2 billion on the best FA's money can buy.

[JSngry]

Salary caps are evil.

Value is to be rewarded, not stifled.

Lazy ownership and management seems to always be rewarded in some form or fashion. Put a salary cap on them, eh? Then we can talk.